Citation :

S Satish, Urmila R. Kawade, Harish ML, Amey Raju Khedikar, Shubhalakshmi B S, Deepak Mehra, Prashant Sunagar, "Mechanical Performance and Embodied Energy Assessment of Geopolymer-Stabilized Earthen Masonry Blocks Incorporating Gold Mine Tailings and Tank Bed Soil," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 414-430, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I8P125

Abstract

Due to its contributions to the emission of greenhouse gases, the depletion of topsoil, and the consumption of non-renewable energy resources, the fired clay brick industry is under considerable scrutiny. The investigation of unfired Geopolymer-Stabilized Earthen Bricks (GSEBs) with binder matrices comprised of Class F fly ash and Alccofine 1203 and alkali activators of 6 M NaOH and Na₂SiO₃ in a 1:2.5 molar ratio, using Tank Bed Soil (TBS) and Gold Mine Tailings (GMT) as the primary aggregates in each brick, revealed that the blocks produced with the optimized mix of Binder:Liquid:TBS:GMT = 1:0.3:1.8:1.2, cured in an oven at 58°C for seven days achieved compressive strengths between 6.8 and 11.3 MPa - values that meet the minimum requirement of 3.5 MPa for first-class masonry blocks and compete with fired clay bricks. Geotechnical analyses of the aggregates and the produced GSEBs are presented. A modified cradle-to-gate assessment produced an estimated embodied energy of 1,150 MJ/m³ under the stated waste-allocation, process-energy and scale-normalized oven-curing assumptions. This value was approximately 54.3% lower than the adopted historical benchmark for burnt-clay brick. The main source of energy for GSEBs is from the synthesis of the alkaline activators of NaOH and Na₂SiO₃ at energy values of 20.5 MJ/kg and 5.37 MJ/kg, respectively. These results indicate that using mine waste to produce GSEBs is an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional forms of masonry construction, especially in areas near the Kolar Gold Fields and thermal power stations.

Keywords

Geopolymer masonry, Gold mine tailings, Tank Bed Soil, Alkali activation, Fly Ash, Alccofine, Embodied energy.

References

1. 2019 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction, United Nations Environment Programme, pp. 1-41, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-status-report-for-buildings-and-construction-2019
2. Brick Kilns Performance Assessment: A Roadmap for Cleaner Brick Production in India. Climate and Clean Air Coalition, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.ccacoalition.org/resources/brick-kilns-performance-assessment-roadmap-cleaner-brick-production-india
3. Joseph Davidovits, “Properties of Geopolymer Cements,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev, Ukraine, pp. 131-149. 1994.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
4. John L. Provis, and Jannie S.J. van Deventer, Geopolymers: Structure, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 2009.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
5. P. Duxson et al., “Geopolymer Technology: The Current State of the Art and Future Research Needs,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2917-2933, 2007.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
6. Djwantoro Hardjito et al., “On the Development of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 467-472, 2004.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
7. John L. Provis, Angel Palomo, and Caijun Shi, “Advances in Understanding Alkali-Activated Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 78, pp. 110-125, 2015.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
8. Caijun Shi, Della Roy, and Pavel Krivenko, Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes, 1^st ed., Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, pp. 1-392, 2003.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
9. Chameera Udawattha, and Rangika Halwatura, “Life Cycle Cost of Different Walling Material Used for Affordable Housing in Tropics,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 7, pp. 15-29, 2017.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
10. T.K. Jyothi et al., “Studies on the Strength Development of Lime–Pozzolana Cement–Soil–Brick Powder based Geopolymer Composites,” Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 329-336, 2019.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
11. W. Pardavé et al., “Obtaining a Cementitious Geopolymer from Gold Mining Tailings with Possible Use in Engineering Applications,” American Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 137-143, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
12. K. Venugopal, Radhakrishna, and Vinod Sasalatti, “Development of Alkali Activated Geopolymer Masonry Blocks,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 149, pp. 1-12, 2016.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
13. R.K. Preethi, and B.V. Venkatarama Reddy, “Experimental Investigations on Geopolymer Stabilised Compressed Earth Products,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 257, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
14. Abhilash Holur Narayanaswamy et al., “Mechanical and Thermal Properties, and Comparative Life-Cycle Impacts, of Stabilised Earth Building Products,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 243, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
15. Jitha P T, Sunil Kumar B, and Raghunath S, “Strength Development and Masonry Properties of Geopolymer Stabilised Soil-LPC (Lime-Pozzolana Cement) Mixes,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 250, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
16. John L. Provis, Grant C. Lukey, and Jannie S. J. van Deventer, “Do Geopolymers Actually Contain Nanocrystalline Zeolites? A Reexamination of Existing Results,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3075-3085, 2005.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
17. B.V Venkatarama Reddy, and K.S Jagadish, “Embodied Energy of Common and Alternative Building Materials and Technologies,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 129-137, 2003.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
18. J. Davidovits, “Synthesis of New High-Temperature Geopolymers for Reinforced Plastics/Composites,” Proceedings of PACTEC ’79, Society of Plastics Engineers, Costa Mesa, California, USA, pp. 151-174, 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Nan Zhang et al., “Specimen Size Effects on the Mechanical Behaviors and Failure Patterns of the Mine Tailings-Based Geopolymer under Uniaxial Compression,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 281, 2021.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
20. K. Poorveekan et al., “Investigation of the Engineering Properties of Cementless Stabilized Earth Blocks with Alkali-Activated Eggshell and Rice Husk Ash as a Binder,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 277, 2021.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
21. H.K. Thejas, and Nabil Hossiney, “Compressed Unfired Blocks Made with Iron Ore Tailings and Slag,” Cogent Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
22. Shaker M.A. Qaidi et al., “Recycling of Mine Tailings for the Geopolymers Production: A Systematic Review,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 16, pp. 1-22, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
23. Gregorio Palma et al., “Optimization of Geopolymers for Sustainable Management of Mine Tailings: Impact on Mechanical, Microstructural, and Toxicological Properties,” Minerals, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1-22, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
24. Pozhhan Mokhtari et al., “Valorization of Mine Tailings for Sustainable Geopolymer Production,” International Journal of Ceramic Engineering & Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1-16, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
25. Jorge Fernandes et al., “Life Cycle Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Earthen Materials in the Portuguese Context: Rammed Earth and Compressed Earth Blocks,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 241, 2019.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]