Call For Paper October 2026

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 10 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJECE-V13I10P111 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23488549/IJECE-V13I10P111

Trust-Aware Federated Meta-Learning with Adaptive Privacy and Explainable AI for IoT Healthcare


Sirisha Rani Kolli, Md Zia Ur Rahman

Received Revised Accepted Published
07 Jul 2026 12 Sep 2026 14 Oct 2026 28 Oct 2026

Citation :

Sirisha Rani Kolli, Md Zia Ur Rahman, "Trust-Aware Federated Meta-Learning with Adaptive Privacy and Explainable AI for IoT Healthcare," International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 192-204, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488549/IJECE-V13I10P111

Abstract

The increasing deployment of connected sensing devices in healthcare enables distributed physiological monitoring and data-driven clinical support, but centralized collection of sensitive records creates substantial privacy and security concerns. This paper presents a Trust-Aware Federated Meta-Learning with Adaptive Privacy and Explainable AI (TAFML-XAI) framework for heterogeneous IoT healthcare environments. The framework combines trust-weighted aggregation, adaptive Gaussian differential privacy, Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML), and federated SHAP-based explanations. The trust scores are computed based on the divergence between each client update and the global model, while privacy-preserving perturbations (modes of differential privacy) are imposed on the updates before sending. The revised formulation explicitly analyzes the interaction between privacy noise, trust estimation, and explanation stability. Experiments reported in the manuscript use the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, PPG-DaLiA, and UCI Air Quality datasets. The reported classification accuracy of the proposed framework is 98.61%, while robustness experiments report 97% and 94% accuracy with 10% and 20% noisy/adversarial clients, respectively. The reported meta-learning experiment reduces convergence from 120 to 75 communication rounds and increases personalization accuracy from 88% to 97%. SHAP evaluation reports fidelity of 96.2%, consistency of 94.8%, and feature-importance correlation of 93.5%. The results show that the integrated framework can improve robustness, personalization, privacy-utility control, and interpretability; however, the centralized baseline and resource-overhead measurements require controlled reruns before the final submission.

Keywords

Differential privacy, Explainable AI, Federated learning, IoT healthcare, Meta-Learning, Trust-Aware aggregation.

References

  1. Brendan McMahan et al., “Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data,” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1273-1282, 2017.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  2. Tian Li et al., “Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 50-60, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. Cynthia Dwork, “The Promise of Differential Privacy: A Tutorial on Algorithmic Techniques,” 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Palm Springs, CA, USA, pp. 1-2, 2011.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. Keith Bonawitz et al., “Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Design,” Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 374-388, 2019.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  5. Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton, “Deep Learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444, 2015.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  6. Ashish Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you Need,” Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 6000-6010, 2017.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  7. Cheng Song et al., “Secure and Efficient Federated Learning Schemes for Healthcare Systems,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 1-14, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. Pallavi Dhade, and Prajakta Shirke, “Federated Learning for Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review,” Engineering Proceedings, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. Fan Zhang et al., “Recent Methodological Advances in Federated Learning for Healthcare,” Patterns, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1-16, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Rabia Abid et al., “Adaptation of Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Efficient and Secure E-Healthcare Systems,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 3413-3429, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  11. Md Shahin Ali et al., “Federated Learning in Healthcare: Model Misconducts, Security, Challenges, Applications, and Future Research Directions--A Systematic Review,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-32, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  12. Hao Li et al., “Review on Security of Federated Learning and its Application in Healthcare,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 144, pp. 271-290, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  13. Bo Wang et al., “PPFLHE: A Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Scheme with Homomorphic Encryption for Healthcare Data,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 146, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. Erfan Darzi, Nanna M. Sijtsema, and P.M.A van Ooijen, “Fed-Safe: Securing Federated Learning in Healthcare against Adversarial Attacks,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-15, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  15. Aditya Pribadi Kalapaaking, Ibrahim Khalil, and Xun Yi, “Blockchain-based Federated Learning with SMPC Model Verification Against Poisoning Attack for Healthcare Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 269-280, 2023.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  16. Jiangang Ha, and Tin Kam Ho, “Machine Learning Made Easy: A Review of Scikit-Learn Package in Python Programming Language,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 348-361, 2019.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Scott M. Lundberg, and Suin Lee, “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions,” Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4765-4774, 2017.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  18. Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Ernesto Guestrin, “Why Should I Trust You? Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier,” Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135-1144, 2016.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  19. Kaiming He et al., “Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition,” 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 770-778, 2016.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  20. Jakub Konečný et al., “Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-10, 2016.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  21. Vinothkumar Kolluru et al., “Healthcare through AI: Integrating Deep Learning, Federated Learning, and XAI for Disease Management,” International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 21-30, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  22. Pietro Ducange et al., “Federated Learning of XAI Models in Healthcare: A Case Study on Parkinson’s Disease,” Cognitive Computation, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3051-3076, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  23. Tanisha Bhardwaj, and K. Sumangali, “A Federated Incremental Blockchain Framework with Privacy Preserving XAI Optimization for Securing Healthcare Data,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-25, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  24. Amara Miloudi et al., “Federated Learning in Healthcare: Recent Progress and Challenges,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 131, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  25. Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine, “Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks,” Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 70, pp. 1126-1135, 2017.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  26. Martin Abadi et al., “Deep Learning with Differential Privacy,” Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 308-318, 2016.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  27. Heyi Zhang et al., “Building Trust Beyond Update Divergence: Dual-Refined Aggregation for Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 21, pp. 1287-1299, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  28. Xiaoqiang Gui et al., “Sophon: Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning via Dual Trust Mechanism,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 5906-5917, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]