Comparative Performance of H-Sections and Symmetrical Cruciform Columns Under Axial Compression

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2025 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 12 Issue 8

Year of Publication : 2025

Authors : Riza Suwondo, Militia Keintjem

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I8P115

How to Cite?

Riza Suwondo, Militia Keintjem, "Comparative Performance of H-Sections and Symmetrical Cruciform Columns Under Axial Compression," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 12,  no. 8, pp. 168-175, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I8P115

Abstract:

Axially loaded steel columns are fundamental elements for a wide range of structural applications, and their performance is often governed by flexural buckling under increasing slenderness. Conventional column designs typically rely on hot-rolled H-sections that are susceptible to weak-axis instability, particularly in tall or slender configurations. Built-up cruciform sections, such as King and Queen cross-sections, have been proposed as alternatives offering improved geometric balance and enhanced buckling resistance. However, a systematic comparison of their axial performances relative to standard H-sections, particularly on an equivalent weight basis, remains limited. This study aims to address this gap by conducting a detailed comparative analysis of the design axial load-carrying capacities of representative H-sections (H150, H200, and H300) and their equivalently weighted King (K198, K248, and K350) and Queen (Q200, Q298, and Q400) cruciform counterparts. The analysis was performed in accordance with the AISC 360-16 provisions, considering pinned-pinned boundary conditions and column lengths ranging from 3 m to 10 m to capture varying slenderness effects. The results demonstrate that while King cruciform sections perform well in short, stocky columns, their efficiency diminishes at higher slenderness. In contrast, the Queen cruciform sections consistently outperformed both the King and conventional H-sections in both strong-axis and weak-axis buckling across all lengths, particularly in slender columns. These findings offer valuable design insights for optimising the column selection in applications where global stability and material efficiency are critical.

Keywords:

Steel columns, Cruciform sections, Axial capacity, Buckling behaviour, Structural efficiency.

References:

[1] Yi Zhou et al., “Design Methods of High Strength Steel Welded H-Sections Under Compression Accounting for Local–Global Buckling,” Structures, vol. 56, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Jie Wang et al., “Interactive Buckling Behaviour of Q420–Q960 Steel Welded Thin-Walled H-Section Long Column,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 203, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Zhongqi Chen et al., “Local Buckling and Hysteretic Behavior of Thin-Walled Q690 High-Strength Steel H-Section Beam-Columns Engineering Structures, vol. 252, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Yue Yuan et al., “A New H-Section Buckling-Restrained Brace Improved by Movable Steel Blocks and Stiffening Ribs,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 45, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Voraphol Horsangchai, Akhrawat Lenwari, and Ben Young, “Elastic and Inelastic Major-Axis Flexural Buckling of Cellular Steel Columns,” Engineering Structures, vol. 301, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Pattamad Panedpojaman, Thaksin Thepchatri, and Suchart Limkatanyu, “Elastic Buckling of Cellular Columns under Axial Compression,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 145, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Erling A. Smith, “Buckling of Four Equal‐Leg Angle Cruciform Columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 439-450, 1983.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Xitong Dong et al., “Seismic Behaviour of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Column to H-Shape Steel Beam Connection with Side Plate,” Structures, vol. 50, pp. 1608-1624, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Asal Pournaghshband, and Roham Maher, “Numerical Investigation of Cyclic Behaviour in H-Shaped Stainless-Steel Beam-Columns,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 227, pp. 1-15, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Weining Sui, Zhanfei Wang, and Xiaomin Li, “Experimental Performance of Irregular PZs in CHS Column H-Shape Beam Steel Frame,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 158, pp. 547-559, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Chenglong Wu et al., “Development and Testing of Hybrid Precast Steel-Reinforced Concrete Column-to-H Shape Steel Beam Connections under Cyclic Loading,” Engineering Structures, vol. 211, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Min Xia et al., “Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Corroded Q345 H-Shaped Steel Column under Axial Compression Load,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 52, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Abazar Asghari, and Aydin Pavir, “Evaluation of the Shear Strength of Flanged Cruciform Steel Columns in the Panel Zone of Moment-Resisting Frames,” Structures, vol. 73, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Behnam Behzadi-Sofiani, Leroy Gardner, and M. Ahmer Wadee, “Behaviour, Finite Element Modelling and Design of Cruciform Section Steel Columns,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 182, pp. 1-25, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] P. Arun Kumar, and B. Anupriya, “Performance Assessment of Cruciform Steel Column: FEM Simulation,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 64, pp. 1043-1047, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Gang Shi et al., “Experimental Study on Cruciform Welded Connections with Thick Steel Plates in Moment-Resisting Beam-to-Column Joints,” Engineering Structures, vol. 331, pp. 1-36, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Ruikai Dai et al., “Behaviour, Finite Element Modelling and Design of Flanged Cruciform Section Steel Columns,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 204, pp. 1-20, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Nicholas Harris, and Girum Urgessa, “Strength of Flanged and Plain Cruciform Members,” Advance in Civil Engineering, vol. 2018, pp. 1-7, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Mohammad Motallebi Nasrabadi, Shahabeddin Torabian, and Seyed Rasoul Mirghaderi, “Panel Zone Modelling of Flanged Cruciform Columns: An analytical and Numerical Approach,” Engineering Structures, vol. 49, pp. 491-507, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Abazar Asghari, and Aydin Pavir, “Evaluation of the Shear Strength of Flanged Cruciform Steel Columns in the Panel Zone of Moment-Resisting Frames,” Structures, vol. 73, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] A.L. Zhzng et al., “Experimental Research on Steel Specially Shaped Columns with Cruciform Section under Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Building Structures, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 11-19, 2010.
[Google Scholar] 
[22] Hamed Saffari, Sina Sarfarazi, and Ali Fakhraddini, “A Mathematical Steel Panel Zone Model for Flanged Cruciform Columns,” Steel and Composite Structures, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 851-67, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16) – 2016,” American Institute of Steel Construction, pp. 1-680, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]