An Improving For Ranking Ontologies Based on the Structure and Semantics

International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering
© 2015 by SSRG - IJCSE Journal
Volume 2 Issue 2
Year of Publication : 2015
Authors : S.Anusuya, K.Muthukumaran

pdf
Citation:
MLA Style:

S.Anusuya, K.Muthukumaran, "An Improving For Ranking Ontologies Based on the Structure and Semantics" SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering 2.2 (2015): 29-33 .

APA Style:

S.Anusuya, K.Muthukumaran,(2015). An Improving For Ranking Ontologies Based on the Structure and Semantics. SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering 2.2, 29-33 .

Abstract:

Ontology specifies the concepts of a domain and their semantic relationships. It is widely used for solving the information heterogeneity problems on the web because of their capability to provide explicit meaning to the information. Different ontologies are created by developer for a same domain. To solve the heterogeneity problem among the specific domain several matching strategies are designed such as linguistic matcher, semantic similarity, structural comparison. Similarities among ontologies are obtained based on the term, concept relationship and terminological relationship as synonyms, hyponyms and homonyms. SWRL (Semantic Web Rule Language) rule is developed for common repository knowledge base to detect the homonyms. A merging framework combines the matching strategies for indentifying the similarities and dissimilarities of source ontologies then the similar concept are automatically merged and dissimilarities are directly merged in to the global ontology that resolve the synonyms and homonyms conflict among the domain specific ontologies.

References:

[1]B.Orgun, M.Dras, A.Nayak G.James,”Approaches for a semantic interoperability between domain ontologies”, International Conference, Vol.35.pp, (2011). 
[2]Cho,Kim,Kim.P,”A New Method for Ontology Merging based on Concept using Word net”, in advanced communication technology, Vol 3,(2006). 
[3]. C.R. Rene Robin, G.V. Uma, “A novel algorithm for a fully automated ontology merging using hybrid strategy”, Journal of scientific research, vol.47 no.1, (2010). 
[4]Kamel Hussein Shafa’amri, Jalal Omer Atoum, “A framework for improving the performance of ontology matching techniques in semantic web”, International journal of advanced computer science and application vol.3.no.1 (2012). 
[5] Michel Klein, “Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problem And solution”, International conference,(2009). 
[6] Mohammed Maree,Mohammed Belkhatir,”A Coupled Statistical and Semantic Framework for Merging Heterogeneous Domain Specific Ontologies”,International Conference on tool with Artifical Intelligence, Vol 3 (2010). 
[7]Muhammad Fahad, Muhammad Adbul Qadir,”A Framework for Ontology Evaluation”, pp, (2010). 
[8]Natalya F.Noy, Dedorah L.McGuinness,”Ontology development: A guide to creating first ontology”, International Conference, (2009). 
[9]Nora Maiz, Muhammad Fahad ,Omar Boussaid, Fadlia Bentayeb, “Automatic Ontology Merging by Hierarchical Clustering and Inference Mechanisms” , proceeding of I- KNOW (2010),pp.81-93. 
[10]Prasenjit Mitra, Gio Wiederhold, “Resolving Heterogeneity in Ontologies”, IEEE TKDE, Vol.99 (2010). 
[11]Saeed Hassanpour, Martin J.o’Connor and Amar K.Das,”Visualizing Logical Dependencies in SWRL rule Bases”, International Conference, Vol.35.pp, (2012). 
[12]Siham Amrouch, Sihem Mostefai,”Syntatico- Semantic algorithm for an automatic ontology merging”, International Conference information technology and e-service, vol.5.pp, (2012). 
[13]T.Gruber,”A translation approach to portable ontology specifications”, Knowledge acquisition, Vol.5.pp.199-220. (1993). 

Key Words:

Ontology, Linguistic, Semantic similarities, Homonyms Conflict, SWRL, Merging