Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 3 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJAP-V13I3P101 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23500301/IJAP-V13I3P101Box-Counting Fractal Dimension of the Lorenz Attractor Across the Route to Chaos: A Bootstrapped, Multi-Estimator Analysis
Neer Dubey
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02 Aug 2026 | 04 Sep 2026 | 20 Sep 2026 | 05 Oct 2026 |
Citation :
Neer Dubey, "Box-Counting Fractal Dimension of the Lorenz Attractor Across the Route to Chaos: A Bootstrapped, Multi-Estimator Analysis," International Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1-5, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23500301/IJAP-V13I3P101
Abstract
When describing chaotic attractors, the fractal dimension is a quantitative measure of their geometric complexity, in addition to qualitative visualisation. The box-counting dimension of the Lorenz attractor is estimated for the range of the bifurcation parameter, ρ ∈ [0, 30], with the following pipeline: occupied-box counting on a fixed absolute grid ladder, 128-replicate grid-origin bootstrap for confidence interval, and a two-segment piecewise-linear fit for automatic selection of the scaling band. In the steady regime (ρ ≲ 22), the box counting dimension is nearly zero, and it increases rapidly to about 1.8 near the onset of chaos (ρ ≈ 23), and thus the box counting dimension serves as a numerical measure of the onset of chaos. At the classical parameter set (σ = 10, ρ = 28, β = 8/3), the box-counting dimension is 1.86 (95% confidence interval 1.84–1.87) and increases monotonically towards the theoretical value with sample size. The estimate is compared with the Grassberger–Procaccia correlation dimension (2.03) and the Kaplan–Yorke dimension based on the Lyapunov spectrum (2.06). It is found that the capacity dimension is systematically underestimated by box-counting when computed on finite trajectories and that the dimension of a strange attractor is sensitively dependent on the estimator used: a walking-divider dimension gives a dimension around unity, consistent with a trajectory itself being regarded as a curve, not the attractor set.
Keywords
Box-counting dimension, Chaos, Fractal dimension, Kaplan–Yorke dimension, Lorenz attractor.
References
- Edward N. Lorenz, “Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 130-141, 1963.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Benoit Mandelbrot, “How Long is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-similarity and Fractional Dimension,” Science, vol. 156, no. 3775, pp. 636-638, 1967.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Benoit B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, New York, 1983.
[Google Scholar] - Peter Grassberger, and Itamar Procaccia, “Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 9, no. 1-2, pp. 189-208, 1983.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Peter Grassberger, and Itamar Procaccia, “Characterization of Strange Attractors,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, 1983.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - James L. Kaplan, and James A. Yorke, “Chaotic Behavior of Multidimensional Difference Equations,” Functional Differential Equations and Approximation of Fixed Points, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, vol. 730, pp. 204-227, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Colin Sparrow, The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors, 1st ed., Springer New York, 1982.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Kenneth Falconer, Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - James Theiler, “Estimating Fractal Dimension,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1055-1073, 1990.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Giancarlo Benettin et al., “Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents for Smooth Dynamical Systems and for Hamiltonian Systems; A Method for Computing all of them,” Meccanica, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 9-20, 1980.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Alan Wolf et al., “Determining Lyapunov Exponents from a Time Series,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 285-317, 1985.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Pauli Virtanen et al., “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,” Nature Methods, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 261-272, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Charles R. Harris et al., “Array Programming with NumPy,” Nature, vol. 585, no. 7825, pp. 357-362, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Charles F. Jekel, and Gerhard Venter, “pwlf: A Python Library for Fitting 1D Continuous Piecewise Linear Functions,” pp. 1-15, 2019.
[Google Scholar] - J. Doyne Farmer, Edward Ott, and James A. Yorke, “The Dimension of Chaotic Attractors,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 7, no. 1-3, pp. 153-180, 1983.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - David A. Russell, James D. Hanson, and Edward Ott, “Dimension of Strange Attractors,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 45, no. 14, 1980.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Edward Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Neer Dubey, “Estimating Fractal Dimension of Indian Coastlines using Box-counting and Divider Methods,” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1377-1383, 2026.
[Publisher Link] - Julien Clinton Sprott, Chaos and Time-Series Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - OLIVIER Michel, “Holger Kantz, and Thomas Schreiber, Nonlinear Time Series Analysis,” Journal of Biological Physics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 79-80, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]