Synthesis and Characterisation of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Using Benzene-1, 4- Dicarboxylic Acid as a Linker for Chromium (VI) Adsorption

International Journal of Applied Chemistry |
© 2025 by SSRG - IJAC Journal |
Volume 12 Issue 2 |
Year of Publication : 2025 |
Authors : Maduelosi Ngozi Jane, Bull Okpara Sergeant, Amadi Chisom Ahunna |
How to Cite?
Maduelosi Ngozi Jane, Bull Okpara Sergeant, Amadi Chisom Ahunna, "Synthesis and Characterisation of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Using Benzene-1, 4- Dicarboxylic Acid as a Linker for Chromium (VI) Adsorption," SSRG International Journal of Applied Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 5-12, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939133/IJAC-V12I2P102
Abstract:
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) applied in adsorption processes have shown appreciable effectiveness for removing dissolved ions. This study studied the adsorption rates of chromium (VI) ions by synthesised MOFs (metal-organic framework) using batch adsorption methods. The Na-MOF, Zn-MOF, and Mg-MOF were synthesised solvothermal from the reaction of sodium, zinc and magnesium nitrate salt with Benzene-1, 4- dicarboxylic acid, respectively, to yield the adsorbents. The synthesised adsorbents, Na-MOF, Zn-MOF, and Mg-MOF, were named RSU-1, RSU-2 & RSU-3, respectively. The results showed that the synthesised adsorbents exhibited good adsorption rates at distinct capacities. The BET values reflecting the surface areas of the synthesised adsorbents, RSU-1, RSU-2 and RSU-3, are 371.958 m2/g, 404.248 m2/g, and 547.372 m2/g, respectively. Adsorption rates were observed to increase as pH, concentration of chromium (VI) ion and contact time increased. The increase in adsorption as the pH tended to alkalinity (pH 2-pH 10) was from 2,240 mg/g to 19,580 mg/g for RSU-1, 1,550 mg/g to 14,110 mg/g for RSU-2, and 8,940 mg/g to 15,900 mg/g for RSU-3 adsorbents. Maximum Adsorption capacity was observed at pH 10, adsorbate concentration of 100 mg/l and contact time of 10,800sec. Increase in contact time from 3600 10,800sec increased adsorption rate from 3,340 mg/g to 7,242 mg/g for RSU-1; 6,155 mg/g to 9,972 mg/g for RSU-2; and 3,750 to 4,880 mg/g for RSU-3. As concentration increased from 10-100 mg/l, there was an increase in adsorption capacities from 923.7 mg/g to 10,121 mg/g for RSU-1, 1,650 mg/g to 10,570 mg/g for RSU-2, and 967.0 mg/g to 11,873 mg/g for RSU-3. The rate of percentage removal of the adsorbates was in the order of RSU-1> RSU-3> RSU-2. The order is attributed to the effect of the ionic size of the adsorbents. Isotherm data fitted suitably with the Freundlich model, thus suggesting good adsorption from the solution. The kinetic model was found to have fitted the pseudo-second-order model, suggesting chemisorption for the synthesised adsorbents. The metal-organic framework can be effectively employed as an adsorbent for an enhanced adsorption capacity of dissolved ions on the premises of its large surface area.
Keywords:
Metal-Organic Frameworks, MOFs, Benzene-1, 4- Dicarboxylic Acid, Adsorption.
