Citation :

Ahdallah Ajdid, Nezha Lamdouar, Azzedine Bouyahyaoui, Amador Teran-Gilmore, "Seismic Vulnerability of Waffle Slab Systems: Nonlinear Dynamic Assessment and Development of a Slab Seismic Fragility Index (SSFI)," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 342-361, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I8P121

Abstract

Waffle slabs are widely used in modern construction because they can span large distances while reducing material consumption and overall structural weight. Despite these advantages, their relatively low lateral stiffness can become a major source of seismic vulnerability, especially when simplified assumptions such as the rigid diaphragm model are adopted in structural analysis. This study examines the seismic response of waffle slab systems, with particular attention to the influence of diaphragm flexibility on displacement amplification and damage concentration around slab–column connections. The findings indicate that inadequate in-plane stiffness can generate excessive interstory drift, dynamic amplification effects, and progressive deterioration of slab–column interfaces, ultimately reducing the overall seismic performance of the structure. The research combines previous literature, post-earthquake observations, and advanced numerical simulations to identify the main mechanisms responsible for seismic vulnerability in waffle slab structures. Reported damage patterns include extensive cracking, formation of plastic hinges, bond degradation, and progressive punching shear failure, which in severe cases may result in partial or complete collapse. To better evaluate these effects, an advanced numerical framework is proposed to assess the seismic capacity of waffle slabs and investigate the causes of their reduced lateral stiffness. In addition, a Seismic Fragility Index for Slabs (SSFI) is introduced to quantify vulnerability and classify waffle slab systems according to regional seismic hazard levels. The adopted methodology integrates modal analysis, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis, and nonlinear time-history simulations. A comparison between rigid and flexible diaphragm models highlights the significant influence of slab flexibility on both the overall seismic response and the distribution of structural damage. The findings show that adopting the rigid diaphragm assumption can substantially underestimate displacement demands and overlook critical failure mechanisms, resulting in unconservative seismic evaluations and an increased probability of structural failure.

Keywords

Waffle slabs, Seismic performance, Diaphragm flexibility, Lateral drift, Punching shear, Nonlinear analysis, Structural vulnerability, Stiffness degradation, Energy dissipation.

References

1. Mario E. Rodriguez, Sergio Santiago, and Roberto Meli, “Seismic Load Tests on Two-Story Waffle–Flat-Plate Structure,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 1287-1293, 1995.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
2. Amadeo Benavent-Climent, Jesús Donaire-Avila, and Elena Oliver-Saiz, “Shaking Table Tests of a Reinforced Concrete Waffle–Flat Plate Structure Designed Following Modern Codes: Seismic Performance and Damage Evaluation,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 315-336, 2016.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
3. Amadeo Benavent-Climent, David Galé-Lamuela, and Jesús Donaire-Avila, “Energy Capacity and Seismic Performance of RC Waffle–Flat Plate Structures under Two Components of Far-Field Ground Motions: Shake-Table Tests,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 949-969, 2019.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
4. David Galé-Lamuela, Jesús Donaire-Ávila, and Amadeo Benavent-Climent, “Energy Dissipation Capacity for Waffle-Flat-Plate Structures Subjected to Bi-Directional Seismic Loadings,” Engineering Structures, vol. 248, pp. 1-16, 2021.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
5. Jesús Donaire-Ávila, and David Galé-Lamuela, “Energy Capacity of Waffle-Flat-Plate Structures with Hysteretic Dampers Subjected to Bidirectional Seismic Loadings,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-25, 2020.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
6. Amadeo Benavent-Climent et al., “Shake Table Tests on a Reinforced Concrete Waffle-Flat Plate Structure with New Hybrid Energy Dissipation Devices,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 727-749, 2023.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
7. A. Catalán Goñi, X. Cahís I Carola, and A. Benavent-Climent, “Vulnerability / Seismic Performance of Older RC Waffle Flat-Plate Systems in A Low-To-Moderate-Seismicity Region,” Proceedings of the 14^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE), Beijing, China, pp. 1-8, 2008.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
8. Amadeo Benavent-Climent, David Galé-Lamuela, and Jesús Donaire-Avila, “Seismic Capacity and Performance of Waffle-Flat Plate Structures under Near-Fault Ground Motions: Bidirectional Shake Table Tests,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 3069-3089, 2025.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
9. Vitelmo V. Bertero, Stephen A. Mahin, and Ricardo A. Herrera, “Aseismic Design Implications of Near-Fault San Fernando Earthquake Records,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31-42, 1978.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
10. R. Meli, and E. Rosenblueth, “The 1985 Earthquake: Causes and Effects in Mexico City,” Concrete International, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 23-34, 1986.
    [Google Scholar]
11. “Learning From Earthquakes: Earthquake Strikes in Guerrero, Mexico,” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, vol. 29, no. 11, 1995.
    [Publisher Link]
12. National Research Council: Engineering Aspects of the September 19, 1985 Mexico Earthquake, National Academies Press, 1987.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
13. M. Altug Erberik, and Amr S. Elnashai, “Fragility Analysis of Flat-Slab Structures,” Engineering Structures, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 937-948, 2004.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
14. A. Benavent-Climent, X. Cahís, and A. Catalán, “Seismic Behavior of Interior Connections in Existing Waffle-Flat-Plate Structures,” Engineering Structures, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2510-2516, 2008.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
15. Erkan Çelebi, and Osman Kırtel, “Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Framed Buildings with Ribbed Slabs at the Affected Region by 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 23, pp. 3623-3646, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
16. S.A. Anagnostopolous et al., “The Kalamata, Greece Earthquake of September 13, 1986,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 333-384, 1986.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
17. N.N. Ambraseys, and J. A. Jackson, “Seismicity and Associated Strain of Central Greece between 1890 and 1988,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 663-695, 1990.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
18. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, (EN 1998-1). British Standard, CEN, Brussel, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.civilenghub.com/NewSamples/BSI/147397538/BS-EN-1998-2-2005-A2-2011-1.pdf
19. ACI CODE-318-19(22): Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute Committee, pp. 1-624, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.concrete.org/store/productdetail.aspx?ItemID=318U19&Language=English&Units=US_Units
20. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
21. Anil K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, pp. 1-960, 2017.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
22. Simone Baldassi et al., “Modeling of in-Plane Floor Flexibility in Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings,” Structures, vol. 69, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
23. Roshen Joseph et al., “Improving the Seismic Response of Existing Shear Wall Structures through Experimentally Validated High-Performance RC Retrofit,” Structures, vol. 70, pp. 1-17, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]