Call For Paper - Upcoming Conferences

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 6 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCE-V13I6P113 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I6P113

Stabilization of Clay Soils for Andean Roads Using Microsilica: Evaluation of Mechanical Performance


William Herbert Gutarra Serpa, Alejandro Renzo Flores Lorenzo, Katherin Sheyla Flores Aquino, Aron Jhonatan Aliaga Contreras

Received Revised Accepted Published
14 Mar 2026 13 Apr 2026 12 May 2026 30 Jun 2026

Citation :

William Herbert Gutarra Serpa, Alejandro Renzo Flores Lorenzo, Katherin Sheyla Flores Aquino, Aron Jhonatan Aliaga Contreras, "Stabilization of Clay Soils for Andean Roads Using Microsilica: Evaluation of Mechanical Performance," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 187-204, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I6P113

Abstract

Soil types are very important for the foundations of civil engineering projects. They are used a lot in highways, buildings, bridges, and dams, and they make sure that the whole infrastructure stays stable for its whole life. The current study examines the stabilization of clayey soils for the Andean roads (Qhapaq Ñan) situated in the Huancan district, Huancayo province, within the department of Junín, through the incorporation of microsilica in varying dosages. This study investigates the impact of incorporating 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% Microsilica (MS) on the physical and mechanical properties of clay soil, utilizing tests in accordance with ASTM and AASHTO standards, including Atterberg Limits, Modified Proctor, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), and Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS). The results show that the soil's liquid limit tends to go up to a dose of 4% MS, which is because it can hold more moisture; this obeys the retention capacity of humidity. The soil's mechanical property values also improved, especially when 6% MS was added. The results were 22.01% for CBR and 7.03 kg/cm² for unconfined compressive strength, which are good values for road subgrade. It is concluded that the incorporation of microsilica stabilizes clayey soil for Andean roads, increasing the strength and compaction of the subgrade and providing indicators of gradual soil improvement using up to a 6% MS dose; however, this dosage should be limited to no more than 6% MS due to secondary effects such as internal particle dryness and lack of homogeneity in the mix.

Keywords

Clay Soil, Microsilica, Soil Stabilization, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS).

