Call For Paper - Upcoming Conferences

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 6 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCE-V13I6P101 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I6P101

Assessing the Role of Managed Aquifer Recharge Systems as a Mitigation Strategy Against Climate Change in Groundwater Resources: A Review Paper


Godiraone Tamocha, Ezekiel Kholoma

Received Revised Accepted Published
04 Mar 2026 03 Apr 2026 02 May 2026 30 Jun 2026

Citation :

Godiraone Tamocha, Ezekiel Kholoma, "Assessing the Role of Managed Aquifer Recharge Systems as a Mitigation Strategy Against Climate Change in Groundwater Resources: A Review Paper," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1-19, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I6P101

Abstract

Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) has emerged as a significant strategy to protect groundwater from climate change impacts like flooding, droughts, water shortages, and saltwater intrusion. This literature review examines MAR's ability to shield aquifers, secure supply levels, and replenish aquifer systems that have been depleted, especially in semi-arid and coastal regions. Nevertheless, MAR's performance is very dependent on local hydrogeological conditions, water quality, and institutional and regulatory structures already in place at each site. There are several obstacles to implementing MAR, including: limited data; the cost of investment and operation; public perception; fragmented legislation; and lack of long-term monitoring of effects. The literature review illustrates that problems with economics, governance, and community involvement can pose as many challenges to MAR success as does technical feasibility. Integrated planning, adaptive management, and comprehensive monitoring are all essential, but MAR can still serve as an integral component of climate adaptability portfolios. Implementation of MAR must be done in a way that is contextual to specific sites, and included as part of broader, adaptable water governance structures to ensure both long-term sustainability and equitable outcomes.

Keywords

Drought, Water scarcity, Water policy, Case-study, Artificial-recharge.

