Developing a Method to Ease Selection of Cloud Amenity Providers

International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering
© 2016 by SSRG - IJCSE Journal
Volume 3 Issue 4
Year of Publication : 2016
Authors : A.M.Rangaraj, K.Anil Kumar

pdf
Citation:
MLA Style:

A.M.Rangaraj, K.Anil Kumar, "Developing a Method to Ease Selection of Cloud Amenity Providers" SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering 3.4 (2016): 5-8.

APA Style:

A.M.Rangaraj, K.Anil Kumar, (2016). Developing a Method to Ease Selection of Cloud Amenity Providers. SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering 3.4, 5-8.

Abstract:

Distributed multiplexing so as to compute encourages better asset use the same physical asset among a few inhabitants. Client does not need to oversee and look after servers, and thusly, utilizes the assets of cloud supplier as administrations, and is charged agreeing to pay-as-you-use model. Cloud commercial center saw successive rise of new administration suppliers with comparable offerings because of quick innovative progressions, Service level understandings (SLAs), which record ensured nature of administration levels, have not been observed to be reliable among suppliers, despite the fact that they offer administrations with comparable usefulness. In administration outsourcing cloud situations, the nature of administration levels are of prime significance to clients, as they utilize outsider cloud administrations to store and process their customers' information. On the off chance that loss of information happens because of a blackout, the client's business gets influenced. Along these lines, the real test for a client is to choose a suitable administration supplier to guarantee ensured administration.

References:

[1] Y. Chen, V. Paxson, and R. H. Katz, “What’s new about cloud computing security,” EECS Dept., Univ. California, Berkeley, CA,USA, Tech. Rep. UCB/EECS-2010-5, Jan. 20, 2010.
[2] S. K. Habib, S. Ries, and M. Muhlhauser, “Towards a trust man-agement system for cloud computing,” inProc. IEEE 10th Int.Conf.Trust, Secur.Privacy Comput.Commun., 2011, pp. 933– 939.
[3] K. M. Khan and Q. Malluhi, “Establishing trust in cloud computing,”IT Prof., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 20–27, Oct. 2010.
[4] J. Lin, C. Chen, and J. Chang, “Qos-aware data replication for data intensive applications in cloud computing systems,” IEEE Trans.CloudComput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 101–115, Jan.–Jun. 2013.
[5] D. Gambetta, “Can we trust trust?” inTrust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, D. Gambetta, Ed. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell,1990, ch. 13, pp. 213–237.
[6] D. H. Mcknight and N. L. Chervany, “The meanings of trust,”Manage. Inf. Syst. Res. Center, Univ. Minnesota, Minneapolis,MN, USA, Tech. Rep. MISRC Working Paper Series 96-04, 1996.
[7] D. Manchala, “Trust metrics, models and protocols for electronic commerce transactions,” inProc. 18th Int. Conf. Distrib.Comput.Syst., 1998, pp. 312–321.
[8] A. Jøsang and S. L. Presti, “Analysing the relationship between risk and trust,” inProc.2nd Int. Conf. Trust Manage., Mar. 2004, pp.135–145.
[9] L. Freeman, “Centrality on social networks,” Social Netw., vol. 1,pp. 215–239, 1979.
[10] T. Grandison and M. Sloman, “A survey of trust in internet applications,”IEEECommun.Surv. Tutorials, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 2– 16, Fourth Quarter 2000.
[11] A. Jøsang, R. Ismail, and C. Boyd, “A survey of trust and reputa-tion systems for online service provision,” Decision Support Sys.,vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 618–644, Mar. 2007.
[12] P. Resnick and R. Zeckhauser, “Trust among strangers in internettransactions: Empirical analysis of ebay’s reputation system,” in The Economics of the Internet and ECommerce, series Advances in. Applied Microeconomics, vol. 11, M. Baye, Ed. Amsterdam,The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2002, pp. 127–157
[13] A. Withby, A. Jøsang, and J. Indulska, “Filtering out unfair ratings in Bayesian reputation systems,” in Proc. 7th Int. Workshop Trust Agent Soc., 2004, pp. 1–13.
[14] B. Yu and M. P. Singh, “An evidential model of distributed repu-tation management,” in Proc. 1st Int. Joint Conf. Autonom. Agents Multiagent Syst.: Part 1, Jul. 2002, pp. 294–301.
[15] A. Jøsang, “A logic for uncertain probabilities,” Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst.,vol.9,no.3,pp.279–311,Jun. 2001.

Key Words:

Along these lines, the real test for a client is to choose a suitable administration supplier to guarantee ensured administration.