Call For Paper - Upcoming Conferences

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 6 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCE-V13I6P103 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I6P103

Damage Risk Assessment of Lightweight Steel Roof Trusses using a Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System


Atep Maskur, Sri Kusumadewi, Setya Winarno, Elisa Kusrini

Received Revised Accepted Published
06 Mar 2026 05 Apr 2026 04 May 2026 30 Jun 2026

Citation :

Atep Maskur, Sri Kusumadewi, Setya Winarno, Elisa Kusrini, "Damage Risk Assessment of Lightweight Steel Roof Trusses using a Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 36-48, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I6P103

Abstract

Assessing the damage risk of Lightweight Steel Roof Trusses (LSRT) is essential for disaster prevention and structural safety, especially given their vulnerability to structural and degradation factors. This study aims to develop a Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) model for assessing the damage risk of LSRT amidst the uncertainties and nonlinearity intrinsic to the system. The methodology involves establishing fuzzy variables, such as technical structural factors, loading conditions, and degradation states, as well as developing membership functions and linguistic rules. It uses the Min implication, Max aggregation, and Centroid defuzzification for inferring a measurable level of risk. The experimental results show that the FIS model performance demonstrates high efficacy, with a sensitivity and precision of 90.00% each and an overall accuracy of 88.57%. The FIS model has a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 15.13%, a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 8.92, and a Relative RMSE of 16.42%. The MAPE presents "good" predictive performance, and the Relative RMSE is in a "sufficient" range. These results demonstrate that the FIS model serves as a highly effective initial screening tool for identifying truss risk levels, especially for civil engineers. However, it may need to be improved for high-precision mitigation strategies.

Keywords

Damage risk assessment, Lightweight Steel Roof Trusses, Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System, Predictive accuracy metrics, Uncertainty Modeling.