References:
[1] Wen-Huan Huang et al., “Solvent Influence on Sizes of Channels in Three New Co (II) Complexes, Exhibiting an Active Replaceable Coordinated Site,” Crystal Growth Desalination, vol. 13 no. 1, pp. 66-73, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Hussein Kehinde Okoro et al., “Fractionation Profile, Mobility Patterns and Correlations of Heavy Metals in Estuary Sediments from Olonkoro River, in Tede Catchment of Western Region, Nigeria,” Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, vol. 8, pp. 53-62, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Zeeshanur Rahman, and Ved Pal Singh, “The Relative Impact of Toxic Heavy Metals (THMs) (Arsenic (AS), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr) (VI), Mercury (Hg), and Lead (Pb) on the Total Environment: An Overview,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 191, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Jessica Briffa, Emmanuel Sinagra, and Renald Blundell, “Heavy Metal Pollution in the Environment and their Toxicological Effects on Humans,” Online Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1-26, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Lin ChunXiang et al., “Thermodynamics, Kinetics, and Regeneration Studies for Adsorption of Cr (VI) from Aqueous Solutions Using Modified Cellulose as Adsorbent,” Bio Resources, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 6998-7017, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Indra Deo Mall et al., “Removal of Congo Red from Aqueous Solution by Baggase Fly Ash and Activated Carbon; Kinetic Study and Equilibrium Isotherm Analyses,” Chemosphere, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 492-501, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Mohd Ridhwan Adam et al., “The Adsorptive Removal of Chromium (VI) in Aqueous Solution by Novel Natural Zeolite Based Hollow Fibre Ceramic Membrane,” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 224, pp. 252-262, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Ali J. Salim, “Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium Ion from Aqueous Solution by Sodium Alginate and Carboxymethyl Cellulose Beads: Kinetics and Isotherm Studies,” Journal of Al-Nahrein University, vol. 18, no. 4 pp. 40-48, 2018.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Irving Langmuir, “The Adsorption of Gases on Plane Surface of Glass, Mica and Platinum,” Journal of American Society, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1361-1403, 1918.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Herbert Freundlich, “Uber Die Adsorption in Lasungen,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 1, 1906.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] K.O. Hussein et al., “Adsorptive Removal of Napthalene and Anthracene from Aqueous Solution with Zinc and Copper Terephthalate Metal Organic Framework,” Bulletin of Chemical Society Ethiopia, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 229-241, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Xi Xiang Zhang, Stephen S.Y. Chui, and Ian D. Williams, “Cooperative Magnetic Behaviour in the Coordination Polymers [Cu3 (TMA)2L3], (L = H2O, pyridine),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. no. 87, no. 9, pp. 6007-6009, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Raymond N. Yong, and Yuwaree Phadungchewit, “pH Influence on Selectivity and Retention of Heavy Metals in Some Clay Soils,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 30, no. 5, 1993.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] R.R. Frost, and R.A Griffin, “Effect of pH on Adsorption of Copper, Zinc, and Cadmium from Landfill Leachate by Clay Minerals,” Journals of Environmental Sciences and Health. Part A: Environmental Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4-5, pp. 139-156, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] J.H. Potgieter, S.S. Potgieter-Vermaak, and P.D. Kalibantonga, “Heavy Metals Removal from Solution of Palygorskite Clay,” Mechanical Engineering, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 463-470, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Ali Sdiri et al., “Evaluating the Adsorptive Capacity of Montmorillonitic and Calcareous Clays N the Removal of Several Heavy Metals in Aqueous Systems,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 37-46, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Saeid Hojati, and Ahmad Landi, “Removal of Zinc from Metal Plating Waste Water Using an Iranian Sepiolite: Determination of Optimum Conditions,” Desalination Water Treatment, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2117-2124, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Mohammad Hadi Dehghani et al., “Removal of Chromium (VI) from Aqueous Solution Using Treated Waste Newspaper as a Low-Cost Adsorbent: “Kinetic Modeling and Isotherm Studies,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 215, pp. 671-679, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Phoebe K. Allan et al., “In Situ Single Crystal Diffraction Studies of Structural Transition of Metal-Organic Framework Copper 5 Sulphoisophthalate, Cu-SIP-3,” Journal of American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 10, pp. 3605-3611, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Reena Singh et al., “Heavy Metals and Living Systems an Overview,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 246-253, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] World Health Organization, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, 4th Edition, 2011.
[Google Scholar]