Citation :

Siya Jain, "The Geography of Everyday Exclusion: Third Spaces and Occupational Inequality in Delhi NCR," International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 60-71, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V13I4P107

Abstract

Third spaces that sit between home (first space) and work (second space) are often described as neutral ground that is open and accessible to everyone. This study questions that assumption in the context of Delhi NCR (Delhi, Noida, Gurgaon, Ghaziabad), asking whether formal and informal (precarious) workers experience and access these spaces on equal terms. A structured questionnaire including largely quantitative questions was designed and administered to 116 workers, comprising 50 formal and 66 informal workers (6 of which were freelancers and business owners), and covered which spaces they used, how often, what limited their access, and how they felt within two categories of third spaces: formal commercial venues (malls, restaurants, gyms, etc) and informal public ones (street markets, food stalls, tea stalls, etc). Responses were analysed using Mann-Whitney U tests for the Likert-scale measures and chi-square tests with Cramer’s V for categorical data. The two groups were found to inhabit largely separate spatial worlds, with formal workers concentrated in commercial venues and informal workers gravitating toward tea stalls and street markets. Informal workers rated commercial spaces as significantly less affordable and less safe, largely interpreted not as physical safety but rather mental security, yet reported no greater sense of being unwelcome or judged, which locates the barrier in cost and security rather than belonging. Access to informal public spaces, by contrast, did not differ between groups. The exclusion is therefore selective, targeted at the commercial sphere rather than spread across the city. In addition, time poverty was found to be one of the biggest limiting factors to accessing both kinds of spaces for both groups, indicating that long working hours, regardless of other factors, are a root cause for third-space inaccessibility. Thus, these findings reframe third-space inequality as a structural problem of time and money, and point to everyday public spaces as undervalued sites of social mixing worth protecting.

Keywords

Urban Spaces, Formal Workers, Informal Workers, Third Space, Socioeconomic Class.

References

1. Syed Sameed Ahmed, Wafiyah Karamath Basha, and Aastha Govind Shirodker, “A Pilot Study on Socioeconomic Determinants of Urban Safety Perceptions among Young Adults in India,” International Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 266-283, 2025.
   [CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
2. Rebecca Aldrich et al., “(Re)making ‘Third Places’ in Precarious Times: Conceptual, Empirical, and Practical Opportunities for Occupational Science,” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. pp. 721-739, 2023.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
3. Eduardo B. Andrade, Why do Poorer Consumers often Pay more?, Imperial Business School, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/business-school/ib-knowledge/marketing/why-do-poorer-consumers-often-pay-more/
4. Elena Bardasi, and Quentin Wodon, “Working Long Hours and Having No Choice: Time Poverty in Guinea,” Feminist Economics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 45-78, 2010.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
5. Richard Bedford, “Thirdspace. Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real‐and‐Imagined Places by Edward W. Soja,” New Zealand Geographer, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 48-49, 1998.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
6. Michael Bittman, “Social Participation and Family Welfare: The Money and Time Costs of Leisure in Australia,” Social Policy and Administration, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 408-425, 2002.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
7. Elizabeth W. Chan, Felix Cheung, and Michael J. Widener, “Leisure for Whom? Socioeconomic Disparities in the Well-being Benefits of Third Places,” Wellbeing Space and Society, vol. 10, pp. 1-8, 2026.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
8. Stella Chatzitheochari, and Sara Arber, “Class, Gender and Time Poverty: A Time‐use Analysis of British Workers’ Free Time Resources,” British Journal of Sociology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 451-471, 2012.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
9. Veronique Dupont, “Socio-spatial Differentiation and Residential Segregation in Delhi: A Question of Scale?,” Geoforum, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 157-175, 2004.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
10. Leela Fernandes, and Patrick Heller, “Hegemonic Aspirations: New Middle Clas Politics and India’s Democracy in Comparative Perspective,” Critical Asian Studies, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 495-522, 2006.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
11. Jessica Finlay et al., “Closure of ‘Third Places’? Exploring Potential Consequences for Collective Health and Wellbeing,” Health and Place, vol. 60, 2019.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
12. John Flint, “Surveillance and Exclusion Practices in the Governance of Access to Shopping Centres on Periphery Estates in the UK,” Surveillance and Society, vol. 4, no. 1/2, pp. 52-68, 2006.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
13. Govindan Raveendran, and Joann Vanek, Informal Workers in India: A Statistical Profile, WIEGO Statistical Brief 24, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kevin Fan Hsu, “Reframing Public Spaces: from Recreational Amenity to Civic Good in Resilient Cities: COVID-19 Offers an Opportunity to Re-evaluate Neighbourhood Spaces to Ensure they are Available to All,” The Journal of Public Space, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 67-82, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
15. Leo W. Jeffres et al., “The Impact of Third Places on Community Quality of Life,” Applied Research in Quality of Life, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 333-345, 2009.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
16. Sytze F. Kingma, “The Constitution of ‘Third Workspaces’ in Between the Home and The Corporate Office,” New Technology Work and Employment, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 176-193, 2016.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
17. Narae Lee, “Third Place and Psychological Well-being: The Psychological Benefits of Eating and Drinking Places for University Students in Southern California, USA,” Cities, vol. 131, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
18. Setha Low, and Neil Smith, The Politics of Public Space, 1^st ed., Routledge, 2006.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
19. OSF, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/3ycrb_v1
20. James Petty, “The London Spikes Controversy: Homelessness, Urban Securitisation and the Question of ‘Hostile Architecture’,” International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 67-81, 2016.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
21. Mathew Carmona, Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design, 3^rd ed., Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
22. Jie Qi, Suvodeep Mazumdar, and Ana C. Vasconcelos, “Understanding the Relationship between Urban Public Space and Social Cohesion: A Systematic Review,” International Journal of Community Well-Being, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 155-212, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
23. Valeriya Radomskaya, and Abhishek Singh Bhati, “Hawker Centres: A Social Space Approach to Promoting Community Wellbeing,” Urban Planning, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 167-178, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
24. Ignacio Ramos‐Vidal, and Elsy Dominguez De La Ossa, “A Systematic Review to Determine the Role of Public Space and Urban Design on Sense of Community,” International Social Science Journal, vol. 74, no. 252, pp. 633-655, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
25. Danielle Rhubart et al., “Sociospatial Disparities in “Third Place” Availability in the United States,” Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, vol. 8, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
26. Debbie Laliberte Rudman, and Rebecca M. Aldrich, “Social Isolation, Third Places, and Precarious Employment Circumstances: A Scoping Review,” Western University Canada, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
27. Debbie Laliberte Rudman et al., “Third Places in Precarious Workers’ Lives: A Scoping Review of Associated Social Experiences and Outcomes,” Contemporary Social Science, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 599-617, 2023.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
28. Anna Olivia Nicolina Svensdotter, “Border Nomads: An Architectural Investigation of Transient Public Urban Place,” Phd. Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2021.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
29. Table 1 Oldenburg’s (1999) Eight Characteristics of “Third Places”. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Oldenburgs-1999-eight-characteristics-of-third-places_tbl1_227515447
30. Ray Oldenburg, The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How they get you through the Day, Paragon House, New York, 1991. [Online]. Available: https://archive.org/details/greatgoodplaceca0000olde
31. Surinder S. Jodhka, Aseem Prakash, The Indian Middle Class, Oxford University Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]