Symbolic Meaning of Cultural Space in Nggela Indigenous Settlement: A Case Study from Flores Island, Indonesia

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2025 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 12 Issue 8

Year of Publication : 2025

Authors : Mukhlis A. Mukhtar, Antariksa, Lisa Dwi Wulandari

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I8P122

How to Cite?

Mukhlis A. Mukhtar, Antariksa, Lisa Dwi Wulandari, "Symbolic Meaning of Cultural Space in Nggela Indigenous Settlement: A Case Study from Flores Island, Indonesia," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 12,  no. 8, pp. 238-251, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I8P122

Abstract:

Cultural space refers to the entirety of cultural values and their concretization, encompassing user activities and the physical forms of settlements and architecture. This study aims to uncover the meaning of cultural space in the oldest indigenous settlement in Flores, East Nusa Tenggara: the Nggela indigenous settlement of the Lio ethnic group. This qualitative-inductive research began with data collection through field observation, interviews, and visual documentation. Analysis was conducted through in-depth description to identify the spatial elements and activities within the settlement and the traditional house (Sa’o Nggua). Based on this description, the underlying meanings of cultural space were interpreted. Findings show that the ceremonial activities are primarily centered on the center of customary settlement (Puse Nua), a sacred courtyard located at the heart of the village that serves as the ritual center (Kanga), and traditional houses (Sa’o Nggua). These elements serve as a medium through which elders communicate with the Creator, the ancestors, and nature. The meaning of this triadic connection, human, divine, and natural world, is what compels the community to preserve the spatial configuration and its embedded values, despite the physical degradation or material transformations due to time and natural disasters.

Keywords:

Ceremonial activities, Culture, Lio ethnic group, Meaning, Traditional architecture.

References:

[1] Reginaldo Christophori Lakes, “Culture of Tectonic Wologai Ende, East Nusa Tenggara an Art of Constructing Traditional Houses of Central Wologai Village, Detusoko District, Wawo - Ata Lio Ancestral Heritage at the Foot of Mount Lepembusus,” Arsitektur Dan Air, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 151-166, 2015.
[Google Scholar]
[2] Reginaldo Christophori Lakess, Wologai, Vernacular Exoticism at the Foot of Mount Lepembusus, Kupang: Song of Loves, 2015.
[Google Scholar]
[3] Petrus Vincentius Parera, and Yohanes Djarot Purbadi, “Nature, Human and Local Beliefs as Inspirations for the Forms, Functions, and Meanings of Several Symbols on Traditional Houses in Gurusina Adat Village, Ngada Regency,” ARTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 465-478, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 
[4] Aron Meko Mbete, Lio-Ende Cultural Treasures: Department of Education and Culture, Ende Regency, pp. 1-220, 2006.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] “Ende Regency in Figuress,” Central Statistics Agency of Ende Regency, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Laura Daglio, Elisabetta Ginelli, and Giulia Vignati, “Housing Design: Furniture or Fixtures? Accommodating Change through Technological and Typological Innovation,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 7, spp. 1-24, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Paul Ricoeur, Universal Civilization and National Cultures, History and Truth, Northwestern University Press, 1965.
[Google Scholar]
[8] Liane Lefaivre, and Alexander Tzonis, Critical Regionalism : Architecture and Identity in a Globalized World, Prestel Publishing, pp. 1-159, 2003.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Vincent B. Canizaro, Critical Regionalism: From Critical Theory to Postcolonial and Local Awareness, The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Architectural History, 1st ed., pp. 1-15, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] F.T.A. Kerong, “Zoning of Traditional Settlement in Nggela Village, Wolojita District, Ende Regencyss,” Teknosiar, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 42-52, 2015.
[Google Scholar]
[11] Maria Alfionita Paru, I. Sasongko, and A.H. Imaduddina, “Spatial Organization Pattern of SettlementsiIn Nggela Traditional Village, Wolojita District, Ende Regency,” Thesis, Urban and Regional Planning Engineering (PWK), pp. 1-7, 2018.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Furqon Badriantoro, “Kema Sa'o Nggua Nua Nggela Recording the Construction Process of the Traditional House of Nggela Village, Ende, East Nusa Tenggara,” Indonesian Architecture Seminar & Exhibitions, pp. 17-28, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Koentjaraningrat, People and Culture in Indonesia, Jakarta: Djambatan, 1990.
[Google Scholar]  [Publisher Link]
[14] Koentjaraningrat, Introduction to Anthropology, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Marvin Harris, Culture, People, Nature: An Introduction to General Anthropology, Harpercollins College Publishers, pp. 1-551, 1993.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Kusnaka Adimihardja, Architecture in a Cultural Frameworks, Outside Pub, pp. 1-73, 2004.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Mudji Sutrisno, and Hendar Putranto, Cultural Theories, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2005.
[Google Scholar]
[18] Paul Oliver, Encyclopedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Christian Norberg-Schulz, Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture, Academy Editions, pp. 1-213, 1980.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Amos Rapoport, House, Form, and Culture, Prentice Hall, pp. 1-146, 1969.
[Publisher Link]
[21] Amos Rapoport, “Theory, Culture and Housing,” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 145-165, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Amos Rapoport, Culture, Architecture, and Design, Locke Science Publishing, pp. 1-137, 2005.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Amos Rapoport, The Use and Design of Open Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods, Quality of Urban Life: Social, Psychological, and Physical Conditions, spp. 159-176, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Amos Rapoport, “Development, Culture Change and Supportive Design,” Habitat International, vol. 7, no. 5-6, pp. 249-268, 1983.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Kapila D. Silva, and Nisha A. Fernando, Theorizing Built Form and Culture: The Legacy of Amos Rapoport, 1st ed., Taylor & Francis, pp. 1-332, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] P. Salura, and B. Fauzi, “The Ever-Rotating Aspects of Function-Form-Meaning in Architecture,” Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 7086-7090, 2012.
[Google Scholar]
[27] Purnama Salura, Foolish Architectures, CSS Pub, pp. 1-191, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Purnama Salura, Stephanie Clarissas, “Formulating Architectural Ethnosemantics as a New Research Method,” ARTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 477-490, 2025.
[CrossRef]  [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] John W. Creswell, and Cheryl N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, SAGE Publications, pp. 1-488, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Setha Low, Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place, Taylor & Francis, 1st ed., pp. 1-276, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]