From Waste to Resilience: A State-of-the-Art Review on Fly Ash-Based Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2026 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 13 Issue 1

Year of Publication : 2026

Authors : Majula Karmakar, Hasim Ali Khan, T. Senthil Vadivel, Sayandip Ganguly

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I1P108

How to Cite?

Majula Karmakar, Hasim Ali Khan, T. Senthil Vadivel, Sayandip Ganguly, "From Waste to Resilience: A State-of-the-Art Review on Fly Ash-Based Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13,  no. 1, pp. 93-103, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I1P108

Abstract:

The construction sector remains heavily dependent on Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and natural aggregates worldwide, making it one of the largest contributors to carbon emissions and resource depletion. At the same time, industries still have challenges in properly disposing of fly ash and tires with a minimum useful life, both of which are produced in enormous quantities annually. Fly Ash-Based Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete (FRGC) presents a suitable alternative to replace cement, natural aggregates used in conventional concrete, and reduce carbon footprint by utilizing waste products. A geopolymer binder made from low-calcium fly ash is used in place of OPC in FRGC, and rubber fragments recovered from used tires are used in place of some of the natural aggregates. An extensive review is therefore performed in this study to highlight the research gaps to be addressed in the future and potential challenges in achieving the goal. The present study also examines the effects of rubber size/content, curing regime, silicate-to-hydroxide ratio, and alkaline activator molarity on the mechanical, fresh, and durability characteristics of FRGC. Results from previous studies show that adding rubber by 6% can lower compressive strength by 10–25%. However, it significantly improves ductility, impact resistance, and energy absorption by more than 50%. However, the geopolymer binder lowers the carbon footprint of concrete by 60–80% as compared to OPC and offers great early strength and exceptional durability in harsh settings. This consolidated literature reveals that while the alkaline chemistry of geopolymer binders and the toughness benefits of rubber are individually well studied, their combined influence under elevated curing and fire exposure remains critically underexplored. Furthermore, long-term durability and corrosion studies of FRGC are scarce, and no comprehensive datasets exist for machine learning-based prediction. Addressing these gaps will define the trajectory for future research and standardization.

Keywords:

Geopolymer Concrete, Rubberized Concrete, Fly Ash, Sustainable Construction, Lifecycle Assessment.

References:

