New Product Development for Eco-Friendly Edible Film: Formulation Gelatin - Chitosan from Shrimp Shell Waste with Bacterial Cellulose Powder

International Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science
© 2025 by SSRG - IJAES Journal
Volume 12 Issue 6
Year of Publication : 2025
Authors : Muhammad Yusuf, Rizki Adji Santoso, Yunan Kholifatuddin S, Nurhidajah, Siti Aminah, Muhammad Alfian H, Putri Nadia S, Musarofah, Ali Khamdi
pdf
How to Cite?

Muhammad Yusuf, Rizki Adji Santoso, Yunan Kholifatuddin S, Nurhidajah, Siti Aminah, Muhammad Alfian H, Putri Nadia S, Musarofah, Ali Khamdi, "New Product Development for Eco-Friendly Edible Film: Formulation Gelatin - Chitosan from Shrimp Shell Waste with Bacterial Cellulose Powder," SSRG International Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science, vol. 12,  no. 6, pp. 10-16, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942568/IJAES-V12I6P102

Abstract:

Indonesia produces 180,000 tons of shrimp shell waste annually, which has the potential to be processed into gelatin and chitosan for the manufacture of environmentally friendly edible films as a solution to the problem of plastic waste, namely 100 billion bags per year. However, gelatin and chitosan-based films tend to have low mechanical strength and poor water retention capabilities. To overcome this, reinforcement with bacterial cellulose obtained from nata de coco was carried out, due to its nanofiber structure and lignin-free content. This study used a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) method with one factor, namely the concentration of bacterial cellulose (0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%), with 4 replications each, to test its effect on thickness, fiber content, water solubility, and water content. The results showed that increasing the concentration of bacterial cellulose had a significant impact (based on ANOVA p<0.05 and Duncan's test α=0.05) on all measured parameters. The film thickness increased from 0.04 mm (at 0% concentration) to 0.15 mm (at 10% concentration), the optimal fiber content was in the range of 73.95-74.08% (8-10% concentration), the water solubility decreased from 76.75% to 32.61%, and the water content decreased from 17.06% to 13.69% (in accordance with the SNI standard of a maximum of 16%). The formula with a concentration of 8-10% produced a denser matrix through the formation of hydrogen bonds, thereby increasing the stability of the film as a biodegradable packaging material for dry or semi-wet products. Thus, the addition of bacterial cellulose was effective in improving the physical and functional properties of gelatin-chitosan films, making them a sustainable alternative to replace the use of plastic.

Keywords:

Edible film, Gelatin-chitosan, Bacterial cellulose, Thickness, Fiber content.

References:

