Relationship between the Interpupillary Distance and the Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth of Different Face Forms Among Bangladeshi Adult Population

International Journal of Medical Science
© 2023 by SSRG - IJMS Journal
Volume 10 Issue 1
Year of Publication : 2023
Authors : Rajib kumar Banik, Md. Masudur Rahman, Bithi Majumder, Khandoker Rumon, Utpalendu Biswas, Mozammal Hossain
pdf
How to Cite?

Rajib kumar Banik, Md. Masudur Rahman, Bithi Majumder, Khandoker Rumon, Utpalendu Biswas, Mozammal Hossain, "Relationship between the Interpupillary Distance and the Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth of Different Face Forms Among Bangladeshi Adult Population," SSRG International Journal of Medical Science, vol. 10,  no. 1, pp. 15-19, 2023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939117/IJMS-V10I1P103

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to determine if any relationship exists between the interpupillary distance and the width of anterior maxillary teeth in different face forms of anterior maxillary teeth. Direct interpupillary distance and inter canine distances were measured among 100 subjects with a square face, 100 with a tapering face and 100 with an ovoid face. The measurements were carried out by using an electronic digital vernier caliper which measures to the nearest of 0.01 mm. The statistical analyses were performed using Special Package for Social Sciences (SPSS-V.19) computer program, and the Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were done. For all the relationships, the level of significance will be tested. The p-value less than 0.05 and 0.01 will be accepted as the significance level. The mean ± SD of the width of anterior maxillary teeth in square face form, Tapered face form, and Ovoid face form was 49.48±5 mm, 46.81±4.08 mm, and 49.11±4.97mm, respectively. There were no statistical differences in interpupillary distance and width of anterior maxillary teeth in square face form, Tapered face form, and Ovoid face form were not statistically significant. It can be concluded that there is a positive correlation between the interpupillary distance and width of anterior maxillary teeth in different face forms of the Bangladeshi population.

Keywords:

Face form, Interpupillary distance, Inter canine distance, Relationship, Width of maxilla.

References:

[1] E. D. Roumanas, “The Social Solution—Denture Esthetics, Phonetics, and Function,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 112-115, 2009. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00440.x
[2] Carl O Boucher, “Implant Dentures: Prosthodontic—Unfavorable,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1143-1148, 1960. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(60)90227-4
[3] Alexander. L. Martone, “Clinical Applications of Concepts of Functional Anatomy and Speech Science to Complete Denture Prosthodontics: Part VIII. The final Phases of Denture Construction,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 204-228. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90165-3
[4] Ayman Ellakwa et al., “Quantifying the Selection of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Intraoral and Extraoral Anatomical Landmarks,” The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 414-421, 2011. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024- 1069
[5] Habbu NS. et al., “Interpupillary Distance as a Guide for the Selection of Upper Anterior Teeth,” The Internet Journal of Dental Science, vol. 9, 2009. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.5580/636
[6] John J. Sharry, Complete denture prosthodontics, McGraw-Hill Companies, 1968.
[7] Hussain et al., “The Role of Interpupillary Distance in the Selection of Anterior Teeth,” Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, p165-189, 2012.
[8] W. Hoffman Jr, T. J. Bomberg, and R. A. Hatch. “Interalar Width as a Guide in Denture Tooth Selection,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 219-221, 1986. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90348-3
[9] R. Mericskeā€Stern, “Prosthetic Considerations,” Australian Dental Journal, vol. 53, pp. 49-59, 2008. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00042.x
[10] George A. Zarb et al., Boucher’s Prosthodontic Treatment Foredentulous Patients, Mosby, St. Louis, 1997.
[11] Rai Rathika, “Correlation of Nasal Width to Inter-Canine Distance in Various Arch Forms,” The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 123–127, 2010. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0032-y
[12] S. B. Keng. “Nasal width dimensions and anterior teeth in prosthodontics,” Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 311-314, 1986.
[13] Mohammed AleemAbdullah, “Inner Canthal Distance and Geometric Progression as Predictors of Maxillary Central Incisor Width,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 88, no.1, pp. 16-20, 2002. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.126095
[14] Shibu George, and Vinaya Bhat, ”Inner Canthal Distance and Golden Proportion as Predictors of Maxillary Central Incisor Width in South Indian Population,” Indian Journal of Dental Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 491-495, 2010. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.4103/0970- 9290.74214
[15] M. A. Nasr, N. EL-Sheikh, “Intercanthal Distance for Selection of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Size,” Sudan JMS, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 18-23, 2010.
[16] Vincent H. Stefan, and Randy Rozen, Rapanui, Dental Morphology, Skeletal Biology of the Ancient Rapanui (Easter Islanders), Cambridge University Press, pp. 155-166, 2016. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139151856.009
[17] Bhushan Bangar et al., “Correlation Between Intercanthal, Interpupillary, Interalar, and Intercommissural Distance with the Mesiodistal Width of the Maxillary Anteriors: An in Vivo Study,” International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 7, no. 4. pp. 109-131, 2011. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1187
[18] Pryor, Pamela B, Towards an understanding of the strategic influence of the occupational health and safety professional, Federation University Australia, 2014.
[19] Muhammad Waqar Hussain, khezran Qamar, and Sajid Naeem, “The Role of Interpupillary Distance in the Selection of Anterior Teeth,” Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, 2012.
[20] S. Sharma, A. Nagpal, P. R. Verma. ”Correlation Between Facial Measurements And The Mesiodistal Width Of The Maxillary Anterior Teeth”. Ind J Dent Sci. Vol. 4, No. 3, 2012.
[21] Mobeen A Sheikh, Arthur P Topoulos, and Steven R Deitcher, “Isolated Internal Jugular Vein Thrombosis: Risk Factors and Natural History,” Vascular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 177-179, 2002. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1191/1358863x02vm440oa
[22] K. A. Al Wazzan. “The Relationship Between Intercanthal Dimension and the Widths of Maxillary Anterior Teeth,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 608-612, 2001. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119682
[23] Nagham H Kassab, “The Selection of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Width in Relation to Facial Measurements at Different Types of Face Form,” Al-Rafidain Dental Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15-23, 2004. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.33899/rden.2004.45506
[24] Colleen MacLachlan, and Howard Howland, “Normal Values and Standard Deviations for Pupil Diameter and Interpupillary Distance in Subjects Aged 1 Month To 19 Years”. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 175-182, 2002. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00023.x
[25] Khalid Almas et al., “Temporomandibular Joint Status, Occlusal Attrition, Cervical Erosion and Facial Pain Among Substance Abusers,” Odontostomatol Trop journal, vol. 30, no. 117, pp. 27-33, 2007.