Call For Paper - Upcoming Conferences
Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 7 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCE-V13I7P102 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I7P102

Flood Vulnerability Assessment in Kochi Using GIS-AHP-ANN Integrated Modelling Approach

Ankita Saxena, Yogesh Keskar, PVS Raju, Rishabh Doshi

Received Revised Accepted Published
27 Feb 2026 04 May 2026 19 Jun 2026 29 Jul 2026

Citation :

Ankita Saxena, Yogesh Keskar, PVS Raju, Rishabh Doshi, "Flood Vulnerability Assessment in Kochi Using GIS-AHP-ANN Integrated Modelling Approach," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 15-34, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I7P102

Abstract

The southern part of India, Kochi, is more vulnerable to flooding due to changing weather patterns, low-lying terrain, and fast urban growth. In this research, the likelihood of a flood occurrence using GIS and a hybrid forecasting approach that combines AHP and ANN were evaluated. Elevation, slope, stream density, Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), and rainfall were all included in the weighted overlay approach used to calculate the Flood Vulnerability Index (FVI). To understand the blended risk assessments, an artificial neural network was trained using the Levenberg-Marquardt approach, AHP-derived weights, and the same physical elements. The ANN findings are dependable since the model generated accurate predictions and had a low mean squared error (R = 0.989). The cities, including Kaloor, Fort Kochi, and Palarivattom, are situated in all low-lying regions with a large population and inadequate sanitary facilities, putting the residents at serious danger. Combining the two results in a risk map that is more accurate than either AHP or ANN alone. Future attempts to strengthen communities, lessen the threat of storms, and improve the environmental quality of coastal regions may benefit from this.

Keywords

Climate Adaptation, GIS, Kochi, Remote Sensing, Spatial Modelling, Urban Resilience.

