Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 4 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJME-V13I4P108 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V13I4P108Decoding Lean with Industry 4.0 Transformation: A Model comprising of ROI, Operational Efficiency and Human Capability as Systemic Success Factors in Indian Manufacturing setup
Dhaval Birajdar, Hari Vasudevan
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Jan 2026 | 26 Feb 2026 | 25 Mar 2026 | 29 Apr 2026 |
Citation :
Dhaval Birajdar, Hari Vasudevan, "Decoding Lean with Industry 4.0 Transformation: A Model comprising of ROI, Operational Efficiency and Human Capability as Systemic Success Factors in Indian Manufacturing setup," International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 97-105, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V13I4P108
Abstract
The production processes can be improved by integrating the Lean Manufacturing principles with Industry 4.0 technologies. It helps an organization to stay competitive in the long run. In this paper, the DEMATEL approach was used to analyze the interrelationships among nineteen Critical Success Factors (CSFs) that affect the optimal integration of Lean and Industry 4.0. The direct-relation matrix estimated from expert evaluation revealed that the ROI and Operational Efficiency are the most critical CSFs. It was observed that the Top Management Support has a greater causal significance. It indicates that the commitment of leadership is paramount in driving strategic orientation and resource deployment in such transformation initiatives. The results show a balanced system with ten causal and nine effect factors. The causality factors primarily comprise considerations of financial and operational performance and innovation capacity as the fundamental motivators for Lean–Industry 4.0 integration. On the contrary, human resource development and organisational culture present themselves as significant effect factors as domains that require constant and active reflection once strategic and operational underpinning have been established. The research presents a practical perspective for manufacturing companies seeking to create clear pathways in their Lean–Industry 4.0 adoptions to align technology development with human resource capability generation.
Keywords
DEMATEL, Lean Manufacturing, Industry 4.0, Critical Success Factors, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Manufacturing Integration, Causal Analysis.
References
- Adam Sanders, Chola Elangeswaran, and Jens Wulfsberg, “Industry 4.0 Implies Lean Manufacturing: Research Activities in Industry 4.0 Function as Enablers for Lean Manufacturing,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 811-833, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Sven-Vegard Buer, Jan Ola Strandhagen, and Felix T.S. Chan, “The Link Between Industry 4.0 and Lean Manufacturing: Mapping Current Research and Establishing a Research Agenda,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2924-2940, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Guilherme Luz Tortorella, and Diego Fettermann, “Implementation of Industry 4.0 and Lean Production in Brazilian Manufacturing Companies,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2975-2987, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Sheng-Li Si et al., “DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State‐of‐the‐Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, no. 1, pp. 1-33, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - İlker Gölcük, and Adil Baykasoğlu, “An Analysis of DEMATEL Approaches for Criteria Interaction Handling within ANP,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 46, pp. 346-366, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - J.P Womack, and D.T Jones, “Lean Thinking—Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1148-1148, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - J. Liker, and L. Attolico, Toyota Way per la Lean Leadership: Achieving and Maintaining Excellence in the Company, Hoepli, pp. 1-320, 2015.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Peter Hines, and Nick Rich, “The Seven Value Stream Mapping Tools,” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 46-64, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Rachna Shah, and Peter T. Ward, “Lean Manufacturing: Context, Practice Bundles, and Performance,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 129-149, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Peter Hines, Matthias Holweg, and Nick Rich, “Learning to Evolve: A Review of Contemporary Lean Thinking,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 994-1011, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Dennis Kolberg, Joshua Knobloch, and Detlef Zühlke, “Towards a Lean Automation Interface for Workstations,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 2845-2856, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Heiner Lasi et al., “Industry 4.0,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 239-242, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Jay Lee et al., “Introduction to Cyber Manufacturing,” Manufacturing Letters, vol. 8, pp. 11-15, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - L. Monostori et al., “Cyber-Physical Systems in Manufacturing,” CIRP Annals, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 621-641, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Shiyong Wang et al., “Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Guilherme Luz Tortorella et al., “Lean Manufacturing Implementation: Leadership Styles and Contextual Variables,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1205-1227, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Matteo Rossini et al., “The Interrelation between Industry 4.0 and Lean Production: An Empirical Study on European Manufacturers,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 102, pp. 3963-3976, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Francesco Longo, Antonio Padovano, and Steven Umbrello, “Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1-25, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Fernando E. Garcia-Muiña et al., “The Paradigms of Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy as Enabling Drivers for the Competitiveness of Businesses and Territories: The Case of an Italian Ceramic,” Social Sciences, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1-31, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Julian Marius Müller, Daniel Kiel, and Kai-Ingo Voigt, “What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Kannan Govindan, Sachin Kumar Mangla, and Sunil Luthra, “Prioritising Indicators in Improving Supply Chain Performance using Fuzzy AHP: Insights from the Case Example of Four Indian Manufacturing Companies,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 28, no. 6-8, pp. 552-573, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Yu-Jing Chiu et al., “Marketing Strategy based on Customer Behaviour for the LCD-TV,” International Journal of Management and Decision Making, vol. 7, no. 2-3, pp. 143-165, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] - Michael Sony, and Subhash Naik, “Green Lean Six Sigma Implementation Framework: A Case of Reducing Graphite and Dust Pollution,” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 184-193, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]