Citation :

Shrigowri Mangalvedhe, Jotirmay Chari, "Public Art as Soft Infrastructure: Sustaining Intangible Cultural Heritage in Urbanising Mysore," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 142-156, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I10P110

Abstract

Cultural practices thrive in urban environments due to the sensory aspects of daily experiences and ordinary urban life. These conditions, however, will be lost as rapid urbanisation continues. Heritage policy preserving documents and structures has not prevented heritage loss due to emphasising past preservation over practice continuation into the present. This critical gap highlights the urgent necessity of grounded empirical inquiry into how spatial, material, and sensory shifts directly disrupt living cultural practices. This research develops a theory that public art functions as "soft" infrastructure to support cultural practice by providing practitioners control over design and governance. By positioning public art squarely within urban governance and municipal planning, the paper establishes a novel conceptual bridge between cultural policy and municipal infrastructure provision. The argument rests on eight months of ethnographic fieldwork in Mysore involving interviews with artisans and public art stakeholders. Additionally, comparative case studies from India's Madhubani region, Morocco's Fez, Mexico's Oaxaca, and Indonesia's Yogyakarta illustrate heritage infrastructure failures across spatial, environmental, social, institutional, and material dimensions. These empirical observations directly support a clear analytical model that conceptually links physical space, artisan agency, and living heritage. These failures informed a framework focused on multisensory experience, community co-creation, and transforming physical space. Artisan governance directly determines whether public art promotes living practices or becomes an aesthetically pleasing spectacle. The study provides a transferable model for safeguarding ICH in secondary global South cities.

Keywords

Artisan governance, Intangible cultural heritage, Public art, Soft infrastructure, Urbanisation.

References

1. Ananya Roy, and Nezar AlSayyad, Urban Informality Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia, Bloomsbury Academic Lexington Books, pp. 1-338, 2004.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
2. Ash Amin, N. J. Thrift, and Nigel Thrift, Cities: Reimagining the Urban, Polity Press, pp. 1-184, 2002.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
3. Ash Amin, and Nigel Thrift, “Cultural-Economy and Cities,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 143-161, 2007.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
4. Francesco Bandarin, and Ron van Oers, The Historic Urban Landscape: Managing Heritage in an Urban Century, Wiley, 2012.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
5. Laurajane Smith, Uses of Heritage, 1^st ed., Routledge, pp. 1-368, 2006.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
6. Gustavo J. Bobonis, “Appropriate Institutions? Traditional Governance and Public Goods Provision in Oaxaca, Mexico,” AEA Papers and Proceedings, vol. 111, pp. 243-247, 2021.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
7. Fitru Febriarty, “Wayang Kulit in the 21^st Century: Fusing Shadow Puppetry with Digital Media for Economic Resilience,” ACE International Conference, pp. 340-343, 2025.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
8. Virginia Braun, and Victoria Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
9. Monica Montserrat Degen, Sensing Cities Regenerating Public Life in Barcelona and Manchester, 1^st ed., Routledge, pp. 1-240, 2008.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
10. Sunardi Sunardi et al., “Aesthetic Transformation of Javanese Wayang Performances in the Digital Era,” Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 211-226, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
11. Abinash Kumar Jha, Jitendra Mohan Mishra, and R C Anu Chandran, “Indigenous Tourism in India: Evaluating the Strengths of Mithila Painting Art and Heritage and Suggesting Integrated Marketing Development Approach for Sustainable Promoti,” Atna Journal of Tourism Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1-34, 2017.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
12. Tim Hall, and Iain Robertson, “Public Art and Urban Regeneration: Advocacy, Claims and Critical Debates,” Landscape Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 5-26, 2001.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
13. UNESCO, Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Heritage, General Assembly at its Second Ordinary Session, pp. 1-48, 2008.
    [Publisher Link]
14. Discover the Creative Side of Mysuru, Incredible India, Ministry of Tourism, Govt. of India. [Online]. Available: https://incredibleindia.gov.in/en/karnataka/mysuru/discover-the-creative-side-of-mysuru
15. David Throsby, “Cultural Capital,” Journal of Cultural Economics, vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 3-12, 1999.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
16. Brian Larkin, “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure,” Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 42, pp. 327-343, 2013.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
17. Meera Iyer, Stepping up for Heritage: Mysuru's Active Community, Deccan Herald, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.deccanherald.com/specials/stepping-up-for-heritage-mysuru-s-active-community-2894676
18. Martin Zebracki, and Dirk De Bekker, “Public Art for an Inclusive City: Producers and Publics on the Social Potentials and Problems of Flagship Vis-à-Vis Community Art,” City & Society, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 14-44, 2018.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
19. Ananya Pati, and Mujahid Husain, “People’s Perspectives on Heritage Conservation and Tourism Development: A Case Study of Varanasi,” Built Heritage, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2023.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
20. Juhani Pallasmaa, The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses, Wiley, pp. 1-80, 2005.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
21. Saarra Boutahar, and Bouchra Debbagh, “Assessing the Role of Territorial Governance in the Success of Territory Projects: A Case Study of the Fez Craft Industry,” Moroccan Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1-13, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
22. A.M. Simone, “People as Infrastructure: Intersecting Fragments in Johannesburg,” Public Culture, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 407-429, 2004.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
23. Vanessa Watson, “Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues,” Urban Studies, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 2259-2275, 2009.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
24. C.D. Throsby, Economics and Culture, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-208, 2001.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
25. UNESCO, Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, Paris, 2003.
    [Publisher Link]
26. Experts Flag Threat to Heritage from Urbanisation, Climate Change, The Hindu, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/experts-flag-threat-to-heritage-from-urbanisation-climate-change/article70338378.ece
27. Martin Zebracki, Joni M Palmer, “Introduction to Special Issue: Urban Public Art: Geographies of Co-Production,” City & Society, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 5-13, 2018.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
28. Murray Parker, Dirk H. R. Spennemann, and Jennifer Bond, “Recognising Tactual Aspects of the Urban Environment Through Walking—A Critical Discussion of Touch-, Tactile-, and Haptic-Based Sensewalk Methodologies,” Urban Science, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-14, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
29. Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space, Basil Blackwell, pp. 1-454, 1991.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
30. Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-366, 1999.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]