Evaluating the Effectiveness of Shear Keys on Stability and Design Efficiency of Cantilever Retaining Walls

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2025 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 12 Issue 8

Year of Publication : 2025

Authors : Riza Suwondo, Militia Keintjem, Aksan Kawanda, Mohammed Altaee

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I8P117

How to Cite?

Riza Suwondo, Militia Keintjem, Aksan Kawanda, Mohammed Altaee, "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Shear Keys on Stability and Design Efficiency of Cantilever Retaining Walls," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 12,  no. 8, pp. 184-190, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I8P117

Abstract:

Retaining walls are critical geotechnical structures designed to resist lateral earth pressures, with sliding and overturning identified as primary failure modes. Although shear keys are commonly used to enhance sliding resistance, limited quantitative research has compared stability performance and design efficiency across varying wall heights. This study investigated the effect of shear keys on the stability and material use of cantilever retaining walls subjected to static lateral earth pressures by evaluating walls with and without shear keys at different heights. Stability analyses were conducted using Rankine’s active earth pressure theory, followed by iterative optimization of the wall base dimensions to achieve a target safety of 1.5 for both sliding and overturning. The results demonstrate that shear keys significantly improve sliding stability and reduce the required base width, especially at lower wall heights. However, their effectiveness diminishes as the wall height increases, and sliding governs the design at higher heights. Additionally, the presence of a shear key yields only marginal reductions in concrete volume, indicating limited material savings. These findings provide practical insights for engineers in selecting and optimizing key shear designs, highlighting that their primary benefit lies in stability enhancement rather than material efficiency.

Keywords:

Cantilever retaining wall, Shear Key, Sliding stability, Overturning stability, Design optimization.

References:

[1] Bingdong Ding et al., “Optimizing Shape Design in Drystone Retaining Walls: A Multi-Scope Approach Focusing on Failure Mechanisms,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 489, pp. 1-27, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Amir H. Gandomi, and Ali R. Kashani, “Automating Pseudo-Static Analysis of Concrete Cantilever Retaining Wall Using Evolutionary Algorithms,” Measurement, vol. 115, pp. 104-124, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Prajakta R. Jadhav, and Amit Prashant, “Computation of Seismic Translational and Rotational Displacements of Cantilever Retaining Wall with Shear Key,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 130, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] G. Candia, and N. Sitar, “Seismic Earth Pressures on Retaining Structures with Cohesive Backfills,” State of California Department of Transportation, Technical Report, pp. 1-171, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Gogot Setyo Budi et al., “Optimization of Counterfort Retaining Wall Structure with Shear Key using Metaheuristic Method,” Civil Engineering Dimension, vol. 26, pp. 151-159, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Nisha Sarath, R. Shivashankar, and A.U. Ravi Shankar, “Role of Shear Keys in Cantilever Retaining Wall,” Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference, Kochi, pp. 627-630, 2011.
[Google Scholar]
[7] Majid Ebad Sichani, and Khosro Bargi “Seismic Behavior of Concrete Retaining Wall with Shear Key, Considering Soil-Structure Interaction,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1-6, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Gowshikan Arulananthan, and Nalin de Silva, “Effect of a Shear Key on the Behaviour and Stability of Cantilever Type Retaining Walls,” Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka, pp. 1-5, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, “LRFD Seismic Analysis and Design of Transportation Geotechnical Features and Structural Foundations,” pp. 1-588, 2011.
[Publisher Link]
[10] Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, “Seismic Design Criteria Version 2.0 Caltrans: Sacramento,” CA, USA, pp. 1-250, 2019.
[Publisher Link]
[11] NAVFAC Design Manual 7.2: Foundations and Earth Structures, Technical Report, Washington, DC, 1982.
[Publisher Link]
[12] Elif Nur Kalemci et al., “Design of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Retaining Wall Using Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm,” Structures, vol. 23, pp. 245-253, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Hasan Tahsin Öztürk, Tayfun Dede, and Emel Türker, “Optimum Design of Reinforced Concrete Counterfort Retaining Walls Using TLBO, Jaya Algorithm,” Structures, vol. 25, pp. 285-296, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] William John Macquorn Rankine, “On the Stability of Loose Earth,” Philosophical Transactions Royal Society, vol. 147, pp. 9-27, 1857.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]