Relationship Conflict and Affect States of the Employees: Role of Perceived Relationship Conflict Importance

International Journal of Economics and Management Studies
© 2016 by SSRG - IJEMS Journal
Volume 3 Issue 11
Year of Publication : 2016
Authors : Vijay Kuriakose, Heera Jose
pdf
How to Cite?

Vijay Kuriakose, Heera Jose, "Relationship Conflict and Affect States of the Employees: Role of Perceived Relationship Conflict Importance," SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, vol. 3,  no. 11, pp. 1-5, 2016. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V3I6P106

Abstract:

This paper empirically tries to establish the relationship between relationship conflicts at the work place and affect states of the individual. Relationship conflict at workplace is detrimental to individuals, groups and organisations. Relationship conflict has various individual and organisational level outcomes. Affect states of the individual can influence various individual behaviours. Researches in the conflict domain have considered conflict as a rational process and avoided affect related variables. Hence, this study tries to fill this gap. Standard questionnaires were used for data collection. Data have been collected from 140 IT engineers working in Kerala. Simple linear regression and moderation regression analysis were used for analysis. The result revealed that there is no significant relationship between relationship conflict and positive affect. However, there exists significant relationship between relationship conflict and negative affect. To understand the role of perceived relationship conflict importance moderation regression analysis was done. The analysis proved the moderating role of perceived relationship conflict importance in the relationship conflict – negative affect relationship. Thus the study has proved relationship conflict can increase the negative affect and perceiving relationship conflict as important can increase the negative affect of the individual and vice versa. The study has also proved relationship conflict does not create positive affect in individual. Hence, to reduce the negative impact of relationship conflict HR managers should avoid the number of individuals involving in conflict situation.

Keywords:

Relationship conflict, positive affect, negative affect relationship conflict importance.

References:

1) Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. book, Sage.
2) Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148. article.
3) Argyle, M., & Furnham, A. (1983). Sources of satisfaction and conflict in long-term relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 481–493. article.
4) Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497. article.
5) Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723. article.
6) De Dreu, C. K. W., & de Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations. book, Sage.
7) De Dreu, C. K. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (2008). Conflict in the workplace: Sources, functions, and dynamics across multiple levels of analysis. article.
8) De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741. article.
9) Deutsch, M. (1969). Socially relevant science: Reflections on some studies of interpersonal conflict. American Psychologist, 24(12), 1076–1092. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0028993
10) Dijkstra, M. T. M., Dierendonck, D. Van, Evers, A., & Dreu, C. K. W. De. (2005). Conflict and well-being at work: the moderating role of personality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(2), 87–104. http://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510579740
11) Evan, W. M. (1965). Conflict and performance in R & D organizations. IMR; Industrial Management Review (Pre- 1986), 7(1), 35. article.
12) Fyson, S. J. (1999). Developing and applying concepts about community: Reflections from the field. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(3), 347–365. article.
13) Gutman, L. M., Sameroff, A. J., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The academic achievement of African American students during early adolescence: An examination of multiple risk, promotive, and protective factors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(3), 367–399. article.
14) Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45–99. article.
15) Janssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25(2), 117–141. article.
16) Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of valuebased intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 223–238. article.
17) Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 256–282. article.
18) Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465–495. article.
19) Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. article.
20) Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763. article.
21) Kelly, J. A., & Hansen, D. J. (1987). Social interactions and adjustment. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 131–146. article.
22) Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Grohmann, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2011). Task and relationship conflict at work: Construct validation of a German version of Jehn’s intragroup conflict scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 171–178. http://doi.org/10.1027/1015- 5759/a000064
23) Lonczak, H. S., Huang, B., Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., Abbott, R. D., … Kosterman, R. (2001). The social predictors of adolescent alcohol misuse: A test of the social development model. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(2), 179. article.
24) McCarthy, M. E., Pretty, G. M., & Catano, V. (1990). Psychological sense of community and student burnout. Journal of College Student Development. article.
25) Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational Concepts and Conflict : Models Three types of conflict among the subunits of formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2), 296–320. http://doi.org/10.2307/2391553
26) Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. book, Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
27) Royal, M. A., & Rossi, R. J. (1996). Individual-level correlates of sense of community: Findings from workplace and school. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 395–416. article.
28) Semmer, N. K., Jacobshagen, N., Meier, L. L., & Elfering, A. (2007). Occupational stress research: The “stress-asoffense- to-self” perspective. Occupational Health Psychology: European Perspectives on Research, Education and Practice, 2, 43–60. article.
29) Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111. http://doi.org/10.5465/APBPP.1998.27667017
30) Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 501–524. article.
31) Wall, J. A., & Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21(3), 515–558. article.
32) Watson, D., Clark, L. a., & Tellegan, a. (1988). Worksheet 3.1 The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) PANAS Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063– 1070.