References

  1. Yeşim Sema Ünsever, and Mamadou Lamine Diallo, “Stabilization of Clay Soils Using Fly Ash,” Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 81-87, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  2. Sultan Almuaythir et al., “Sustainable Soil Stabilization using Industrial Waste Ash: Enhancing Expansive Clay Properties,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 1-24, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. Ikenna J. Okeke et al., “The Role of Low-Carbon Fuels and Carbon Capture in Decarbonizing the U.S. Clinker Manufacturing for Cement Production: CO2 Emissions Reduction Potentials,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 1-22, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. Zied Benghazi, Rima Tobal, and Adel Djellali, “Life Cycle Analysis Comparison of Stabilizing Materials for Expansive Soils,” ARCHive-SR, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 31-37, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  5. Sultan Almuaythir, Muhammad Syamsul Imran Zaini, and Muzamir Hasan, “Shear Strength, Compressibility, and Consolidation Behaviour of Expansive Clay Soil Stabilized with Lime and Silica Fume,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, pp. 1-21, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  6. B. R. Phanikumar, M. Jagapathi Raju, and E. Ramanjaneya Raju, “Silica Fume Stabilization of an Expansive Clay Subgrade and the Effect of Silica Fume-Stabilised Soil Cushion on its CBR,” Geomechanics and Geoengineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 64-77, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  7. Ahmed S.A. Al-Gharbawi, Ahmed M. Najemalden, and Mohammed Y. Fattah, “Expansive Soil Stabilization with Lime, Cement, and Silica Fume,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. Hadi Ahmadi, and Omid Shafiee, “Experimental Comparative Study on the Performance of Nano-SiO2 and Microsilica in Stabilization of Clay,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 134, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. Gizem Aksu, and Tugba Eskisar, “The Geomechanical Properties of Soils Treated with Nanosilica Particles,” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 954-969, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Abhay Malik et al., “Strength Characteristics of Clayey Soil Stabilized with Nano-silica,” Recycled Waste Materials, vol. 32, pp. 11-17, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  11. Nitin Tiwari, Neelima Satyam, and Jasmin Patva, “Engineering Characteristics and Performance of Polypropylene Fibre and Silica Fume Treated Expansive Soil Subgrade,” International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, vol. 6, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  12. Singh Harshit, Parihar Satish, and Srivastava Shashi Kant, “Laboratory Investigation of Different Additives to Characterize the Performance of Sub-Grade,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2413, no. 1, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  13. Zia ur Rehman, and Usama Khalid, “Optimization of COVID-19 Face Mask Waste Fibers and Silica Fume as a Balanced Mechanical Ameliorator of Fat Clay Using Response Surface Methodology,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 29, pp. 17001-17016, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. Muhammad Syamsul Imran Zaini, and Muzamir Hasan, “Stabilization of Expansive Soil using Silica Fume and Lime,” Construction, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45-51, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  15. Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS), Andean Agriculture, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.fao.org/giahs/around-the-world/detail/peru-agriculture/es
  16. Romana Mariyam Rasheed et al., “Sustainable Assessment and Carbon Footprint Analysis of Polysaccharide Biopolymer-Amended Soft Soil as an Alternate Material to Canal Lining,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 11, pp. 1-14, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Boris F. Ochoa-Tocachi et al., “Potential Contributions of Pre-Inca Infiltration Infrastructure to Andean Water Security,” Nature Sustainability, vol. 2, pp. 584-593, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  18. Rafat Siddique, and Mohammad Iqbal Khan, “Silica Fume,” Supplementary Cementing Materials, pp. 67-119, 2011.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  19. Muhammad Waleed, and Fahad Alshawmar, “Enhancing Mechanical Properties of Low Plasticity Soil Through Coal and Silica Fume Stabilization,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, pp. 1-19, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  20. Masoud Oulapour, Arash Adib, and Atefeh Safii, “Enhancing Strength and Durability of Fine-Grained Soils with Persian Gum Biopolymer and Glass Fibers under Freeze–Thaw Cycles,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 43, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  21. Tacettin Geçkil, Talha Sarıcı, and Bahadır Karabaş, “Investigation of the Effect of Stabilizing Subgrade Soils with Recycled Glass Powder on Freeze–Thaw Resistance,” Gümüşhane University Journal of Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 179-196, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  22. NTP 339.129 Soils. Test Method for Determining the Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, INACAL, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/527475902/NTP-339-129
  23. NTP 339.141: Soils. Test Method for Laboratory Soil Compaction Using Modified Energy, INACAL, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://studylib.net/doc/27270031/ntp-339.141--2014--proctor-modificado
  24. NTP 339.145 Soils. Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils, INACAL, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://es.scribd.com/document/919192883/NTP-339-145-2014-Ensayo-de-CBR
  25. NTP 339.167 - Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soils, INACAL, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/529038012/NTP-339-167-Resistencia-a-la-compresion-no-confinada-de-los-suelos-cohesivos
  26. NTP 339.127 Soils, Test Method for Determining the Moisture Content of a Soil, INACAL, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/529038268/NTP-339-127-Contenido-de-Humedad
  27. ASTM D2166/D2166M, Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, ASTM International, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://es.scribd.com/document/521086244/ASTM-D-2166-16-Compresion-No-Confinada-Suelos
  28. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, 1993. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/doc/50153305/AASHTO-93-Guide-for-Design-of-Pavement-Structures
  29. Pratyasha Singh, Hemanta Kumar Dash, and Sandeep Samantaray, “Effect of Silica Fume on Engineering Properties of Expansive Soil,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 5035-5040, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  30. Sampad Kumar Pradhan, “Stabilization of Cohesive Soils Under Effect of Natural Pozzolaic Ash and Lime,” International Journal of Engineering, Management, Humanities and Social Sciences Paradigms (IJEMHS), vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 261-264, 2018.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  31. Mahmoud Abo Bakr El Sideek, “Effect of Silica Fume on the Shear Strength of Cohesionless Soil,” International Journal of Civil Engineering And Technology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1-16, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  32. Mohamad Nidzam Rahmat, and Norsalisma Ismail, “Effect of Optimum Compaction Moisture Content Formulations on the Strength and Durability of Sustainable Stabilised Materials,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 157, pp. 257-266, 2018.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  33. Syahril, Dian Adiputra Purba, and Sandy D. Sagala, “Effect of Calcite and Silica Fume on Compaction and CBR in Clay Stabilization,” Geomate Journal, vol. 29, no. 133, pp. 39-46  2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  34. Jose Luis Chavez Torres et al., Soil Stabilization for Foundations: Chemical and Mechanical Methods,” European Public & Social Innovation Review, vol. 9, pp. 1-21, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  35. Muhammad Syamsul Imran Zaini, and Muzamir Hasan, “Effectiveness of Silica Fume Eggshell Ash and Lime Use on the Properties of Kaolinitic Clay,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 337-352, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  36. ASTM D3282 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes, ASTM International, pp. 1-6, 2015.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  37. Hongwei Wang et al., “Global Trends and Perspectives in Soil Stabilization/Solidification Technologies: A Three-Decade Bibliometric Analysis Focused on Heavy Metal Remediation and Sustainable Applications,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, 2026.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  38. Rishabh Bajpai et al., “Environmental Impact Assessment of Fly Ash and Silica Fume Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 254, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  39. Agustin Laveglia et al., “Hydrated Lime Life-Cycle Assessment: Current and Future Scenarios in Four EU Countries,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 369, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  40. Izhar Hussain Shah et al., “Cement Substitution with Secondary Materials can Reduce Annual Global CO2 Emissions by up to 1.3 Gigatons,” Nature communications, vol. 13, pp. 1-11, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  41. Wenwei Li et al., “Synergistic Effects of Cement–Silica Fume Composite on Expansive Soil Stabilization: Mechanisms, Microstructure, and Durability,” Results in Engineering, vol. 28, pp. 1-16, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  42. Nitin Tiwari, Neelima Satyam, and Kundan Singh, “Effect of Curing on Micro-Physical Performance of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced and Silica Fume stabilized Expansive Soil Under Freezing Thawing Cycles,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, pp. 1-16, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  43. Nicolás Griff Zaragoza, and J. Nicolás Zaragoza-Grifé, Recommendations for the Analysis of Unit Prices Oriented to the Control of Work, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Azcapotzalco (UAM-A), 2009.
    [
    Google Scholar]
  44. Nan Jiang et al., “Strength Characteristics and Microstructure of Cement Stabilized Soft Soil Admixed with Silica Fume,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1-11, 1929, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  45. Nitin Tiwari, and Neelima Satyam, “Experimental Study on the Influence of Polypropylene Fiber on the Swelling Pressure Expansion Attributes of Silica Fume Stabilized Clayey Soil,” Geosciences, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1-10, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  46. Muhammad Syamsul Imran Zaini et al., “Experimental Investigations on Physico-Mechanical Properties of Kaolinite Clay Soil Stabilized at Optimum Silica Fume Content Using Clamshell Ash and Lime,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, pp. 1-20, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]