Call For Paper September 2026

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 9 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCE-V13I9P118 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I9P118

Innovative Framework for Social Sustainability Assessment: Focusing on Mosque as Community Hub


Aldyfra Luhulima Lukman, Sahid Sahid, Indri Astrina, Anindhita Nugroho Sunartio

Received Revised Accepted Published
07 May 2026 03 Sep 2026 11 Sep 2026 29 Sep 2026

Citation :

Aldyfra Luhulima Lukman, Sahid Sahid, Indri Astrina, Anindhita Nugroho Sunartio, "Innovative Framework for Social Sustainability Assessment: Focusing on Mosque as Community Hub," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 302-319, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I9P118

Abstract

Discussing contemporary architecture or the built environment is inseparable from the concept of sustainable development. The concept of sustainable development, which encompasses environmental, economic, and social dimensions, has become the basis for responses to current environmental issues, including resource depletion, climate change, pollution, and poverty. Social sustainability is the least discussed among the three dimensions of sustainable development. One of the problems related to the lack of discussion and firm definition of social sustainability is the scarcity of appropriate instruments for assessing social sustainability regarding architectural objects, including mosques. This study intends to provide more definitive terms for developing assessment instruments for the social sustainability of a mosque. This study combines a systematic review and content analysis to formulate the terms. Based on the analysis and synthesis, it can be concluded that the dimension of social sustainability consists of four principles (Collective Attributes, Communal Activities, Clear Aims, and Continuous Advancement) and twelve criteria (Identity, Governance, Facilities, Beliefs and Values, Inclusion and Interaction; Design Approach; Participation; Protection; Flexibility; Well-being and Quality of Life; Social Harmony and Justice; and Continuity). These principles and criteria can be applied to formulate instruments for assessing the social sustainability of a mosque and other buildings' functions and accommodating not only activities but also the development of community activities. The results of this study can be expected to benefit the sustainable development of all communities, not only Muslim communities.

Keywords

Assessment instrument, Community development, Criteria, Mosque, Social sustainability.

