Composite Green Rating System for Enhancing Rural Area with Infrastructure, Environmental, and Sustainable Development Predicting Risk Analysis

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2026 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 13 Issue 1

Year of Publication : 2026

Authors : Merlin Revathy S, Kumar S S

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I1P102

How to Cite?

Merlin Revathy S, Kumar S S, "Composite Green Rating System for Enhancing Rural Area with Infrastructure, Environmental, and Sustainable Development Predicting Risk Analysis," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13,  no. 1, pp. 207-240, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I1P102

Abstract:

Rural development requires interaction among many social, economic, and environmental factors along a growth trajectory significantly different from that which occurs in cities. In fact, rural territories very often present some critical limitations, such as scarce services, scattered distribution of resources, and greater vulnerability to environmental changes. With this in mind, sustainable development strategies must balance necessary infrastructure support with responsible resource management. The present study aims to proffer a CGRS that can be employed for the assessment and comparison of the sustainability of rural settlements using a set of structured and clearly definable environmental, infrastructural, and socio-economic indicators. The framework integrates sustainability evaluation with elements of risk assessment, with particular attention to the role of renewable energy use in village-level development. Field surveys were conducted in three villages of Sangli district, Maharashtra, representing diverse ecological and developmental conditions: Padmale (riverine), Bilashi (hilly), and Dorli (arid). The results showed that Bilashi had the highest score for CGRS, 2.69, closely followed by Padmale, 2.68, indicating only moderate variations in the sustainability performance of these villages. Dorli scored comparatively lower, 2.64, mainly because of its poor water-quality management and limited adoption of renewable sources of energy. The research derives policy recommendations for regional development planning from decentralized energy generation, green infrastructure, and sustainable community projects to close this knowledge gap and enhance rural environmental resilience. The CGRS framework introduces a scalable, data-driven policy planning framework for policy planners to quantify rural sustainability performance, as well as guide interventions for development.

Keywords:

Composite green rating system, Eco-integrity, Environmental analysis, Infrastructure development, Risk analysis, Rural development, Sustainable development.

References:

[1] Iris C. Bohnet et al., “Co-Creating Cultural Narratives for Sustainable Rural Development: A Transdisciplinary Learning Framework for Guiding Place-based Social-Ecological Research,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainabilit, vol. 73, pp. 1-13, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Sudipta Mandal, and S. Santhosh Kumar, “Impact of Green Building Certifications on Sustainable Practices in Construction Supply Chains in India,” JNNCE Journal of Engineering and Managemen, Special Edition 4th ed., pp. 400-417, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Santosh Gore et al., “Exploring the Path to Sustainable Growth with Augmented Intelligence by Integrating CSR into Economic Models,” 2023 Second International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS), Trichy, India, pp. 265-271, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] David W. South, and Savas Alpay, “Analyzing Global Progress on United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 13-Clean Energy and Climate Action,” Climate and Energy, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 23-32, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Mahmoud Alsharkawy, Ahmed Hamdy, and Mohamed Marzouk, “Developing a new Sustainable Rating System for Assessing Construction Projects using BWM,” Cleaner Engineering and Technology, vol. 25, pp. 1-10, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Tieli Wang, Dingliang Wang, and Zhiwei Zeng, “Research on the Construction and Measurement of Digital Governance Level System of County Rural Areas in China-Empirical Analysis based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1-23, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Hong Ye et al., “A Study on the Correlation Between Urbanization and Agricultural Economy based on Efficiency Measurement and Quantile Regression: Evidence from China,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 1-32, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Meinan Chen, and Ruiying Shen, “Rural Settlement Development in Western China: Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-20, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Ernest Baba Ali, Valery Pavlovich Anufriev, and Bismark Amfo, “Green Economy Implementation in Ghana as a Road Map for a Sustainable Development Drive: A Review,” Scientific African, vol. 12, pp. 1-17, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Paolo Gerli, Julio Navio Marco, and Jason Whalley, “What Makes a Smart Village Smart? A Review of the Literature,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 292-304, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Hemraj R. Kumavat, Rohan V. Kumavat, and Hemal V. Bhangale, “Proposed Framework for Sustainable Village Strategy in the Semi-Arid Region of Maharashtra, India,” Latest Trends in Renewable Energy Technologies: Select Proceedings of NCRESE 2020, vol. 760, pp. 161-171, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Bushra Sabir et al., “Smart Villages: Application of Internet-of-Things in the Development of Rural India,” Innovations in Cyber Physical Systems: Select Proceedings of ICICPS 2020, vol. 788, pp. 147-155, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Priyanka Kochhar et al., “Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment-A Green-Building Rating System for Catalysing Climate-Change Mitigation/Adaptation in India,” F1000Research, vol. 11, pp. 1-29, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Allison L. Ricket et al., “Rural Sustainable Prosperity: Social Enterprise Ecosystems as a Framework for Sustainable Rural Development,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 1-18, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Emmanuel Der Tambile et al., “Rural Livelihoods Sustainability in South Asia and Africa: A Systematic Review with Bibliometric Analysis,” Discover Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Ashok Sengupta, “Sustainable Development in India with Reference to Agricultural Sector,” SSRN, pp. 1-11, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Carlos Cuenca-Enrique et al., “Sustainability of Rural Electrification Projects in Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 23, pp. 1-17, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Suresh Renukappa et al., “Evaluation of Smart Village Strategies and Challenges,” Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1386-1407, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Om Raj Katoch et al., “Promoting Sustainability: Tackling Energy Poverty with Solar Power as a Renewable Energy Solution in the Indian Energy Landscape,” Discover Energy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Snigdha Sarita Mohapatra et al., “Integrated Urban Water Management Modeling Under Future Water Demand and Climate Scenarios for the City of Bangalore, India,” EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Mimin Sundari Nasution et al., “Bibliometric Analysis of Rural Economic Development: Convergence Between Sustainable Agriculture, Digital Technology, and Community Engagement for Village Self-Reliance,” International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 245-262, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Hammad Shahab et al., “Iot-based Agriculture Management Techniques for Sustainable Farming: A Comprehensive Review,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 220, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Sambandh Bhusan Dhal, and Debashish Kar, “Transforming Agricultural Productivity with AI-Driven Forecasting: Innovations in Food Security and Supply Chain Optimization,” Forecasting, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 925-951, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Ganga Devi, Nayana Raj, and Subhajeet Kar, “Environmental Sustainability through Green Economy in Context to Indian Scenario: A Review,” Medicon Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 16-27, 2025.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Sanju John Thomas et al., “Indian Rural Livelihoods and Renewable Energy Interventions - A Critical Analysis for a Bottom-up Approach for Sustainability from an Energy-Water-Food Nexus Context,” Energy Nexus, vol. 18, pp. 1-7, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] S. Krishnendu et al., “Towards Grassroots Sustainable Development using Human Centered Design and Participatory Rural Appraisal: A Study in Two Rural Indian Villages,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 9, pp. 1-14, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Deyong Zhang, and Tian Tian, “Construction of Green Villages/Townships Evaluation Model for Economic Metropolitan Circle,” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 21, no. 75, pp. 130-156, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Niloofar Abed et al., “Assessing Farm-Level Agricultural Sustainability in India: A Comparative Study using a Mixed-Method Approach,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 224, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]