Correlation Analysis between Different Core Diameters and Standard Cylinder Strength in Concrete Assessment
| International Journal of Civil Engineering |
| © 2026 by SSRG - IJCE Journal |
| Volume 13 Issue 1 |
| Year of Publication : 2026 |
| Authors : Albert Jorddy Valenzuela Inga, Heydi Karina Hinostroza Maravi, Víctor Peña Dueñas, Katia Soledad Huaman Velapatiño, Janet Yéssica Andía Arias |
10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I1P119
How to Cite?
Albert Jorddy Valenzuela Inga, Heydi Karina Hinostroza Maravi, Víctor Peña Dueñas, Katia Soledad Huaman Velapatiño, Janet Yéssica Andía Arias, "Correlation Analysis between Different Core Diameters and Standard Cylinder Strength in Concrete Assessment," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 216-229, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I1P119
Abstract:
One of the most important things to do before the assessment of the compressive strength of concrete in its original place in existing structures is the selection of the most appropriate diamond core diameter, because the use of undersized cores can lead to underestimated strength values. Thus, the focus of this paper is to investigate the influence of 2-inch, 3-inch, and 4-inch nominal diameter core diamonds on the measured compressive strength of concrete slabs prepared in the district of El Tambo, Huancayo. In order to perform an adequate analysis, a concrete slab with a target design strength (f'c) of 210 kg/cm² was cast, and different cores were extracted from it. It was also necessary to prepare standard 4"x8" cylindrical specimens from the same mix, so a reference could be obtained. After waiting for 28 days, different compressive strength tests were performed. The Results obtained from these tests showed that the smaller diamond cores, which means the ones of 2-inch and 3-inch, yielded average strengths that were significantly lower than the design strength (158.09 kg/cm² and 187.73 kg/cm², respectively). In contrast, the 4-inch cores, which are the biggest one, exhibited a higher average strength (350.27 kg/cm ²), and this exceeds both the design strength and the average reference cylinder strength. After adequate analyses, strong correlations were found between core strengths and reference cylinder strengths for all the diameters studied. In addition, quadratic regression models consistently gave the best fit (highest R²), particularly for 2-inch (R²≈0.96) and 3-inch (R²≈0.94) cores. Later, the derived quadratic models, such as y = -0.0024x² + 2.4811x - 282.62, were employed for predicting equivalent cylinder strength ('y') from the 4-inch core strength ('x'); these models offer a robust method for strength correction. To conclude, it can be argued that the core diameter has a significant impact when measuring strength, with smaller diameters giving lower results. Also, the developed quadratic models are recommended for accurately estimating concrete strength, especially when utilizing 2-inch and 3-inch cores.
Keywords:
Core, Concrete, Compressive strength, Strength, Testing, Cylinder.
References:
[1] Bijivemujla Sudheer Kumar Reddy, and Swapnil Wanjari, “Core Strength of Concrete using Newly Developed in Situ Compressive Testing Machine,” Magazine of Concrete Research, vol. 70, no. 22, pp. 1149-1156, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Aly M. Said et al., “Properties of Concrete Incorporating Nano-Silica,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 36, pp. 838-844, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Olawale O. Ayinde, Xiao-Bao Zuo, and Guang-Ji Yin, “Numerical Analysis of Concrete Degradation due to Chloride-Induced Steel Corrosion,” Advances in Concrete Construction, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 203-210, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] INACAL, NTP 339.034 Standard Test Method for Determining the Compressive Strength of Concrete in Cylindrical Samples, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/417389764/Ntp-339-034-Metodo-de-Ensayo-Normalizado-Para-La-Determinacion-de-La-Resistencia-a-La-Compresion-Del-Concreto-en-Muestras-Cilindricas
[5] Songhui Li, Yan Zhang, and Shasha Han, “Safety Inspection System and Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Concrete Structure of Gas Pipeline Tunnel based on Fuzzy Mathematics,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1-14, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Hisham Qasrawi, “Effect of the Position of Core on the Strength of Concrete of Columns in Existing Structures,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 25, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Ratna Widyawati et al., “Remaining Life Prediction of an Aged Bridge based on Concrete Core Test,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 95, pp. 88-99, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Md Ashiquzzaman, and Tausif Islam, “Defining Concrete Strength using Smaller Diameter Concrete Cores during Structural Safety Evaluations,” Structural Integrity and Life, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 61-69, 2018.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Ali Ergun, and Gokhan Kurklu, “Assessing the Relationship between the Compressive Strength of Concrete Cores and Molded Specimens,” Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 737-750, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] A. Fernández Domínguez, and JJ Howland Albear, “Correction Factors for the Compressive Strength of Concrete Specimens. Critical Analysis of Cuban and International Standards,” Construction Reports, vol. 69, no. 547, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Rómel Solís Carcaño, and Eric I. Moreno, “Influence of Moist Curing on the Compressive Strength of Concrete in a Warm Subhumid Climate,” Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 5-17, 2005.
