Innovation, Technology Transfer and North - South Trade

International Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2016 by SSRG - IJEMS Journal
Volume 3 Issue 6
Year of Publication : 2016
Authors : Atreyee Sinha Chakraborty
pdf
How to Cite?

Atreyee Sinha Chakraborty, "Innovation, Technology Transfer and North - South Trade," SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, vol. 3,  no. 6, pp. 11-15, 2016. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V3I4P113

Abstract:

 The paper describes a simple theoretical model to show the effect of (cost reducing) innovation by Northern firm in North-South trade and uses a simple game theoretic framework to show that the optimum Strategy by North as well as South depend on the cost as well as benefit of innovation and the patent regime offered by South

Keywords:

Innovation, Technology Transfer, Imitation, Loyalty payment, Export, Autarky, North- South Trade.

References:

[1] Azevedo, M., Silva, S. and Afonso, O. (2012). Intellectual Property Rights and Endogenous Economic Growth – Uncovering the Main Gaps in the Research Agenda. Aurora A. C. Teixeira (ed.), Technological Change, InTech, chapter 3, 45–64.
[2] Chin, J. C. and Grossman, G.M. (1990). Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade. Jones R. W. and Krueger, A. O. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade, Essays in Honor of R. E. Baldwin (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) pp. 90 – 107.
[3] Deardorff, A. V. (1992).Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection. Economica, 59, pp. 35 – 51.
[4] Diwan, I. and Rodrik, D. (1991).Patents, Appropriate Technology and North-South Trade. Journal of International Economics, 30, pp. 27 – 47.
[5] Fosfuri, A. (2000).Patent Protection, Imitation and the Mode of Technology Transfer. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, pp. 1129 – 1149.
[6] Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Endogenous Product Cycles. The Economic Journal, 101, pp. 1214 – 1229.
[7] Helpman, E., (1993).Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights. Econometrica, 61(6): 1247-1280.
[8] Segerstrom, P., T. C. A. Anant and E. Dinopoulos, 1990. ‗A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle‘, American Economic Review 80(5): 1077-1091.
[9] Sinha,U.B. (2001).Patent Protection, Innovation Rate and Welfare. Working Paper No.0106,Department of Economics, National University of Singapore
[10] Sinha, U. B., (2006).Patent Enforcement, Innovation and Welfare. Journal of Economics (ZeitschriftfürNationalokonomie), 8, pp. 211 – 241.
[11] Taylor, M. S.(1994).TRIPS, Trade and Growth. International Economic Review, 35, pp. 361 – 381
[12] Vishwarsrao, S.(1999). Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights and Product versus Process Innovation.AEJ: Dec 1999, Vol.27, No 4