Call for Paper - Upcoming Issues

Preliminary Fragility Assessment of a 19th-Century Baroque Church Bell Tower Using Multiple Time History Analyses

International Journal of Civil Engineering
© 2025 by SSRG - IJCE Journal
Volume 12 Issue 5
Year of Publication : 2025
Authors : Jeffrey DG. Clemente, Francis Aldrine Uy, Michael Bautista Baylon
10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I5P115
pdf
How to Cite?

Jeffrey DG. Clemente, Francis Aldrine Uy, Michael Bautista Baylon, "Preliminary Fragility Assessment of a 19th-Century Baroque Church Bell Tower Using Multiple Time History Analyses," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 12,  no. 5, pp. 197-209, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I5P115

Abstract:

Philippine structures frequently experience seismic activity, yet the effects of high-intensity earthquakes are often assessed only after they occur. The inadequacy of extensive research on this area, especially for the investigation of structures that were built before systematic building and structural codes were established, poses a problem, especially in heritage preservation and protection. This study aims to develop fragility curves as a preliminary assessment of the seismic vulnerability of the bell tower of Pulilan, Bulacan’s Diocesan Shrine and Parish of San Isidro Labrador through Linear Time History Analysis (LTHA), considering limited inelastic data for adobe masonry and destructive testing on the structure. The material properties of tested concrete and adobe samples were integrated into a 3D structural model in Midas Gen to assess the tower’s seismic response to scaled 11 ground motion records. The fragility curves from the preliminary assessment show that the bell tower is prone to minor damage to weak PGAs. Considering the required basic design PGA of 0.4g in the Philippines, structural compromise is anticipated, having surpassed the 50% probability threshold at the Life Safety (LS) limit. The findings can serve as a reference for future nonlinear analyses and for the implementation of appropriate retrofitting measures on the tower.

Keywords:

Adobe masonry, Fragility curves, Heritage conservation, Linear Time History Analysis, Seismic vulnerability.

References:

[1] Jeffrey S. Perez et al., “Impacts and Causative Fault of the 2022 Magnitude (Mw) 7.0 Northwestern Luzon Earthquake, Philippines,” Frontiers in Earth Science, vol. 11, pp. 1-15, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] “Situational Report for Magnitude 7.0 Earthquake in Tayum, Abra,” National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC), 2022.
[Publisher Link]
[3] “Final Report Effects of Magnitude 7.2 Sagbayan, Bohol Earthquake, National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC), pp. 1-42, 2013.
[Publisher Link]
[4] Pia Ranada, Cultural Agencies to Restore Damaged Heritage Structures, Rappler, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.rappler.com/philippines/41417-national-historical-commission-statement/
[5] Henremagne C. Peñarubia, Probabilistic Seismic Ground Motion Hazard Analysis: A Tool for Disaster Risk Management, Seminar on Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Risk Management, pp. 1-23, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.rsucivilengineering.weebly.com/uploads/7/7/6/4/77644974/psgmha_atool4disasterriskmitigation_081919_4rsu.pdf
[6] Luca Lombardi, Flavia De Luca, and John Macdonald, “Design of Buildings through Linear Time-History Analysis Optimising Ground Motion Selection: A Case Study for RC-MRFs,” Engineering Structures, vol. 192, pp. 279-295, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Alessia Di Cuia et al., “Linear Time-History Analysis for EC8 Design of CBF Structures,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 199, pp. 3522-3527, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] P. Mortazavi, J. Stephenson, and J. Elliot, “The Benefits of Linear Time-History Analysis in Consulting Practice and the Precision of the Code Calculated Period,” 6th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017, National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering, 2017.
[Google Scholar]
[9] Luca Lombardi, and Flavia De Luca, “Derivation of Fragility Curves at Design Stage through Linear Time-History Analysis,” Engineering Structures, vol. 219, pp. 1-28, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Hasan Dilek, and Ali Sadeghpour, “A Comparison of Different Linear and Non-linear Structural Analysis Methods,” ENG Transactions, vol. 3, pp. 1-9, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Fadzli Mohamed Nazri, Seismic Fragility Assessment for Buildings due to Earthquake Excitation, Springer Singapore, pp. 1-114, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Jhon Philip Camayang, Orlean Dela Cruz, and Rhommel Grutas, “Integrating Building- and Site-Specific and Generic Fragility Curves into Seismic Risk Assessment: A PRISMA-Based Analysis of Methodologies and Applications,” CivilEng, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1011-1041, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] D.D’Ayala et al., “Multi–hazard Risk Assessment of Priority Cultural Heritage Structures in the Philippines,” 6th Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (6ACEE), Cebu City, Philippines, pp. 1-13, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Samia Hannachi, and M. Nacer Guetteche, “Review of the Rebound Hammer Method Estimating Concrete Compressive Strength on Site,” Proceedings of International Conference on Architecture And Civil Engineering, Dubai, pp. 118-127, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Dora Silveira et al., “Mechanical Properties of Adobe Bricks in Ancient Constructions,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 36-44, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Dora Silveira, Humberto Varum, and Aníbal Costa, “Influence of the Testing Procedures in the Mechanical Characterization of Adobe Bricks,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 40, pp. 719-728, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Qiang Xue et al., “The Draft Code for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Buildings in Taiwan,” Engineering Structures, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1535-1547, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Yasser E. Ibrahim, and Mostafa M. El-Shami, “Seismic Fragility Curves for Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Frames in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 213-223, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP), National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th ed., Quezon City, Philippines, 2016.
[Publisher Link]
[20] Shan Wu, “Statistical Analysis on Concrete Strength,” Modern Civil and Structural Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 63-71, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Mohd. Zameeruddin Mohd. Saleemuddin, and Keshav K. Sangle “Seismic Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structure using Non-Linear Static Analyses,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 21, pp. 1319-1330, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Yishuo Huang et al., “Reinforced Concrete Beams Retrofitted with UHPC or CFRP,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 17, pp. 1-11, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Mohamadreza Delzendeh Moghadam, Abbas Fathi, and Omar Chaallal, “Retrofitting of Steel Structures with CFRP: Literature Review and Research Needs,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 1-20, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Giorgia Cianchino et al., “An Overview of the Historical Retrofitting Interventions on Churches in Central Italy,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-32, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Emrah Meral, Bayram Tanik Cayci, and Mehmet Inel, “Comparative Study on the Linear and Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Typical RC Buildings,” Construction Magazine, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 587-607, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Ahmet Demir, Ali Haydar Kayhan, and Mehmet Palanci, “Response- and Probability-Based Evaluation of Spectrally Matched Ground Motion Selection Strategies for Bi-Directional Dynamic Analysis of Low- to Mid-Rise RC Buildings,” Structures, vol. 58, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Sergio Lagomarsino, and Serena Cattari, “PERPETUATE Guidelines for Seismic Performance-Based Assessment of Cultural Heritage Masonry Structures,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 13-47, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Marco Valente, “Earthquake Response and Damage Patterns Assessment of Two Historical Masonry Churches with Bell Tower,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 151, pp. 1-23, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Marco Valente, “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Earthquake Response of Slender Historical Masonry Bell Towers in South-East Lombardia,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 129, 1-29, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Patryk Kot et al., “Recent Advancements in Non-Destructive Testing Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1-28, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Nuria Chiara Palazzi et al., “Preliminary Assessment on Seismic Vulnerability of Masonry Churches in Central Chile,” International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 829-848, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] H.C. Penarubia et al., “Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Model for the Philippines,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 44-68, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]