[1] Karen L. Scrivener et al., “Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 114, pp. 2-26, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Emad Benhelal et al., “Global Strategies and Potentials to Curb CO2 Emissions in Cement Industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 51, pp. 142-161, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] USGS, Cement Statistics and Information, U.S. Geological Survey, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/national-minerals-information-center/cement-statistics-and-information
[4] Rafat Siddique, and Tarun R. Naik, “Properties of Concrete Containing Scrap-Tire Rubber- An Overview,” Waste Management, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 563-569, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Blessen Skariah Thomas, and Ramesh Chandra Gupta, “A Comprehensive Review on the Applications of Waste Tire Rubber in Cement Concrete,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 54, pp. 1323-1333, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] [6] J. Davidovits, “Geopolymers: Inorganic Polymeric New Materials,” Journal of Thermal Analysis, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1633-1656, 1991.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] J. Davidovits, “Chemistry of Geopolymeric Systems, Terminology,” International Conference on Geopolymers, pp. 9-40, 1999.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] A. Palomo, M.W. Grutzeck, and M.T. Blanco, “Alkali-Activated Fly Ashes: A Cement for the Future,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1323-1329, 1999.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Benjamin C. McLellan et al., “Costs and Carbon Emissions for Geopolymer Pastes in Comparison to Ordinary Portland Cement,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 19, no. 9-10, pp. 1080-1090, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Louise K. Turner, and Frank G. Collins, “Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (Co2-e) Emissions: A Comparison between Geopolymer and OPC Cement Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 43, pp. 125-130, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Neil N. Eldin, and Ahmed B. Senouci, “Rubber-Type Particles as Concrete Aggregate,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 478-496, 1993.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Ilker Bekir Topçu, “The Properties of Rubberized Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 304-310, 1995.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] DG Goulias, and A-H Ali, “Evaluation of Rubber-Filled Concrete and Correlation between Destructive and Non-Destructive Testing Results,” Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 140-144, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Guoqiang Li et al., “Development of Waste Tire Modified Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2283-2289, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Samar Raffoul et al., “Behaviour of Unconfined and FRP-confined Rubberised Concrete in Axial Compression,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 147, 388-397, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] A. Fernández-Jiménez, and A. Palomo, “Characterization of Fly Ashes: Potential Reactivity as Alkaline Cements,” Fuel, vol. 82, no. 18, pp. 2259-2265, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Djwantoro Hardjito et al., “On the Development of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 467-472, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Hua Xu, and Jannie S.J. Van Deventer, “The Geopolymerisation of Alumino-Silicate Minerals,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 247-266, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] P. Chindaprasirt, T. Chareerat, and V. Sirivivatnanon, “Workability and Strength of Coarse High Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 224-229, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Pradip Nath, and Prabir Kumar Sarker, “Effect of GGBFS on Setting, Workability and Early Strength Properties of Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete Cured in Ambient Condition,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 66, pp. 163-171, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Valeria F.F Barbosa, Kenneth J.D MacKenzie, and Clelio Thaumaturgo, “Synthesis and Characterisation of Materials based on Inorganic Polymers of Alumina and Silica: Sodium Polysialate Polymers,” International Journal of Inorganic Materials, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 309-317, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] J.C. Swanepoel, and C.A. Strydom, “Utilisation of Fly Ash in a Geopolymeric Material,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1143-1148, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] B.V. Rangan, “Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” International Workshop on Geopolymer Cement and Concrete, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] N.A Lloyd, and B.V Rangan, “Geopolymer Concrete: A Review of Development and Opportunities,” 35th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures, Singapore, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Terry Gourley, “Geopolymers: Opportunities for Environmentally Friendly Construction Materials,” Conference on Adaptive materials for a modern society, Sydney, 2003.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Zaher K. Khatib, and Fouad M. Bayomy, “Rubberized Portland Cement Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 206-213, 1999.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] N. Segre, and I. Joekes, “Use of Tire Rubber Particles as Addition to Cement Paste,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1421-1425, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Obinna Onuaguluchi, and Daman K. Panesar, “Hardened Properties of Concrete Mixtures Containing Pre-Coated Crumb Rubber and Silica Fume,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 82, pp. 125-131, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Osama Youssf, Reza Hassanli, and Julie E. Mills, “Mechanical Performance of FRP-Confined and Unconfined Crumb Rubber Concrete Containing High Rubber Content,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 115-126, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Yajish Giri A/L Parama Giri et al., “Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete: Modeling and Optimization,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1-20, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] IS: 383. (1970). Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, 2nd revision, 1970.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Behzad Nematollahi, and Jay Sanjayan, “Effect of Different Superplasticizers and Activator Combinations on Workability and Strength of Fly Ash based Geopolymer,” Materials and Design, vol. 57, pp. 667-672, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] P. Duxson et al., “Geopolymer Technology: The Current State of the Art,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2917-2933, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] T.W. Cheng, and J.P. Chiu, “Fire-Resistant Geopolymer Produced by Granulated Blast Furnace Slag,” Minerals Engineering, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 205-210, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] I.B. Topçu, and N. Avcular, “Collision Behaviours of Rubberized Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1893-1898, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Alireza Kashani et al., “The Interrelationship between Surface Chemistry and Rheology in Alkali Activated Slag Paste,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 65, pp. 583-591, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Amin Noushini et al., “Mechanical and Flexural Performance of Synthetic Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 186, pp. 454-475, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] A. Turatsinze, S. Bonnet, and J.-L. Granju, Mechanical Characterisation of Cement-Based Mortar Incorporating Rubber Aggregates from Recycled Worn Tyres,” Building and Environment, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 221-226, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] ACI Committee 544, “Measurement of Properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (ACI 544.2R-89),” American Concrete Institute, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]"
[40] Ali O. Atahan, and Ayhan Öner Yücel, “Crumb Rubber in Concrete: Static and Dynamic Evaluation,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 36, pp. 617-622, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] F. Hernández-Olivares et al., Static and Dynamic Behaviour of Recycled Tyre Rubber-Filled Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1587-1596, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Osama Youssf et al., “An Experimental Investigation of Crumb Rubber Concrete Confined by Fibre Reinforced Polymer Tubes,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 53, pp. 522-532, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Jianhe Xie et al., “Physicochemical Properties of Alkali Activated GGBS and Fly Ash Geopolymeric Recycled Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 204, pp. 384-398, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] T. Bakharev, “Durability of Geopolymer Materials in Sodium and Magnesium Sulfate Solutions,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1233-1246, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] Allahverdi Ali, and Škvára František, “Sulfuric Acid Attack on Hardened Paste of Geopolymer Cements,” Ceramics-Silikáty, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 225-229, 2005.
[Publisher Link]
[46] A. Benazzouk, O. Douzane, and M. Quéneudec, “Transport of Fluids in Cement-Rubber Composites,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 21-29, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Alan E. Richardson, Kathryn A. Coventry, and Gavin Ward, “Freeze/Thaw Protection of Concrete with Optimum Rubber Crumb Content,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 96-103, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] Tung-Chai Ling, “Prediction of Density and Compressive Strength for Rubberized Concrete Blocks,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 4303-4306, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] Blessen Skariah Thomas, and Ramesh Chandra Gupta, “Long Term Behaviour of Cement Concrete Containing Discarded Tire Rubber,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 102, pp. 78-87, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[50] Piti Sukontasukkul, “Use of Crumb Rubber to Improve Thermal and Sound Properties of Pre-Cast Concrete Panel,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1084-1092, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[51] Niall Holmes, Alex Browne, and Christopher Montague, “Acoustic Properties of Concrete Panels with Crumb Rubber as a Fine Aggregate Replacement,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 73, pp. 195-204, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[52] Salmabanu Luhar, Sandeep Chaudhary, and Ismail Luhar, “Thermal Resistance of Fly Ash Based Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete, Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 19, pp. 420-428, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] N. Oikonomou, and S. Mavridou, “Improvement of Chloride Ion Penetration Resistance in Cement Mortars Modified with Rubber from Worn Automobile Tires,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 403-407, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[54] Eshmaiel Ganjian, Morteza Khorami, and Ali Akbar Maghsoudi, “Scrap-Tire-Rubber Replacement for Aggregate and Filler in Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1828-1836, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[55] Osama Youssf, Mohamed A. ElGawady, and Julie E. Mills, “Experimental Investigation of Crumb Rubber Concrete Columns under Seismic Loading,” Structures, vol. 3, pp. 13-27, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[56] G. Habert, J.B. d’Espinose de Lacaillerie, and N. Roussel, “Environmental Evaluation of Geopolymer based Concrete Production: Review of Current Research Trends,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1229-1238, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[57] Andrew Heath et al., The Potential for using Geopolymer Concrete in the Uk,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Construction Materials, vol. 