References

  1. R. H. Lasut, and H. W. Ashadi, “The Behavior of Cold-formed Steel in Trusses for Withstand Earthquake,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Industrial Applications 2021 (8th ICETIA 2021): Engineering, Environment, and Health: Exploring the Opportunities for the Future, Surakarta, Indonesia, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  2. Marija Jelčić Rukavina et al., “Development of Lightweight Steel Framed Construction Systems for Nearly-Zero Energy Buildings,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1-19, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. Aghyad Almasri et al., “Evaluating the Efficiency of using Lightweight Steel in Villa Construction in the United Arab Emirates: A Case Study,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 72, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. Try Ramadhan, Beta Paramita, and Ravi Shankar Srinivasan, “Study of Cost and Construction Speed of Cladding Wall for Lightweight Steel Frame (LSF),” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1-14, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  5. Maryam Hasanali et al., “A Critical Review of Cold-formed Steel Seismic Resistant Systems: Recent Developments, Challenges and Future Directions,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 180, pp. 1-89, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  6. Aflah Alamsah Dani et al., “A Comparative Study on the Life Cycle Assessment of New Zealand Residential Buildings,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  7. P.S. Mahardika Hakim, Ranatika Purwayudhaningsari, and Fahrur Rozi, “Comparative Analysis of Light Steel Roof Frames and Wooden Roof Frames Based on Structural Strength and Construction Costs (Case Study: Emergency Operations Center Building at Juwata Tarakan Airport),” Proceedings of the International Conference of Advance Transportation, Engineering, and Applied Social Science (ICATEAS, 2025), Surabaya, Indonesia, pp. 204-215, 2025.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. Wahyu Wuryanti, “Capacity of Cold Rolled Steel Roof Frames with Various Geometric Models in Carrying Static Loads,” Settlement Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 90-103, 2018.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. Neda Mozafari et al., “Assessment of Progressive Collapse Mechanisms in Cold-formed Steel-framed Structures Facing Multi-Element Initial Damage Conditions,” Structures, vol. 78, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Yifan Cao et al., “Progressive Collapse of Steel Structures Exposed to Fire: A Critical Review,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 207, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  11. Mohamed Elsawi Mahmoud et al., “Performance of CFS Trusses Self-drilling Screws Connections under Extreme Loads,” Structures, vol. 74, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  12. Hananto Kurnio et al., “Resilience Learning and Indigenous Knowledge of Earthquake Risk in Indonesia,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 62, pp. 1-11, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  13. Sina Moradi, and Piia Sormunen, “Revisiting the Concept of Waste and its Causes in Construction from Analytical and Conceptual Perspectives,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 621-633, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. Jingjie Yang et al., “Research on the Flexural Buckling Behavior of the Cold-Formed Steel Back-to-Back Built-up Columns with Σ-Section,” Engineering Structures, vol. 302, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  15. Na Yang, and Fan Bai, “Damage Analysis and Evaluation of Light Steel Structures Exposed to Wind Hazards,” Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1-10, 2017.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  16. Hasan Husnu Korkmaz et al., “Excessive Snow Induced Steel Roof Failures in Turkey,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 141, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Francesca Poli et al., “Bridge Structural Safety Assessment: A Novel Solution to Uncertainty in the Inspection Practice,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 421-435, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  18. Numa J. Bertola, and Eugen Brühwiler, “Risk-Based Methodology to Assess Bridge Condition Based on Visual Inspection,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 575-588, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  19. Roxane Foulser-Piggott, Gary Bowman, and Martin Hughes, “A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty in Seismic Risk Assessment,” Risk Analysis, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 169-182, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  20. Zhaoyang Fu, Li Tian, and Juncai Liu, “Seismic Response and Collapse Analysis of a Transmission Tower-Line System Considering Uncertainty Factors,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 189, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  21. Öncü Hazır, and Gündüz Ulusoy, “A Classification and Review of Approaches and Methods for Modeling Uncertainty in Projects,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 223, pp. 1-50, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  22. Sheng-En Fang, Jin-Ling Zheng, and Si-Rong Wang, “Hybrid Reliability Analysis of Structures Using Fuzzy Bayesian Interval Estimation,” Engineering Structures, vol. 307, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  23. R.R. Roman, L.F.F. Miguel, and F. Alminhana, “Model Uncertainty Applied to the Failure Analysis of Transmission Towers,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 158, pp. 1-44, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  24. Xin Ren et al., “Human and Organizational Factors Influencing Structural Safety: A Review,” Structural Safety, vol. 107, pp. 1-15, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  25. Samaneh Salari, and Ali Karimi, “Introducing an Integrated Approach for Fire Safety Assessment in Healthcare Facilities by Interval Valued Neutrosophic-AHP and Fuzzy Inference System,” Heliyon, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1-122, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  26. Amin Hasaniyan Pourfereidani et al., “An Analysis of Success in Supply Chain Management for Construction Projects: Fuzzy Inference System Application,” Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 167-165, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  27. Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough, “Fuzzy Logic-Based Fragility Curve Development for Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Considering Uncertainties in Seismic Response,” Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, vol. 18, no. 5, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  28. Bruna Kaiser et al., “Multi-level Fuzzy Decision Support Framework for Asset Maintenance Criticality: Corrosion Risk Assessment in Piping Systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 299, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  29. Chandrakanta Behera et al., “Vulnerability Index-Based Risk Assessment of Blast Fragmentation: Comparative Analysis of RES and ANFIS Methodologies,” Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, vol. 43, pp. 95-117, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  30. Mustafa Husrevoglu, and Ismail Bulent Gundogdu, “Evaluating the Performance of ANN and ANFIS Models for Spatial Precipitation Prediction in Complex Terrain: A Case Study in Central Anatolia,” Theoretical and Applied Climatology, vol. 156, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  31. Mohsen Lotfi, Mohsen Gerami, and Moses Karakouzian et al., “Sustainable Structural System Selection Using Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Model Based on Seismic Performance,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1-31, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  32. Mohammad Fazle Azeem, Fuzzy Inference System-Theory and Applications, InTechOpen, pp. 1-518, 2012.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  33. James Crotty, and Elizabeth Daniel, “Cyber Threat: Its Origins and Consequences and the Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Cyber Risk Assessment,” Applied Computing and Informatics, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 198-209, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  34. Certification Scheme Light Steel Frame Profile SNI 8399:2017,” SNI, Indonesian SNI Standard Indonesia, pp. 1-17, 2019.
    [
    Publisher Link]
  35. M. Z. Naser, and Amir H. Alavi, “Error Metrics and Performance Fitness Indicators for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Engineering and Sciences,” Architecture, Structures, and Construction, vol. 3, pp. 499-517, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  36. Taofeek D. Akinosho et al., “Deep Learning in the Construction Industry: A Review of Present Status and Future Innovations,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 1-14, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  37. Danhui Dan et al., “The Application of a Fuzzy Inference System and Analytical Hierarchy Process-Based Online Evaluation Framework to the Donghai Bridge Health Monitoring System,” Smart Structures and Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 129-144, 2014.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  38. Abdul Aziz Send, Md Masum Suzon, and Rakib Hasan, “A Fuzzy Logic-Based Risk Evaluation and Precaution Level Estimation of Explosive, Flammable, and Toxic Chemicals for Preventing Damages,” Heliyon, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  39. Kosanam Ashwini et al., “Damage Detection in Structural Elements: Using Adaptive Mamdani Model,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 391, pp. 1-7, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]