[1] S. Agustin et al., “Production and Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose-Alginate Biocomposites as Food Packaging Material,” Food Research, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 204-210, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Mehraj Ahmad et al., “Physico-Mechanical and Antimicrobial Properties of Gelatin Film from the Skin of a Unicorn Leather Jacket Incorporated with Essential Oils,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 189-199, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Haidir Ali, Ace Baehaki, and Shanti Dwita Lestari “Characteristics of Edible Gelatin-Chitosan Film with Added Genjer (Limnocharis Flava) Extract and Application in Pempek” Journal of Fishery Product Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 26-38, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Nurur Rizqi Penta Amalia and Siti Aminah, “Fiber Content, Antioxidant Activity, Physical and Sensory Characteristics of Soybean Milk Yogurt with the Addition of Green Grass Jelly Extract,” Journal of Food and Nutrition, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 50-59, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Official Methods of Analysis, 18th Ed., Aoac International, 2005.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] D.G. Braga et al., “Chitosan-Based Films Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibrils Isolated from Euterpe Oleraceae Mart,” Polymers from Renewable Resources, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 46-59, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Mohammad Deden, Abdul Rahim, and Asrawaty Asrawaty, “Physical and Chemical Properties of Edible Gadung Tuber Starch Film at Various Concentrations,” Journal of Food Processing, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26-33, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Fuyuan Ding, and Lin Fu, “Recent Advances in Gelatin-Cellulose Composite Films for Food Packaging Applications,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 321, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Don Hettiarachchige Udana Eranda et al., “Gelatin-Chitosan Interactions in Edible Films and Coatings Doped with Plant Extracts for Biopreservation of Fresh Tuna Fish Products: A Review,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 280, no. 2, pp. 1-34, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Muh. Agus Ferdian Malang, and Siti Farida, “Characteristics of Edible Film from Modified Porang Flour as Instant Noodle Seasoning Packaging,” Proceedings of the National Seminar on Industrial Technology, Environment, and Infrastructure, vol. 4, no. A2.1- A2.8, pp. 1-8, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Harianingsih Harianingsih, and Suwardiyono Suwardiyono, “Making Edible Film from Nata De Soya (Tofu Residue) as a Form of Waste to Product for tofu SMEs,” Cendekia Exakta Scientific Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42-46, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Juwayriyah, and I. Nugraha, Synthesis and Characterization of Edible Film Composites Made from Chicken Feet Gelatin and Montmorillonite, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 382-392, 2020.
[Publisher Link]
[13] Dyah Hayu Kusumawati, and Widya Dwi Rukmi Putri, “Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Edible Corn Starch Film Incorporated with Black Cucumu Juice,” Journal of Food and Agroindustry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 90-100, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Briggita Rimba Artha Lestari, Nurul Wakhidhatur Rohmah, and Caecilia Pujiastuti, “Study of Edible Film Production from Yam Starch with the Addition of Chitosan and Glycerol,” Chempro, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 38-44, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Stephen Olaribigbe Majekodunmi et al., “Material Properties of Chitosan from Shells of Egeria Radiata: Drug Delivery Considerations,” Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 321-324, 2017.
[Google Scholar]
[16] Tindy Rahmadi Putri et al., “Effect of Different Starches on the Characteristics of Edible Film as Functional Packaging in Fresh Meat or Meat Products: A Review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 87, pp. 192-199, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Zulmeliza Rasyid, Nurvi Susanti, and Nofri Hasrianto, “Analysis of Plastic Bag Waste Management Behavior in Pekanbaru City,” JHMHS: Journal of Hospital Management and Health Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Ratna Ratna, Maiful Hari, and Syafriandi Syafriandi., “Utilization of Kepok Banana Peel Pectin (Musa Paradisiaca L.) for Making Edible Film Packaging with the Addition of Glycerol as a Plasticizer,” Agricultural Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 97-107, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Arham Rusli, M. Metusalach, and Mulyati Muhammad Tahir, “Characterization of Carrageenan Edible Films Plasticized with Glycerol,” Journal of Indonesian Fishery Product Processing, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 219-229, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Safiah Safiah, “Biodegradable Plastic Made from Cassava Starch (Manihot esculenta) with a Mixture of Cellulose,” Unida Scientific Engineering Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 113-118, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Zhe Liu et al., “Characterizations of Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers Reinforced Edible Films Based on Konjac Glucomannan,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 145, pp. 634-645, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Budi Santosa, Gatut Suliana, Mega Christin Yoweni, “Application of Na-CMC from Bacterial Cellulose as an Emulsifier in Instant Liquid Coconut Milk,” Food Technology Scientific Information and Communication Media for Agricultural Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 137 145, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Budi Santoso, Edible Film: Technology and Applications, Noerfikri Palembang, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Tarun Pal Singh, Manish Kumar Chatli, and Jhari Sahoo, “Development of Chitosan Based Edible Films: Process Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 2530-2543, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Ulyarti et al., “Improving Edible Film Quality Using Modified Water Yam Starch (Dioscorea Alata L.),” Journal of Food Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12-19, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Nur Arfa Yanti et al., “The Effect of Sugar and Nitrogen Addition on Nata De Coco Production,” BioWallacea: Journal of Biological Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 541-546, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Reza Yekta et al., “Development and Characterization of a Novel Edible Film Based on Althaea Rosea Flower Gum: Investigating the Reinforcing Effect of Bacterial Nanocrystalline Cellulose,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 158, pp. 327-337, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]