166, no. 4, pp. 195-203, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[58] John L. Provis, “Geopolymers and Other Alkali Activated Materials: Why, How, and What?,” Materials and Structures, vol. 47, no. 1-2, pp. 11-25, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[59] Pradip Nath, and Prabir Kumar Sarker, “Flexural Strength and Elastic Modulus of Ambient-Cured Blended Low-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 130, pp. 22-31, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[60] J. Temuujin, A. van Riessen, and R. Williams, “Influence of Calcium Compounds on the Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash Geopolymer Pastes,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 167, no. 1-3, pp. 82-88, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[61] Susan A. Bernal, and John L. Provis, “Durability of Alkali-Activated Materials: Progress and Perspectives,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 997-1008, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[62] Prabir Kumar Sarker, “Bond Strength of Reinforcing Steel Embedded in Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Materials and Structures, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1021-1030, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[63] Khoa Tan Nguyen et al., “Analyzing the Compressive Strength of Green Fly Ash based Geopolymer Concrete using Experiment and Machine Learning Approaches,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 247, pp. 1-11, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[64] Behzad Nematollahi, Jay Sanjayan, and Faiz Uddin Ahmed Shaikh, “Synthesis of Heat and Ambient Cured One-Part Geopolymer Mixes with Different Grades of Sodium Silicate,” Ceramics International, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 5696-5704, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[65] Salmabanu Luhar, Sandeep Chaudhary, and Ismail Luhar, “Development of Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete: Strength and Durability Studies,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 204, pp. 740-753, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[66] Thong M. Pham et al., “Effect of Rubber Aggregate Size on Static and Dynamic Compressive Properties of Rubberized Concrete,” Structural Concrete, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2510-2522, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[67] P. Chindaprasirt, and W. Chalee, “Effect of Sodium Hydroxide Concentration on Chloride Penetration and Steel Corrosion of Fly Ash-based Geopolymer Concrete under Marine Site,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 63, pp. 303-310, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[68] Alisson Clay Rios da Silva et al., “Fatigue Behavior of Steel Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 16, pp. 1-9, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[69] Madiha Ahmad et al., “Utilization of a Novel Artificial Intelligence Technique (ANFIS) to Predict the Compressive Strength of Fly Ash-based Geopolymer,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 301, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[70] Jui-Sheng Chou et al., “Machine Learning in Concrete Strength Simulations: Multi-Nation Data Analytics,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 73, pp. 771-780, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[71] Yajish Giri A/L Parama Giri et al., “Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Rubberized Geopolymer Concrete: Modeling and Optimization,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1-20, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[72] J.L. Provis, S.L. Yong, and P. Duxson, “5 - Nanostructure/Microstructure of Metakaolin Geopolymers,” Geopolymers: Structures, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications, pp. 72-88, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[73] Francesco Pomponi, and Alice Moncaster, “Circular Economy for the Built Environment: A Research Framework,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143, pp. 710-718, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[74] Katherine Tebbatt Adams et al., “Circular Economy in Construction: Current Awareness, Challenges and Enablers,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 15-24, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[75] Tao Wang et al., “The Influence of Fiber on the Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Concrete: A Review,” Polymers, vol. 15. no. 4, pp. 1-29, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[76] Seemab Tayyab et al., “Influence of Mix Design Parameters on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Geopolymer Concrete: A State-of-The-Art Review,” SSRN, pp. 1-45, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[77] Osama Youssf, Mohamed A. ElGawady, and Julie E. Mills, “Static Cyclic Behaviour of FRP-Confined Crumb Rubber Concrete Columns,” Engineering Structures, vol. 113, pp. 371-387, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[78] Ana Passuello et al., “Evaluation of the Potential Improvement in the Environmental Footprint of Geopolymers using Waste-Derived Activators,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 166, pp. 680-689, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[79] V. Ramesh, B. Muthramu, and D. Rebekhal, “A Review of Sustainability Assessment of Geopolymer Concrete through AI-based Life Cycle Analysis,” AI in Civil Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-29, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[80] Gediminas Kastiukas et al., “Development of Precast Geopolymer Concrete via Oven and Microwave Radiation Curing with an Environmental Assessment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 255, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[81] D. Adak, M. Sarkar, and S. Mandal, “Effect of Nano-Silica on Strength and Durability of Fly Ash based Geopolymer Mortar,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 70, pp. 453-459, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[82] Wenkui Dong et al., “Electrical Resistivity and Mechanical Properties of Cementitious Composite Incorporating Conductive Rubber Fibres,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1-48, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]