References

  1. Swambodo Murdariatmo Adi, and Cynthia Puspitasari, “Mosque as a Model of Learning Principles of Sustainable Architecture,” Journal of Islamic Architecture, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-4, 2016.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  2. Mohamad Tajuddin Haji Mohamad Rasdi, The Mosque as a Community Development Centre: Programme and Architectural Design Guidelines for Contemporary Islam Societies, Johor: UTM, 1998.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. Tayyab Ahmad et al., “Implications of Stereotype Mosque Architecture on Sustainability,” Procedia Engineering, pp. 96-103, 2016.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. Ahmad Mahbub Hamdani, Atiek Suprapti, and Siti Rukayah, “Architecture of the Kajoran Cultural Heritage Mosque Complex and Community Life Surrounding,” Journal of Islamic Architecture, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 270-278, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  5. Eka Rahmat Hidayat, Hasim Danuri, and Yanuar Purwanto, “Ecomasjid: The First Milestone of Sustainable Mosque in Indonesia,” Journal of Islamic Architecture, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20-26, 2018.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  6. Hayu Prabowo, “Ecomasjid: From the Mosque, Nurturing the Earth,” Al-Amanah Sempon Islamic Boarding School Foundation, pp. 1-43, 2017.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  7. Nazirah Zainul Abidin, “Sustainable Construction in Malaysia-Developers’ Awareness,” International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 316-323, 2009.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. Michael Y. Mak, and Clinton J. Peacock, “Social Sustainability: A Comparison of Case Studies in UK, USA and Australia Social Sustainability: A Comparison of Case Studies in UK, USA and Australia Introduction,” 17th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Gold Coast, pp. 1-14, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. Jason F. McLennan, The Philosophy of Sustainable Design, Bainbridge: Ecotone Publishing, 2004.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Daniel E. Williams, Sustainable Design: Ecology, Architecture and Planning, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  11. S. Ricee, “Social Sustainability - Everything you Need to Know,” Diversity for Social Impact, 2021.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  12. Usama Konbr, Mai Elsayed, and Bahaa Elboshy, “A Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Egyptian University Campuses,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1909-1939, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  13. Nicola Dempsey et al., “The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability,” Sustainable Development, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 289-300, 2011.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. Saffron Woodcraft, “Understanding and Measuring Social Sustainability,” Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 133-144, 2015.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  15. Usama Konbr, and Mariam Abdelaal, “Utilizing Smart Systems to Enhance the Sustainability of Egyptian Administrative Buildings,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2779-2808, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  16. Mark Davidson, “Social Sustainability and the City,” Geography Compass, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 872-880, 2010.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Asma Mehan, and Farzaneh Soflaei, Social Sustainability in Urban Context: Concepts, Definitions and Principles, Architectural Research Addressing Societal Challenges, pp. 1-7, 2017.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  18. Usama A. Konbr, “Studying The Indoor Air Pollution Within The Residential Buildings in Egypt as a Factor of Sustainability,” Journal of Engineering Sciences Assiut University Faculty of Engineering, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 722-741, 2017.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  19. Nessa Winston, “Sustainable Community Development: Integrating Social and Environmental Sustainability for Sustainable Housing and Communities,” Sustainable Development, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 191-202, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  20. Wan Mohd Khairul Firdaus Wan Khairuldin et al., “Sustainable Urban Development in Islamic Perspective: A Systematic Synthesis,” Planning Malaysia Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 153-172, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  21. A. Amiruddin et al., “Environmental Fiqh as a Framework for Social Sustainability,” Lantern Human Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 96-110, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  22. Kausar Yasmeen, “Framework for Islamic Social Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 445-474, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  23. Rosmidzatul Azila binti Mat Yamin, “Eco-Mosque: Overview, Potential and Challenges of Implementation in Malaysia,” TAFHIM: IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 77-97, 2021.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  24. Bangun Indrakusumo Radityo Harsritanto et al., “Mosque Design Strategy for Energy and Water Saving,” Open Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 723-733, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  25. Aulia Fikriarini, Dewi Larasati, and Sugeng Triyadi, “Reaching the Understanding of the Green Building Concept in Islamic Value: Thematic Tafseer Study,” Journal of Islamic Architecture, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 321-330, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  26. Siti Syamimi Omar et al., “Green Mosque: A Living Nexus,” Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1-11, 2018.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  27. Try Ramadhan et al., “Implementation of Green Architecture Concept in Mosque Design: A Face And Islamic Da’wah,” Indonesian Journal of Built Environmental and Sustainability, vol. 1, no. 1, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  28. Clara Greed, Christianity and Planning: Pentecostal Churches, Bristol: University of West England, pp. 1-61, 2016.
    [
    Google Scholar]
  29. Thich Thien Nhon, and Thich Thien Nhon, Buddhist Approach to Global Leadership and Shared Responsibilities for Sustainable Societies, Religious Publishing House, pp. 1-725, 2019.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  30. Primož Medve, “The Essence of Neighbourhood Community Centres (NCCs) in European Sustainable Neighbourhoods,” Urban Design International, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 150-167, 2017.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  31. W. Zahrah et al., “Community Centre for Sustainable Communities in Kampung Kota: A Literature Review,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1404, pp. 1-10, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  32. Ahmad Faiq Abd Wahid et al., “Stimulate Social Interaction in the Public Realm,” Built Environment Journal, vol. 21, pp. 346-356, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  33. Wan Noor Anira Wan Ali et al., “An Analytical Study of Mosques and Public Spaces: Integration Space for Spiritual and Community Bonding,” Charting a Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Business and Social Sciences, pp. 237-252, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  34. Julie Rudner, Fatemeh Shahani, and Trevor Hogan, “Islamic Architectures of Self-Inclusion and Assurance in a Multicultural Society,” Fabrications, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 153-175, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  35. Baptiste Brodard, Islamic Social Services in Switzerland: Crossing Religious Boundaries to Benefit Society as a Whole, Islamic Organisations in Western Switzerland. Actors, Networks, and Socio-Cultural Activities, pp. 110-135, 2020.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  36. Cambridge Dictionary, Cambridge University Press & Assessment, 2024.
    [
    Google Scholar]
  37. Standard on Biodiversity Offsets, Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/standard-on-biodiversity-offsets/
  38. Ajla Aksamija, Research Methods for the Architectural Profession, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  39. Mohammad Ikram Mat Sobri et al., “Systematic Review of Sustainable Design Approach For Mosque,” Journal of Islamic Architecture, pp. 369-375, 2021.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  40. Virginia Wilson, “Research Methods: Content Analysis,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 177-179, 2011.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  41. Weijie Zhong, Torsten Schröder, and Juliette Bekkering, “Biophilic Design in Architecture and its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review,” Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 114-141, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  42. Semiha İsmailoglu, and Serkan Sipahi, “Social Sustainability of Cultural Heritage: Erzurum Great Mosque (Atabey Mosque),” Open House International, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 578-594, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  43. Najiha Jaffar, Nor Zalina Harun, and Alias Abdullah, “Enlivening The Mosque As A Public Space For Social Sustainability Of Traditional Malay Settlements,” Planning Malaysia Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 145-157, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  44. Masrul Hayati Kamarulzaman et al., Community- Based Mosque Tourism Model for Sustainable Socioeconomic Growth: A proposed Conceptual study, International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, pp. 16-20, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/498883811/PAGINA-47-Proceedings-Iniic-Conference-1-2020?utm
  45. Mohammad Shokati Amghani et al., “Factors Affecting the Livelihood Sustainability of Smallholder Farmers in Iran,” Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, vol. 26, pp. 1-15, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  46. Zhaina Tolegen et al., “Assessment of Safe Access to Pedestrian Infrastructure Facilities in the City of Almaty, Kazakhstan,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 351-371, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  47. Norman Tyler, Ted J. Ligibel, and Ilene R. Tyler, Historic Preservation: An Introduction to Its History, Principles, and Practice, 2nd ed., Norton & Company, pp. 1-384, 2009.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  48. Zahra Kefayati, and Hamed Moztarzadeh, “Developing Effective Social Sustainability Indicators In Architecture,” Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 40-56, 2015.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  49. Alenxander Ng et al., “Evaluation of Architectural Design Element in Saidina Abu Bakar as Shiddiq Mosque on Social Inclusion,” Journal of Islamic Architecture, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 120-126, 2022.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]