Call For Paper - Upcoming Conferences

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 2 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJGGS-V13I2P104 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23939206/IJGGS-V13I2P104

Supply Chain Resilience: A Sustainable Models for Green Energy


Abdullah Bin Fazal, Vikas Kumar, Mohd Anas, Nepal Singh, Ajhar Hussain

Received Revised Accepted Published
03 Jun 2026 08 Jul 2026 25 Jul 2026 13 Aug 2026

Citation :

Abdullah Bin Fazal, Vikas Kumar, Mohd Anas, Nepal Singh, Ajhar Hussain, "Supply Chain Resilience: A Sustainable Models for Green Energy," International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 39-47, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939206/IJGGS-V13I2P104

Abstract

The shift to renewable energy in the world has added more complexities and vulnerabilities to the supply chains of green energy, calling for resilient and sustainable supply chain practices to guarantee energy security and carbon neutrality in the world. Therefore, this study suggests a theoretical model based on fuzzy multi-objective optimization that brings together SCR and SSCM in order to enhance the performance and adaptability of renewable energy supply chains. The developed theoretical model takes into account several aspects of resilience and sustainability, such as supplier reliability, disruptions in transportation processes, inventory management, supply chain costs, carbon emissions, supply chain resources, and risk of disruptions in the supply chain processes. Fuzzy set theory is used to take care of the uncertainties in the decision-making process related to the supply chain, while multi-objective optimization tries to optimize resilience and sustainability and minimize economic, ecological, and operational costs and risks. Also, the Green Supply Chain Resilience Index (GSCRI) is offered in the current research. Based on the conceptual framework, sustainable practices, which include green procurement, circular economy approach, supplier diversification, use of renewable resources, and environmental sustainable logistics, can be used in order to create greater resilience through resource efficiency and dependency reduction, as well as improved adaptability to disruptions. Moreover, the use of Industry 4.0 approaches, which include Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), Blockchain, Digital Twin technology, and Big Data Analytics, can be used to increase the visibility in supply chains, allow risk prediction and decision making based on data. The model is supported by the key theories related to resilience, sustainability, dynamic capability, and fuzzy optimization. Thus, it provides a useful decision support framework for policy makers, renewable energy manufacturers, and supply chain managers for building more resilient, sustainable, adaptive and environmentally friendly green energy supply chains.

Keywords

Supply Chain Resilience, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Green Energy, Fuzzy Optimization, Renewable Energy, Circular Economy, Industry 4.0, Artificial Intelligence, Green Supply Chain Resilience Index (GSCRI), Sustainability.

References

  1. Payman Ahi, and Cory Searcy, “A Comparative Literature Analysis of Definitions for Green and Sustainable Supply Chain Management,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 52, pp. 329-341, 2013.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  2. Leila Aslani et al., “Design of a Sustainable Supply Chain Network of Biomass Renewable Energy in the Case of Disruption,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. Craig R. Carter, and Dale S. Rogers, “A Framework of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Moving Toward New Theory,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 360-387, 2008.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. Martin Christopher, and Helen Peck, “Building the Resilient Supply Chain,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-14, 2004.
    [
    CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
  5. Rommert Dekker, Jacqueline Bloemhof, and Ioannis Mallidis, “Operations Research for Green Logistics: An Overview of Aspects, Issues, Contributions and Challenges,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 219, no. 3, pp. 671-679, 2012.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  6. John Elkington, “The Triple Bottom Line for 21st Century Business,” The Earthscan Reader in Business and Sustainable Development, vol. 136, pp. 20-43, 2001.
    [
    Google Scholar]
  7. Martin Geissdoerfer et al., “The Circular Economy: A New Sustainability Paradigm?,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143, pp. 757-768, 2017.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. Seyed Ashkan Hosseini Shekarabi, Reza Kiani Mavi, and Flavio Romero Macau, “Supply Chain Resilience: A Critical Review of Risk Mitigation, Robust Optimisation, and Technological Solutions and Future Research Directions,” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 681-735, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. Kirsten Hund et al., “Minerals for Climate Action: The Mineral Intensity of the Clean Energy Transition,” World Bank Group, 2020.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Tae-Yoon Kim, The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, International Energy Agency, pp. 70-71, 2021.
    [
    Google Scholar]
  11. International Energy Agency, “Critical Minerals Market Review 2023,” International Energy Agency, 2023.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  12. International Energy Agency, Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024, International Energy Agency, 2024.
    [
    Publisher Link]
  13. Dmitry Ivanov, “Transformation of Supply Chain Resilience Research through the COVID-19 Pandemic,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 62, no. 23, pp. 8217-8238, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. Dmitry Ivanov, and Alexandre Dolgui, “A Digital Supply Chain Twin for Managing the Disruption Risks and Resilience in the Era of Industry 4.0,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 775-788, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  15. Julian Kirchherr, Denise Reike, and Marko Hekkert, “Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 127, pp. 221-232, 2017.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  16. Muhammad Jameel Labaran, and Tariq Masood, “Industry 4.0 Driven Green Supply Chain Management in Renewable Energy Sector: A Critical Systematic Literature Review,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 19, pp. 1-25, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Serhiy Y. Ponomarov, and Mary C. Holcomb, “Understanding the Concept of Supply Chain Resilience,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 124-143, 2009.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  18. Hamed Rajabzadeh, and Marcus Wiens, “Resilient and Sustainable Energy Supply Chains: Insights on Sourcing and Pricing Strategies in a Non-Collaborative and Collaborative Environment,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 62, no. 24, pp. 9011-9042, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  19. Kirstin Scholten, and Sanne Schilder, “The Role of Collaboration in Supply Chain Resilience,” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 471-484, 2015.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  20. Stefan Seuring, and Martin Müller, “From a Literature Review to a Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Supply Chain Management,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 1699-1710, 2008.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  21. David Teece, Margaret Peteraf, and Sohvi Leih, “Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy,” California Management Review, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 13-35, 2016.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  22. David J. Teece, Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen, “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509-533, 1997.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  23. Li Da Xu, Eric L. Xu, and Ling Li. “Industry 4.0: State of the Art and Future Trends,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2941-2962, 2018.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  24. Hans Jürgen Zimmermann, “Fuzzy Programming and Linear Programming with Several Objective Functions,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45-55, 1978.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  25. Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set Theory—and Its Applications, 4th ed., Springer Dordrecht, 2001.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]