Citation :

Dakshayini R S, Urmila R. Kawade, Rudresh A N, Amey Raju Khedikar , Sandhya V, Kamaldeep6, Prashant Sunagar, "Flexural Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams Incorporating Cement-Bonded Fly Ash Aggregates as Partial Replacement of Natural Coarse Aggregate: Experimental Investigation, ANN Modelling, and Durability Assessment," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 324-341, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I8P120

Abstract

The rising demand for natural coarse aggregate and its consequences have necessitated investigations into alternative aggregates from industrial sources. The structural performance and durability of reinforced concrete beams with cement-bonded Fly Ash Aggregate (FAA) at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the volume of natural coarse aggregate has been investigated. FAA was prepared by pelletisation of fly ash and cement at a 95:05, 90:10, and 85:15 mass ratio. The beams were of 100 mm × 150 mm cross-section and 1350 mm span, reinforced with 8 mm and 10 mm deformed bars and subjected to four-point bending test. The tests determined the Cracking Load (Pcr), Service Load (Psl), Ultimate Load (Pu), mid-span deflection, crack width, ductility index and energy absorption of FAA RC beams. The durability characteristics of FAA RC beams were also tested for Rapid Chloride Penetration (RCPT), water absorption, sorptivity and carbonation. The experimental results indicated that FAA3 (85:15) at 25% of natural aggregate replacement achieved a higher compressive strength (40.91 MPa) at 28 days than conventional M25 concrete (37.43 MPa). Furthermore, beams made with 25% FAA3 (85:15) sustained an ultimate load equal to that of the control beams for 8 mm tension reinforcement (42.11 kN in both cases) and 4.0% lower for 10 mm reinforcement (50.11 kN against 52.21 kN). At service load, the 8 mm FAA3 beams deflected 9.3% more than the corresponding control beam (4.48 mm against 4.10 mm), whereas the 10 mm FAA3 beams deflected 23.2% less (3.15 mm against 4.10 mm); the maximum crack width at service load was reduced by 9.9% in the 8 mm series and by 39.8% in the 10 mm series. The 25% FAA3 beams with 8 mm reinforcement also showed a 30.8% higher ductility index and 31.5% higher energy absorption than the control. The chloride penetration of all the mixes falls within the ASTM C1202 category for moderate chloride penetration of concrete. A feedforward artificial neural network of 5-6-4-1 topology, trained on the experimental data together with data drawn from the literature, predicted the ultimate load with R2 = 0.9921 and RMSE = 0.72 kN on an independent test set, outperforming a linear regression model (R2 = 0.934). The results indicated that 25% replacement level of natural aggregate with cold-bonded FAA3 (85:15) is a viable and eco-friendly alternative to natural aggregate in RC beams.

Keywords

Fly Ash Aggregate, Pelletisation, Cold-bonded aggregate, Reinforced concrete beam, Flexural behaviour, Crack width, Ductility, Artificial Neural Network, Durability, Chloride penetration.

References

1. P. Kumar Mehta, and Paulo J. M. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 4^th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2014.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
2. Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Report on Fly Ash Generation at Coal/Lignite Based Thermal Power Stations and its Utilization in the Country During 2022-23, Ministry of Power, New Delhi, 2023.
   [Publisher Link]
3. K. Ramamurthy, and K.I. Harikrishnan, “Influence of Binders on Properties of Sintered Fly Ash Aggregate,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 33-88, 2006.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
4. K.I. Harikrishnan, and K. Ramamurthy, “Influence of Pelletization Process on the Properties of Fly Ash Aggregates,” Waste Management, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 846-852, 2006.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
5. Haydar Arslan, and Gokhan Baykal, “Utilization of Fly Ash as Engineering Pellet Aggregates,” Environmental Geology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 761-770, 2006.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
6. R. Manikandan, and K. Ramamurthy, “Influence of Fineness of Fly Ash on the Aggregate Pelletization Process,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 456-464, 2007.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
7. O. Kayali, “Fly Ash Lightweight Aggregates in High Performance Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2393-2399, 2008.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
8. P. Gomathi, and A. Sivakumar, “Accelerated Curing Effects on the Mechanical Performance of Cold Bonded and Sintered Fly Ash Aggregate Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 77, pp. 276-287, 2015.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
9. R. Wasserman, and A. Bentur, “Effect of Lightweight Fly Ash Aggregate Microstructure on the Strength of Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 525-537, 1997.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
10. N. Bouzoubaâ, M.H Zhang, and V.M Malhotra, “Mechanical Properties and Durability of Concrete made with High-Volume Fly Ash Blended Cements using a Coarse Fly Ash,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1393-1402, 2001.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
11. Mahdi Arezoumandi, and Jeffery S. Volz, “Effect of Fly Ash Replacement Level on the Shear Strength of High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete Beams,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 59, pp. 120-130, 2013.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
12. R.N. Swamy, and G.H. Lambert, “The Microstructure of Lytag Aggregate,” International Journal of Cement Composites and Lightweight Concrete, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 273-282, 1981.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
13. S. Arivalagan, “Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Fly Ash Concrete Beams,” International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11-17, 2013.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
14. Iİlker Bekir Topçu, and Mustafa Sarıdemir, “Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete Containing Fly Ash using Artificial Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 305-311, 2008.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
15. Palika Chopra, Rajendra Kumar Sharma, and Maneek Kumar, “Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete Using Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Programming,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2016, pp. 1-10, 2016.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
16.  “IS 456 (2000): Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice,” Bureau of Indian Standards, pp. 1-114, 2000.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
17. “IS 10262:2019 Concrete Mix Proportioning - Guidelines,” Bureau of Indian Standards, pp. 1-44, 2019.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
18. ASTM International, ASTM C1202-19 Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete's Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration, pp. 1-8, 2019.
    [CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
19. ASTM International, ASTM C1585-20 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes, pp. 1-6, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
20. “Test for Gas Permeablity of Concrete,” Materials and Structures, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 174-179, 1999.
    [CrossRef] [Publisher Link]