Ergonomic design of classroom furniture for High School students of Bangladesh

International Journal of Industrial Engineering

© 2016 by SSRG - IJIE Journal

Volume 3 Issue 2

Year of Publication : 2016

Authors : A.S.M. Hoque, M. S. Parvez, W. Akram and H. Uddin

10.14445/23499362/IJIE-V3I3P101

How to Cite?

A.S.M. Hoque, M. S. Parvez, W. Akram and H. Uddin, "Ergonomic design of classroom furniture for High School students of Bangladesh," SSRG International Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 3,  no. 2, pp. 1-7, 2016. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23499362/IJIE-V3I3P101

Abstract:

Ensuring the facilitation students comfortable learning activities depends on couple of underlying factors and appropriate school furniture is one of the key factors. Idiosyncratically, the management of these schools could hardly pay attentions on this and have needful measure in practice due to couple of constrains like financial, technical capacities etc. As, students spend their 80% of school time on sitting position, it is very likely to ensure the supply of appropriate furniture for them, because long time sitting on inappropriate furniture jeopardizes developing back pain, neck pain, postural dysfunction and other musculoskeletal disorder etc. This bad habit acquired at the student stage may impact in the long run in the subsequent life stages. Therefore, this research identifies the notable mismatch between classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric characteristics investigating on 300 Bangladeshi secondary school students (150 boys, 150 girls), aged 11-15 at where fifteen anthropometric measurements and eight dimensions from existing classroom furniture are measured by using standard measuring instrument and determines the mismatch between them. In this research mismatching between body dimensions of the students and existing classroom furniture dimension of attributions with seat depth 97.99%, seat width 78%, seat height 75.52% and desk height 69.33% respectively is being observed closely and the higher level of mismatching is found. Based on the demand to accommodate appropriate classroom furniture for at least 80% students of secondary school of Bangladesh, this paper proposes a methodology and guideline for designing ergonomic oriented classroom furniture having dimensions for seat height (42cm-46cm), seat depth (36cm-38cm), seat width (30cm-35cm) and desk height (22cm- 27cm). This study could be used to design suitable classroom furniture which would not only ensure adjustability but also enhance the level of comfort for the aimed users.

Keywords:

Ergonomic design, anthropometric measurements, Economic, Optimum.

References:

[1] A. Aaras, K.I Fostervold, O Ro, and M. Thoresen,. ―Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. Ergonomics, vol. 40 (11), pp. 1255–1268, 1997
[2] J.D.A. Abeysekara, ―Design requirements and dimensions for a comfortable work seat for SriLankans. Journal of National Science Council of Sri Lanka, vol.13 (1), pp. 77–88,1985
[3] F. Balague, G. Dutoit, M. Waldburger, ―Low back pain in school children. An epidemiological study. Scand J. Rehabil. Med, vol. 20 (4), pp. 175-179, 1988.
[4] T. Bendix, ―Adjustment of the seated workplaced with special reference to heights and inclinations of seat and table. Dan. Med. Bull., vol. 34 (3), pp.125-139.1987
[5] M. Brunswic, ―Ergonomics of seat design. Physiotherapy, vol. 70 (2), pp. 40-43, 1984
[6] H.I. Castellucci, P.M. Arezes and C.A. Viviani, ―Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools. Applied Ergonomics, vol. 41(4), pp. 563- 568,2010.
[7] G. Cranz, ―The Alexander Technique in the world of design: posture and the common chair.” J. Bodywork Movement Ther., vol. 4(2), pp. 90–98, 2000.
[8] C.J. Cook, K. Kothiyal, ―Influence of mouse position on muscular activity in the neck, shoulder and arm in computer users. Appl. Ergon.,vol. 29 (6), pp.439–443,1998.
[9] C.E. Clauser, I.O. Tebbetts, B. Bradtmiller, J.T. McConville, C.C Gordon, Measurer's Handbook: US Army Anthropometric Survey (ANSUR) 1987-1988, Technical Report NATICK/TR-88/043,1988.
[10] D.B. Chaffin, G.B. Andersson, B. Martin, Occupational Biomechanics, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York. New York: Wiley, 2006.
[11] A. Das and D. Chakrabarti, Role of free postural adoption on performance and informal workplace design., Proceedings of National Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, National Institute of Industrial Engineering, April, Mumbai, 2004.
[12] I. Dianat, MA Karim, A Asl Hashemi, S. Bahrampour, ―Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students. Appl. Ergon., vol.44(1), pp.101–108, 2013
[13] J. Dul, B. Weerdmeester, Ergonomics for Beginners A Reference Guide,. Taylor & Francis, London,1988.
[14] W.A. Evans, A.J. Courtney, K.F. Fok, ―The design of school furniture for Hong Kong school children: an anthropometric case study.‖ Appl. Ergon., vol.19, pp.122–134,1988
[15] E. Geldhof, D. De Clercq, I. De Bourdeaudhuij, and G. Cardon, ―Classroom postures of 8-12 year old children. Ergonomics, vol. 50, pp1571-1581, 2007.
[16] A Hedge and R Lueder, Classroom furniture In: Ergonomics for Children: Designing Products and Places for Toddlers to Teens, Taylor & Francis, New York.,2008
[17] M. Helander, Anthropometry in workstation design In: Helander, M. (Ed.), A Guide to the Ergonomics of Manufacturing, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 17–28, 1997.
[18] Hui Zhu, Eva Haviarova, A. Stus, Carl Eckelman, School Furniture in Developing Countries., Dept. of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue Univ., W.Lafayette, Ind., USA. Technical report 1988.
[19] B.Y. Jeong and K.S. Park, ―Sex differences in anthropometry for school furniture design Ergonomics, vol. 33, pp.1511-1521,1990.
[20] H.S.R. Kao, ―On educational Ergonomics. Ergonomics, vol. 19 (6), pp.667–681, 1976.
[21] S. Kumar, ―A computer desk for bifocal lens wearers, with special emphasis on selected telecommunication tasks. Ergonomics, vol.37, pp. 1669–1678,1994.
[22] G. Knight, J. Noyes, ―Children's behaviour and design of school furniture. Ergonomics, vol.42 (5), pp.747-760, 1999.
[23] S.J. Linton, A.L. Hellsing, T. Halme and K. Akerstedt, ― The effects of ergonomically designed school furniture on pupils' attitudes, symptoms and behavior Appl.Ergon., vol.25, pp.299-304, 2004.
[24] S. Murphy , P. Buckle and D. Stubbs , ―A cross-sectional study of self-reported back and neck pain among English schoolchildren and associated physical and psychological risk factors. Appl. Ergon., vol.38, pp797-804, 2007.
[25] M. Mokdad and M. Al-Ansari, ―Anthropometrics for the design of Bahraini school furniture, Int. J. Indus. Ergon., vol. 39 (5), pp728-735, 2009.
[26] A.C.Mandal, The Seated Man: Homo Sedens, Dafnia Publications, Klampenborg, Denmark.1985.
[27] H. Miller 2000. Workplace research. Source: http://www.hermanmiller.com/research/.
[28] S. Milanese and K. Grimmer, ―School furniture and the user population: an anthropometric perspective, Ergonomics, vol. 47, pp.416–426, 2004.