Application of Hybrid Fuzzy topsis for Decision Making in Dam Site Selection

International Journal of Civil Engineering
© 2017 by SSRG - IJCE Journal
Volume 4 Issue 7
Year of Publication : 2017
Authors : Adeyanju O.I, Adedeji A.A.
pdf
How to Cite?

Adeyanju O.I, Adedeji A.A., "Application of Hybrid Fuzzy topsis for Decision Making in Dam Site Selection," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 4,  no. 7, pp. 40-52, 2017. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V4I7P106

Abstract:

Making the best choice of location for dam sitting can now be addressed better with the concept of Technique for Ordering Preference Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) an operational research technique when used with fuzzy logic, an artificial intelligence approach which has really helped in eliminating the vagueness arising from just using TOPSIS alone when several decision makers are involved in the task of making the best choice out of the several alternative choices available. The ArcGis alongside remote sensing tool were used with TOPSIS to select the best site for dam construction. 17 decision makers grouped into 4 teams were involved in the decision making process, 6 criteria were considered and 4 potential dam locations (A, B, C, D) selected from where the best location was chosen. In the end location A was chosen as the best site for the dam construction with closeness to ideal solution of 0.547.

Keywords:

TOPSIS, Fuzzy, Dam, MCDA, Remote Sensing, ArcGis

References:

[1] Allesio, I., Philippe N. Multi-Criteria decision analysis: Methods and Software. John Wiley and sons publishers, West Sussex, United Kingdom. 2013
[2] Aruldoss M ; Lakshmi T.M. ; Venkatesan V.P. A survey on Multi criteria Decision Making Methods and its application. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2013
[3] Ayan M.B. A fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier selection Problem. A journal of management science and supplier chain pp 16-18 2013
[4] Beck, J.; Chan, E.; Irfanoglu, A. ; Papadimitriou, C. Multi-criteria optimal structural design under uncertainty, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, pp, 741–61. 1999
[5] Belton V, Steward T. Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Boston (MA), USA. pp 1-14, 2002
[6] Gregory A.K., Todd S.B., Arun V., Thomas P.S., Linkov I., Application of Multi Criteria decision analysis in Environmental decision making. A Journal of integrated environmental assessment and management. Vol 1, No 2. pp 98-108. 2005
[7] Kilic, H.S., ―An integrated approach for supplier selection in multi item/multi supplier environment‖, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 37 pp 14-15. 2013
[8] Khoshnoudian F., Tabrizi A.M. Responses of Isolated Building with MR Dampers and Fuzzy Logic. International Journal of Civil Engineering. Vol 10 pp 224. 2012
[9] Linkov, I.; Sahay, S.; Kicker, G.; Bridges T.; Seager T.P. Multi-Criteria decision analysis: A framework for managing contaminated sediments. Proceeding of Strategic management of Marine Ecosystem. Kluwer, Amsterdam. 2004
[10] McCartney, M. P.; Sullivan, C.; Acreman, M. C. Ecosystem impacts of large dams. Report to IUCN, UNEP and WCD. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK. pp 81 2007
[11] Minatour Y; Khazaie J; Ataei M; Javadi A An integrated support decision system for dam site selection. A journal of the university of sheriff. pp 319-330. 2014.Key Words: