Call For Paper October 2026

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 5 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJHSS-V13I5P103 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V13I5P103

Emotion, Judgment, and Musical Experience: A Comparative Study of Rasa Theory and Kantian Aesthetics


Md. Asad

Received Revised Accepted Published
01 Aug 2026 02 Sep 2026 17 Sep 2026 05 Oct 2026

Citation :

Md. Asad, "Emotion, Judgment, and Musical Experience: A Comparative Study of Rasa Theory and Kantian Aesthetics," International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 21-31, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V13I5P103

Abstract

Musical experience touches upon a level of human consciousness where emotion and judgement are inextricably linked. However, Eastern and Western philosophical traditions have taken different approaches to explaining this experience. While existing studies have analysed Indian and Kantian aesthetics separately, a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the two approaches focusing on musical experience has so far been lacking. This study aims to address this by developing a dialogical aesthetic framework through textual and interpretive analyses of Bharata Muni’s Nāṭyaśāstra, Abhinavagupta’s Abhinav Bharati, and Kant’s Critique of Judgement. The analysis shows that the sādhāraṇīkaraṇa of aesthetics, the transformation of personal emotion into universal aesthetic experience, and the Kantian idea of subjective universality, the claim of universal validity of personal aesthetic judgement through the sensus communis, are two deeply parallel but different philosophical insights. The study also reveals that musical experience has two complementary dimensions: a dimension of affective and evaluative content related to the Rasa theory and a dimension of reflective aesthetic judgment related to Kant’s aesthetics. These two dimensions prove to be intertwined in the aesthetic experience. This integrated approach opens new analytical possibilities in comparative music aesthetics and provides a theoretical basis for future empirical music psychology and cross-cultural aesthetic research.

Keywords

Comparative Aesthetics, Kantian Aesthetics, Musical Experience, Rasattva, Subjective universality.

References

  1. Manomohan Ghosh, The Nāṭyaśāstra ascribed to Bharata-Muni, Calcutta, vol. 272, no. 1559, 1951. [Online]. Available: https://cdn.angkordatabase.asia/libs/docs/natyashastra-english-manomohan-ghosh-2vol-ADB-red.pdf
  2. Immanuel Kant, Critique of the Power of Judgment, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. Paul Guyer, Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. Abhinavagupta, Abhinavagupta’s Abhinavabhāratī: Selected Studies and Translations, Motilal Banarsidass, 2022.
    [Publisher Link]
  5. Bharata Muni, Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharatamuni: With the Commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Abhinavaguptācārya, vol. 1, 1992.
    [Publisher Link]
  6. Elvira Brattico, Brigitte Bogert, and Thomas Jacobsen, “Toward a Neural Chronometry for the Aesthetic Experience of Music,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 4, 2013.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  7. Mark Reybrouck, and Tuomas Eerola, “Music and its Inductive Power: A Psychobiological and Evolutionary Approach to Musical Emotions,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 2017.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. Sheldon Pollock, A Rasa Reader: Classical Indian Aesthetics, Columbia University Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, The Transformation of Nature in Art, Dover Publications, 1934.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Daiva Tamošaitytė, “Rasa Concept in the Aesthetics of Classical Indian Music,” Acta Orientalia Vilnensia, vol. 1, pp. 183-200, 2000.
    [CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
  11. V. Raghavan, The Number of Rasa-s, Adyar Library and Research Centre, Madras, 1967.
    [Publisher Link]
  12. Helmut Leder et al., “A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments,” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 489-508, 2004.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  13. Marcel Zentner, Didier Grandjean, and Klaus R. Scherer, “Emotions Evoked by the Sound of Music: Characterization, Classification, and Measurement,” Emotion, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 494-521, 2008.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. N.A. Jairazbhoy, The Rāgs of North Indian Music: Their Structure and Evolution, Popular Prakashan, 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Henry E. Allison, Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
    [
    CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
  16. Stefan Koelsch, “Brain Correlates of Music-evoked Emotions,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 170-180, 2014.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Thomas Fritz et al., “Universal Recognition of Three Basic Emotions in Music,” Current Biology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 573-576, 2009.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  18. Hannah Ginsbrog, “Kant’s Aesthetics and Teleology,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2023.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  19. Raniero Gnoli, The Aesthetic Experience According to Abhinavagupta, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office, 1968.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  20. David Huron, Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation, MIT Press, 2006.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  21. Nicholas Cook, Music: A Very Short Introduction, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2021.
    [
    Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]