[Google Scholar]
[12] Suhang Yang, Chuan Chen, and Zhifeng Xu, “Effect of the Core Sample in Low Aspect Ratio on Concrete Compressive Strength,” Structural Concrete, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2365-2380, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Ali M. Elsheikh, and khaled M. Eltaweel, “Influence of Core with Different Dimensions and Conditions on Compressive Strength of Concrete,” 3rd International Conference of Engineering and Science, vol. 9 no. pp. 267-275, 2024.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] S. Herald Lessly, R. Senthil, and B. Krishnakumar, “A Study on the Effect of Reinforcement on the Strength of Concrete Core,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 45, pp. 6476-6481, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] UNE, EN 13791: Assessment of in-Situ Compressive Strength in Structures and Precast Concrete Components, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://tienda.aenor.com/norma-une-en-13791-2020-n0063682
[16] Shaoce Dong, Chenggao Li, and Guijun Xian, “Environmental Impacts of Glass- and Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bar-Reinforced Seawater and Sea Sand Concrete Beams used in Marine Environments: An LCA Case Study,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] INACAL, NTP 339.059 Obtaining and Testing Diamond Cores and Sectioned Concrete Beams, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/511040119/NTP-339-059-Obtencion-y-Ensayo-de-Testigos-Diamantinos-y-Vigas-Seccionadas-de-Concreto-2-1
[18] ASTM C42/C42M-20 Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete, Advancing Standards Transforming Markets, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://store.astm.org/c0042_c0042m-20.html
[19] Hamood Bisher, “Relationship between Cylinder and Core Compressive Strength,” Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] American Society of Concrete Contractors, Technical Checklist: Concrete Core Testing, American Society of Concrete Contractors, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://ascconline.org/Portals/ASCC/TB-Concrete-Core-Testing.pdf
[21] Nihat Kabay, and Fevziye Aköz, “Investigation of Factors Affecting Core Compressive Strength and Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete,” Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 171-182, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Mustafa Tuncan et al., “Assessing Concrete Strength by Means of Small Diameter Cores,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 981-988, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] American Concrete Institute, Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete, ACI 211.1-91, Detroit, MI., 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3391012
[24] Mariusz Jaśniok, and Tomasz Jaśniok, “Corrosion Diagnostics Performed on Cores Drilled from Concrete Structures, using the Laboratory Simulation of Temperature and Relative Humidity Impact,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 1-25, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Jukka Haavisto, Ari Husso, and Anssi Laaksonen, “Compressive Strength of Core Specimens Drilled from Concrete Test Cylinders,” Structural Concrete, vol. 22, no. S1, pp. E683-E695, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Xudong Chen, Shengxing Wu, and Jikai Zhou, “Compressive Strength of Concrete Cores with Different Lengths,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 26, no. 7, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Sumie Suzuki, Tadatsugu Kage, and Shigeki Seko, “Influence that Ratio of Length to Diameter of High-Strength Concrete Core to Compressive Strength of Concrete,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, Porto, Portugal, pp. 1-8, 2011.
[Google Scholar]