A Comparative Study to Improve Service Ability by Enhancing the Safety Margin of Retaining Walls by Incorporating Metallic Strips or Geotextiles with Soil Mass

International Journal of Civil Engineering
© 2022 by SSRG - IJCE Journal
Volume 9 Issue 5
Year of Publication : 2022
Authors : Md. Abdullah Al Arafat, Md. Abul Kalam Azad, Md. Sazzadul Bari
pdf
How to Cite?

Md. Abdullah Al Arafat, Md. Abul Kalam Azad, Md. Sazzadul Bari, "A Comparative Study to Improve Service Ability by Enhancing the Safety Margin of Retaining Walls by Incorporating Metallic Strips or Geotextiles with Soil Mass," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 9,  no. 5, pp. 5-15, 2022. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V9I5P102

Abstract:

The use of non-biodegradable and reinforcing materials in soil mass enhances safety with a highly cost-effective and dependable method. In this study, we used the limit equilibrium analytical technique to numerically determine the total internal and external stability performance of retaining walls using seven different height models. The reinforcement allows the soil mass to withstand strain in ways that the earth could not alone. Because stresses formed within the mass are transmitted from the soil to the reinforcing strips through friction, the internal friction of the soil is the source of this tension resistance. The parametric and comparative investigations yielded a wealth of information concerning the internal and exterior stability of reinforced earth-retaining walls. In this study, galvanized steel strips and geotextiles are engaged as reinforced elements in the reinforced soil. We demonstrated the energy difference between these two sorts of components. In this paper, we look at serviceability through internal stability to enhance the wall's service life and factor of safety against overturning, sliding and bearing capacity failure. The major goal of this study is to compare the factor of safety against failure (pullout, strip breaking, bearing capacity, overturning, sliding, and so on) between reinforced and unreinforced models generated using numerical analysis to see which is more constructive. After numerical analysis, we found that the value of the factor of safety increased significantly in all types of failures. Not only that, but we also find out which is more reliable between strips and fabrics.

Keywords:

Retaining wall, Factor of safety, Stability, Sliding, Bearing capacity, Serviceability, Galvanized steel strips, Geotextiles.

References:

[1] Shin E. C, Cho S. D, & Lee K. W, “Case Study of Reinforced Earth Wall Failure during Extreme Rainfall,” Proceeding of TC302 Symposium Osaka 2011: International Symposium on Backwards Problem in Geotechnical Engineering and Monitoring of GeoConstruction, pp. 146–153, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://repository.kulib.kyotou.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2433/173835
[2] Xiaopeng Guo, Zhang H, and Liangliang Liu, “Planar Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Foundations: A Review,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 12, 2020. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03930-5
[3] Vijay Kumar, and Dr. Bharat Nagar, “Analysis and Design of Reinforced Earth wall,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research (IJSER), vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 281-287, 2021.
[4] Henri Vidal, The Principle of Reinforced Earth, 1969. [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrr/1969/282/282- 001.pdf
[5] Derrick I. Price, “Reinforced Earth,” Ground Engineering, no. 3, pp. 19-24, 1975.
[6] Okechukwu S.I, Okeke et al., “Reinforced Earth: Principles and Applications in Engineering Construction,” International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 14-33, 2016.
[7] Belabed L, Benyaghla H, and Jarir Yahiaoui, “Internal Stability Analysis of Reinforced Earth Retaining Walls,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 443-452, 2011. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9390-4
[8] BS. Brown, H.G. Poulos, “Analysis of Full Scale Experimental Reinforced Embankments,” Proceedings 4th Australia-New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics, Perth, Western Australia, pp. 183-187, 1984.
[9] Nand Kishore, “Concept and Design of Reinforced Earth Structures,” Report no. GE: R73, 2005.
[10] Braja M.Das, Principle of Foundation Engineering, SI; 8th Edition, 2016.
[11] Damians I. P, Bathurst R. J, Josa A, & Lloret A, “Numerical Analysis of an Instrumented Steel-Reinforced Soil Wall,” International Journal of Geomechanics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 04014037, 2015. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)gm.1943-5622.0000394
[12] Richard J. Bathurst, Axel Nernheim, and Tony M. Allen, “Predicted Loads in Steel-Reinforced Soil Walls using the AASHTO Simplified Method,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 177-184, 2009. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:2(177)
[13] Imad A. Basheer and Yacoub M. Najjar, “Reliability-Based Design of Reinforced Earth Retaining Walls,” Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1526, no. 1, pp. 64-78, 1996. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1526-09
[14] Aqueeb Inamdar, “Global Stability Analysis of Reinforced Earth Wall Using Basal Reinforcement,” International Journal for Science and Advance Research in Technology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 198-202, 2020. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12847838
[15] Adnan A. Basma, Samer A. Barakat, and Maher T. Omar, “Reliability-Based Risk Index for the Design of Reinforced Earth Structures,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 225-242, 2003. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024932408001
[16] Young Je Kim et al., “Behaviour Analysis of Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall According to Laboratory Scale Test,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1-17, 2020. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030901
[17] Michael Dobie, CEng FICE, “Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls - An Outline of Design Methods and Sources of Conservatism,” Conference: CTAG/CCIGS Seminar on Reinforced Soil Design, at Wuhan, China, 2013.
[18] Richard J. Bathurst, “Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Testing Modeling and Design,” Geoindex –Indian Geotechnical Society, IGC, Chennai, India, pp. 21-32, 2006.
[19] Kianoosh Hatami, Richard J. Bathurst, and Pasquale Di Pietro, “Static Response of Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls with Nonuniform Reinforcement,” International Journal of Geomechanics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 477-506, 2001. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1080/15323640108500164
[20] Carlos Vinicius Santos Benjamim, B. S. Bueno and J. G. Zornberg, “Field Monitoring Evaluation of Geotextile-Reinforced Soil-Retaining Walls,” Geosynthetics International, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 100-118, 2007. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.2.100
[21] Erol Guler, Murat Hamderi, and Mehmet Melih Demirkan, “Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall Structures with Cohesive and Granular Backfills,” Geosynthetics International, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 330-345, 2007. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.6.330
[22] Richard J. Bathurst, and D.J. Benjamin, “Failure of a Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Wall,” Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1990.
[23] Ayush Mittal, ShalineeShukla, “Effect of Non-Woven Geotextile and Biaxial Geogrid Reinforcement on the Strength Behaviour of Subgrade Soil,” SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 28-32, 2018. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V5I10P105
[24] R.J. Bathurst, et al., “Performance Testing and Numerical Modeling of Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls,” Conference: Seventh International Geosynthetics Conference, at Nice, France, 2002.
[25] Safa Hussain, Abid Awn, and Waad Abdulsattar Zakaria, “Behavior of Retaining Wall Founded on Collapsible Soil – A Prototype Laboratory Study,” Diyala Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1-42, 2014. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.24237/djes.2014.07301
[26] Moamen E. Abd El Raouf, “The Residual Lateral Earth Pressure on Retaining Wall Due to Vibratory Rollers,” Journal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector, vol. 14, no. 50, pp. 37-46, 2019. Crossref, http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/auej.2019.28504