References

  1. Samuel D. Brody et al., “The Rising Costs of Floods: Examining the Impact of Planning and Development Decisions on Property Damage in Florida,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 330-345, 2007.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  2. Yukiko Hirabayashi et al., “Global Flood Risk under Climate Change,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 3, pp. 816-821, 2013.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. Ashraf M. Dewan, and Yasushi Yamaguchi, “Land use and Land Cover Change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: Using Remote Sensing to Promote Sustainable Urbanization,” Applied Geography, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 390-401, 2009.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. B. Merz et al., “Fluvial Flood Risk Management in a Changing World,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 509-527, 2010.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  5. H. T. L. Huong, and A. Pathirana, “Urbanization and Climate Change Impacts on Future Urban Flooding in Can Tho City,” Vietnam,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 379-394, 2013.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  6. Wolfgang Kron, “Flood Risk = Hazard • Values • Vulnerability,” Water International, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 58-68, 2005.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  7. Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz et al., “Flood Risk and Climate Change: Global and Regional Perspectives,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1-28, 2014.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. W. D. Shuster et al., “Impacts of Impervious Surface on Watershed Hydrology: A Review,” Urban Water Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, 263-275, 2005.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. S. Suriya, and B.V. Mudgal, “Impact of Urbanization on Flooding: The Thirusoolam sub Watershed – A Case Study,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 412-413, pp. 210-219, 2012.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Phong Tran et al., “GIS and Local Knowledge in Disaster Management: A Case Study of Flood Risk Mapping in Viet Nam,” Disasters, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 152-169, 2009.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  11. R.S. Ajin et al., “Flood Hazard Assessment of Vamanapuram River Basin, Kerala, India: An Approach using Remote Sensing & GIS Techniques,” Advances in Applied Science Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 263-274, 2013.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  12.  Kuo-lin Hsu, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Soroosh Sorooshian, “Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall-Runoff Process,” Water Resources Research, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2517-2530, 1995.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  13. C. W. Dawson, and R. L. Wilby, “Hydrological Modelling using Artificial Neural Networks,” Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 80-108, 2001.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. Kamran Chapi et al., “A Novel Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approach for Flood Susceptibility Assessment,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 95, pp. 229-245, 2017.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  15. Subhankar Chakraborty, and Sutapa Mukhopadhyay, “Assessing Flood Risk using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographical Information System (GIS): Application in Coochbehar District of West Bengal, India,” Natural Hazards, vol. 99, pp. 247-274, 2019.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  16. Yash Parshottambhai Solanki et al., “Flood Hazard Analysis in Mumbai using Geospatial and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques,” Journal of Water and Climate Change, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2484-2500, 2024.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Logesh Natarajan et al., “Flood Susceptibility Analysis in Chennai Corporation Using Frequency Ratio Model,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 49, pp. 1533-1543, 2021.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  18. Hasanuddin Z. Abidin et al., “Land Subsidence of Jakarta (Indonesia) and its Relation with Urban Development,” Natural Hazards, vol. 59, pp. 1753-1771, 2011.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  19. Nicola Ranger et al., “An Assessment of the Potential Impact of Climate Change on Flood Risk in Mumbai,” Climatic Change, vol. 104, pp. 139-167, 2011.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  20. Sailesh Samanta, Dilip Kumar Pal, and Babita Palsamanta, “Flood Susceptibility Analysis through Remote Sensing, GIS and Frequency Ratio Model,” Applied Water Science, vol. 8, pp. 1-14, 2018.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  21. Omid Rahmati, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, and Hossein Zeinivand, “Flood Susceptibility Mapping using Frequency Ratio and Weights-of-evidence Models in the Golastan Province, Iran,” Geocarto International, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 42-70, 2016.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  22. Thomas L. Saaty, and Luis G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer New York, NY, 2nd ed., pp. 1-346, 2012.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  23. Ali Yalcin, “GIS-based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Bivariate Statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of Results and Confirmations,” CATENA, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2008.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  24. Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, Biswajeet Pradhan, and Candan Gokceoglu, “Application of Fuzzy Logic and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping at Haraz Watershed, Iran,” Natural Hazards, vol. 63, pp. 965-996, 2012.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  25. R. Sinha et al., “Flood Risk Analysis in the Kosi River Basin, North Bihar using Multi-Parametric Approach of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 36, pp. 335-349, 2008.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  26. Mahyat Shafapour Tehrany, Biswajeet Pradhan, and Mustafa Neamah Jebur, “Flood Susceptibility Mapping using a Novel Ensemble Weights-of-Evidence and Support Vector Machine Models in GIS,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 512, pp. 332-343, 2014.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  27. Amir Mosavi, Pinar Ozturk, and Kwok-wing Chau, “Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review,” Water, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1-40, 2018.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  28. Khabat Khosravi et al., “A Comparative Assessment of Decision Trees Algorithms for Flash Flood Susceptibility Modeling at Haraz watershed, Northern Iran,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 627, pp. 744-755, 2018.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  29. Mahyat Shafapour Tehrany, Lalit Kumar, and Farzin Shabani, “A Novel GIS-Based Ensemble Technique for Flood Susceptibility Mapping using Evidential Belief Function and Support Vector Machine: Brisbane, Australia,” PeerJ, vol. 7, pp. 1-32, 2019.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  30. Mahyat Shafapour Tehrany, Simon Jones, and Farzin Shabani, “Identifying the Essential Flood Conditioning Factors for Flood Prone Area Mapping using Machine Learning Techniques,” CATENA, vol. 175, pp. 174-192, 2019.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  31. Dieu Tien Bui et al., “A Novel Hybrid Approach based on a Swarm Intelligence Optimized Extreme Learning Machine for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mapping,” CATENA, vol. 179, pp. 184-196, 2019.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  32. Chinh Luu, Jason Von Meding, and Sittimont Kanjanabootra, “Assessing Flood Hazard using Flood Marks and Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach: A Case Study for the 2013 Flood Event in Quang Nam, Vietnam,” Natural Hazards, vol. 90, pp. 1031-1050, 2018.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  33. John R. Jensen, Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 4th ed., Pearson Education, 2015.
    [    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  34. Komeil Rokni et al., “Water Feature Extraction and Change Detection Using Multitemporal Landsat Imagery,” Remote Sensing, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 4173-4189, 2014.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  35. Freddy Nachtergaele, Harrij van Velthuizen, and Luc Verelst, “Harmonized World Soil Database,” International Soil Modeling Consortium, pp. 1-50, 2012.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  36. “Rainfall Statistics of India,” Report, India Meteorological Department (IMD), 2021.
    [    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  37. D.S. Fernández, and M.A. Lutz, “Urban Flood Hazard Zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis,” Engineering Geology, vol. 111, no. 1-4, pp. 90-98, 2010.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  38. Jacek Malczewski, GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Wiley, pp. 1-408, 1999.
    [    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  39. Nathalie Pettorelli et al., “Using the Satellite-Derived NDVI to Assess Ecological Responses to Environmental Change,” Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 503-510, 2005.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  40. Fernando Nardi, Enrique R. Vivoni, and Salvatore Grimaldi, “Investigating a Floodplain Scaling Relation using a Hydrogeomorphic Delineation Method,” Water Resources Research, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1-15, 2006.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  41. Sentinel-2 User Handbook, European Space Agency, 2015.
    [Publisher Link]
  42. J. Ronald Eastman, “IDRISI Selva Tutorial,” Clark Labs-Clark University, pp. 1-354, 2012.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  43.  Gregory E Tucker et al., “Statistical Analysis of Drainage Density from Digital Terrain Data,” Geomorphology, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 187-202, 2001.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  44. Mordechai Haklay, and Patrick Weber, “OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 12-18, 2008.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  45. O. N. Dhar, and Shobha Nandargi, “Hydrometeorological Aspects of Floods in India,” Natural Hazards, vol. 28, pp. 1-33, 2003.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  46. Tomislav Hengl et al., “SoilGrids250m: Global Gridded Soil Information based on Machine Learning,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1-40, 2017.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  47. K.J. Beven, and M.J. Kirkby, “A Physically based, Variable Contributing area Model of Basin Hydrology,” Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 43-69, 1979.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  48. J.B. Lindsay, “Whitebox GAT: A Case Study in Geomorphometric Analysis,” Computers & Geosciences, vol. 95, pp. 75-84, 2016.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  49. Russell G. Congalton, and Kass Green, Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed., Taylor & Francis, pp. 1-183, 2009.
    [    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  50. Omkarprasad S. Vaidya, and Sushil Kumar, “Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 1-29, 2006.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  51. Matej Vojtek, and Jana Vojteková, “Flood Susceptibility Mapping on a National Scale in Slovakia Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Water, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1-17, 2019.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  52. Susan L. Cutter, Bryan J. Boruff, and W. Lynn Shirley, “Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards,” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 242-261, 2003.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  53. Samuel Rufat et al., “Social Vulnerability to Floods: Review of Case Studies and Implications for Measurement,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 14, pp. 470-486, 2015.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  54. Tom Fawcett, “An Introduction to ROC Analysis,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861-874, 2006.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  55. D. Sarkar, S. Saha, and P. Mondal, “GIS-based Frequency Ratio and Shannon’s Entropy Techniques for Flood Vulnerability Assessment in Patna District, Central Bihar, India,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 19, pp. 8911-8932, 2022.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  56. Andrea Saltelli et al., Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, John Wiley, pp. 1-304, 2008.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  57. M.S. Horritt, and P.D. Bates, “Evaluation of 1D and 2D Numerical Models for Predicting River Flood Inundation,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 268, pp. 1-4, pp. 87-99, 2002.
    [    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]