References

  1. Salah Basem Ajjur, and Husam Musa Baalousha, “A Review on Implementing Managed Aquifer Recharge in the Middle East and North Africa Region: Methods, Progress and Challenges,” Water International, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 578-604, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  2. Ala’Alelaimat et al., “Groundwater Management in the Face of Climate Change: Enhancing Groundwater Storage in the Alluvium Aquifer of Wadi Araba, Jordan, through GIS-based Managed Aquifer Recharge and Groundwater MODFLOW,” Water Supply, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 5136-5153, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. Britt Basel, Jaime Hoogesteger, and Petra Hellegers, “Promise and Paradox: A Critical Sociohydrological Perspective on Small-Scale Managed Aquifer Recharge,” Frontiers in Water, vol. 4, pp. 1-14, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. Elise Bekele et al., “Water Recycling via Aquifers for Sustainable Urban Water Quality Management: Current Status, Challenges and Opportunities,” Water, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-25, 2018.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  5. Gabriella Bennison, and Edmundo Claro, Managed Aquifer Recharge in Chile: A Promising Alternative to Enhance Water Security, Managed Groundwater Recharge and Rainwater Harvesting, Springer, Singapore, pp. 151-178, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  6. Helen E. Dahlke et al., Chapter Eight - Managed Aquifer Recharge as a Tool to Enhance Sustainable Groundwater Management in California: Examples From Field and Modeling Studies, Advances in Chemical Pollution, Environmental Management and Protection, Elsevier, pp. 215-275, 2018.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  7. Lorenzo De Carlo et al., “Mapping Saltwater Intrusion via Electromagnetic Induction for Planning a Managed Aquifer Recharge Facility in Maltese Island,” Acque Sotterranee - Italian Journal of Groundwater, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 7-15, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. Osvalda De Giglio et al., “The Aquifer Recharge: An Overview of the Legislative and Planning Aspect,” Annals of Hygiene: Preventive and Community Medicine, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 34-43, 2018.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. P. Dillon et al., “Sixty Years of Global Progress in Managed Aquifer Recharge,” Hydrogeology Journal, vol. 27, pp. 1-30.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Andre R. Erler et al., “Evaluating Climate Change Impacts on Soil Moisture and Groundwater Resources within a Lake-Affected Region,” Water Resources Research, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 8142-8163, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  11. Enrique Fernández Escalante et al., “Sites and Indicators of MAR as a Successful Tool to Mitigate Climate Change Effects in Spain,” Water, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1-18, 2019.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  12. Dennis Gonzalez et al., “The Potential for Water Banking in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin to Increase Drought Resilience,” Water, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1-24, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  13. Dennis Gonzalez et al., “Estimating the Costs of Managed Aquifer Recharge under Uncertainty with Examples for Town Water Supply in Regional Australia,” Sustainable Water Resources Management, vol. 10, pp. 1-19, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. Maayan Grinshpan et al., “From Managed Aquifer Recharge to Soil Aquifer Treatment on Agricultural Soils: Concepts and Challenges,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 255, pp. 1-16, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  15. Nicolas Guyennon et al., “Climate Change Adaptation in a Mediterranean Semi-Arid Catchment: Testing Managed Aquifer Recharge and Increased Surface Reservoir Capacity,” Water, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1-18, 2017.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  16. Sikandar Hayat et al., “MAR Site Suitability Mapping for Arid–semiarid Regions by Remote Data and Combined Approach: A Case Study from Balochistan, Pakistan,” Acque Sotterranee - Italian Journal of Groundwater, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 17-28, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Xiaogang He et al., “Climate-informed Hydrologic Modeling and Policy Typology to Guide Managed Aquifer Recharge,” Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 17, pp. 1-12, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  18. J. D. Henao Casas, E. Fernández Escalante, and F. Ayuga, “Alleviating Drought and Water Scarcity in the Mediterranean Region through Managed Aquifer Recharge,” Hydrogeology Journal, vol. 30, pp. 1685-1699, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  19. Jose David Henao Casas et al., “Managed Aquifer Recharge as a Low-Regret Measure for Climate Change Adaptation: Insights from Los Arenales, Spain,” Water, vol. 14, no. 22, pp. 1-22, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  20. Anne Imig et al., “A Review on Risk Assessment in Managed Aquifer Recharge,” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1513-1529, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  21. Xingxing Kuang et al., “The Changing Nature of Groundwater in the Global Water Cycle,” Science, vol. 383, no. 6686, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  22. Upmanu Lall, Laureline Josset, and Tess Russo, “A Snapshot of the World's Groundwater Challenges,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 45, pp. 171-194, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  23. Elad Levintal et al., “Agricultural Managed Aquifer Recharge (Ag-MAR)—A Method for Sustainable Groundwater Management: A Review,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 291-314, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  24. Robert G. Maliva, Surface Spreading System—Infiltration Basins, Anthropogenic Aquifer Recharge: WSP Methods in Water Resources Evaluation Series No. 5, Springer Cham, pp. 469-515, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  25. Robert G. Maliva, Anthropogenic Aquifer Recharge and Water Quality, Anthropogenic Aquifer Recharge, Springer Cham, pp. 133-164, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  26. Shamima Moazzem et al., “A Critical Review of Nature-Based Systems (NbS) to Treat Stormwater in Response to Climate Change and Urbanization,” Current Pollution Reports, vol. 10, pp. 286-311, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  27. Karen Moesker, Udo Pesch, and Neelke Doorn, “Public Acceptance in Direct Potable Water Reuse: A Call for Incorporating Responsible Research and Innovation,” Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-23, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  28. A. Reznik et al., “Institutions and the Economic Efficiency of Managed Aquifer Recharge as a Mitigation Strategy against Drought Impacts on Irrigated Agriculture in California,” Water Resources Research, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1-28, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  29. Michael Roberts, Anita Milman, and William Blomquist, The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA): California’s Prescription for Common Challenges of Groundwater Governance, Water Resilience, Springer, Cham, pp. 41-63, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  30. Andrew Ross, and Sunail Hasnain, “Factors Affecting the Cost of Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) Schemes,” Sustainable Water Resources Management, vol. 4, pp. 179-190, 2018.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  31. Dilip Kumar Roy et al., “A Review on the Applications of Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Groundwater Salinity Modeling: Present Status, Challenges, and Future Directions,” Discover Water, vol. 5, pp. 1-34, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  32. Alejandro Sánchez-Gómez et al., Modelling Water Management using SWAT+ : Application of Reservoirs Release Tables and the New Water Allocation Module in a Highly Managed River Basin,” Water Resources Management, vol. 39, 2357-2399, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  33. Bridget R Scanlon et al., “Enhancing Drought Resilience with Conjunctive use and Managed Aquifer Recharge in California and Arizona,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1-15, 2016.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  34. Christina A. Schwanen et al., “Distribution, Remobilization and Accumulation of Organic Contaminants by Flood Events in a Meso-Scaled Catchment System,” Environmental Sciences Europe, vol. 35, pp. 1-16, 2023.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  35. Constantin Seidl, Sarah Ann Wheeler, and Declan Page, “Understanding the Global Success Criteria for Managed Aquifer Recharge Schemes,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 628, pp. 1-18, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  36. Abdul Gaffar Sheik et al., “Machine Learning-based Monitoring and Design of Managed Aquifer Rechargers for Sustainable Groundwater Management: Scope and Challenges,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 32, pp. 31572-31605, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  37. Mohsen Sherif et al., “A Review of Managed Aquifer Recharge Potential in the Middle East and North Africa Region with Examples from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates,” Water, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1-34, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  38. Muhammad Sufyan et al., “Managed Aquifer Recharge for Sustainable Groundwater Management: New Developments, Challenges, and Future Prospects,” Water, vol. 16, no. 22, pp. 1-28, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  39. Paolo Tarolli et al., “Saltwater Intrusion and Climate Change Impact on Coastal Agriculture,” PLOS Water, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1-15, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  40. Ricarda von Krüchten et al., “Deep Learning for Accurate Tumour Volume Measurement and Prediction of Therapy Response in Paediatric Osteosarcoma,” European Radiology, vol. 36, pp. 2458-2468, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  41. D.E. Wendt et al., “Managed Aquifer Recharge as a Drought Mitigation Strategy in Heavily-stressed Aquifers,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]