Eco-Resilient Kitchen Frameworks: Civil-Interior Integration of Recycled Composites and Biophilic Aesthetics

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2026 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 13 Issue 2

Year of Publication : 2026

Authors : Shipra Wadhwa, Kratika Piparsania, Senthil Vadivel T

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I2P119

How to Cite?

Shipra Wadhwa, Kratika Piparsania, Senthil Vadivel T, "Eco-Resilient Kitchen Frameworks: Civil-Interior Integration of Recycled Composites and Biophilic Aesthetics," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13,  no. 2, pp. 284-301, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I2P119

Abstract:

Eco-friendly measures are evident everywhere, including in interior design. Greenery, organic food processing, and kitchen measures are potential trends at the moment. However, the study relates to this concept, as it discusses eco-resilient kitchen frameworks. On the other hand, the research examined the role of civil and interior professionals in integrating biophilic finishes into the kitchen interior. The study focuses on creating sustainable composite integration in modern kitchen appliances through civil engineering and design. This study presents statistical reports and several literature reviews by different authors on this subject. These facilitate different perspectives on the context, including the identification and coordination of recycled processes and material capabilities by both professionals. Also, the methodology of this study is defined as a secondary source and incorporates qualitative and thematic analysis, which perfectly addresses the research objectives. The study’s findings indicate that the use of recycled steel in the kitchen can also minimise environmental impact and lower material costs. The high-purity materials developed recycled products that meet stringent quality standards. Further, it is also evaluated that civil engineering integration can enhance collaboration among other fields and sub-disciplines of civil engineering, such as environmental science, urban planning, and architecture.

Keywords:

Recycled, Kitchen, Biophilic, Civil, Material, Resilient, Lifecycle Assessment.

References:

[1] Mohammed Awad Abuhussain et al., “Integrating Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Optimal Lifecycle Management of Complex Structures,” Structures, vol. 60, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Can B. Aktas, and Melissa M. Bilec, “Service Life Prediction of Residential Interior Finishes for Life Cycle Assessment,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 362-371, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Amira Fawzy Almaz et al., “The Future Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Design's Integration into Architectural and Interior Design Education is to Improve Efficiency, Sustainability, and Creativity,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1749-1772, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Amjad Almusaed et al., “Assessing the Impact of Recycled Building Materials on Environmental Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: A Comprehensive Framework for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1-31, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 
[5] Amay Arora, and John R. McIntyre, “Biogeneration: Bio-Inspired Architecture for Regenerative Built Environments,” Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1-16, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Gianmarco Bressanelli et al., “Towards Circular Economy in the Household Appliance Industry: an Overview of Cases,” Resources, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1-23, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Paul M. Cabacungan et al., “Sustainable Technologies for Environment-Friendly and Ecological Resilience,” International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, London, United Kingdom, pp. 745-762, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Maria Cacique, and Sheng-Jung Ou, “Biophilic Design as a Strategy for Accomplishing the Idea of Healthy, Sustainable, and Resilient Environments,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1-15, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Vincenzo Castorani et al., “Life Cycle Assessment of Home Smart Objects: Kitchen Hood Cases,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 69, pp. 499-504, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 
[10] He-in Cheong et al., “Secondary Qualitative Research Methodology using Online Data within the Context of Social Sciences,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 22, pp. 1-19, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Amanda Davis, and Robin Fisher, Kitchen & Bath Sustainable Design: Conservation, Materials, Practices, John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Bach Minh Don, Vu Thi Hong Hanh, and Le Tran Uyen Vy, “Urban Regeneration in Dran Town Application of Ecological Principles for Sustainable Spatial Development,” International Conference series on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering and Structures, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, pp. 1340-1351, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Ahmed Samir Ead et al., “Life Cycle Analysis for Green Composites: A Review of Literature Including Considerations for Local and Global Agricultural Use,” Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, vol. 16, pp. 1-20, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Mohamed S. Abd. Elforgani, Akram A.N. Alabsi, and Abbas Alwarafi, “Strategic Approaches to Design Teams for Construction Quality Management and Green Building Performance,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1-17, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Paul Emmons, Marcia Feuerstein, and Negar Goljan, Finishing in Architecture: Polishing, Completing, Ending, 1st ed., Taylor & Francis, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Claudio Favi et al., “Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Cooking Appliances in Italian Kitchens,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 186, pp. 430-449, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Ali Akbar Firoozi et al., “Emerging Trends in Sustainable Building Materials: Technological Innovations, Enhanced Performance, and Future Directions,” Results in Engineering, vol. 24, pp. 1-37, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Francesco Foroni et al., “A Multi‐Analyses Approach of Inductive/Deductive Asymmetry in the Affective Priming Paradigm,” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 550-565, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Smart Kitchen Appliances Market (2024 - 2030), Grand View Research, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/smart-kitchen-appliances-market
[20] Sustainable Home Decor Market is Expected to Grow from USD 330 Billion in 2021 to USD 525.96 Billion by 2029: GreyViews, Digital Media Innovations, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.globenewswire.com/fr/news-release/2022/12/13/2572833/0/en/Sustainable-Home-Decor-Market-is-expected-to-grow-from-USD-330-billion-in-2021-to-USD-525-96-billion-by-2029-GreyViews.html
[21] Sofie Hagejärd et al., “Designing for Circularity-Addressing Product Design, Consumption Practices and Resource Flows in Domestic Kitchens,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1-20, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Dorothy Day Huntsman, and Grzegorz Bulaj, “Healthy Dwelling: Design of Biophilic Interior Environments Fostering Self-Care Practices for People Living with Migraines, Chronic Pain, and Depression,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1-16, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Idowu D. Ibrahim et al., “Recent Recycling Innovations to Facilitate Sustainable Packaging Materials: A Review,” Recycling, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1-13, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Lahiba Imtiaz et al., “Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Recycled Aggregate Concrete, Geopolymer Concrete, and Recycled Aggregate-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 24, pp. 1-19, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Olaseni Oladehinde Iyiola, “Integrated Lifecycle Assessment and Carbon Accounting of Building Engineering Systems Under Circular Economy Frameworks,” International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1823-1844, 2025.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Sangilimuthukumar Jeyaguru, and Senthil Muthu Kumar Thiagamani, “12 - Evolution and Recent Advancement of Composite Materials in Household Applications,” Applications of Composite Materials in Engineering, pp. 303-315, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Oleg Kapliński, “Architecture: Integration of Art and Engineering,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1-9, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Guus Keusters, Hans Bakker, and Erik-Jan Houwing, “Improving the Performance of Civil Engineering Projects through the Integrated Design Process,” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 344-364, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Masoumeh Khanzadeh, “Enhancing User Experience in Interior Architecture through Biophilic Design: A Case Study of Urban Residential Spaces,” New Design Ideas, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 137-168, 2024.
[Google Scholar]
[30] O.M. Konsyna, and A.R. Bondarenko, “Biophilic Design as One of the Methods for Planning Sustainable and Smart Environment,” Construction and Architecture, vol. 3-2, no. 88, pp. 4-11, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Andrey E. Krauklis et al., “Composite Material Recycling Technology-State-of-the-Art and Sustainable Development for the 2020s,” Journal of Composites Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-33, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Ksawery Kuligowski et al., “Evaluation of Kitchen Waste Recycling as Organic N-Fertiliser for Sustainable Agriculture under Cool and Warm Seasons,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1-22, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Min-Yen Lu, and Wen-Hwa Ko, “Sustainable Preparation Behavior for Kitchen Staff in Order to Limit Food Waste,” Foods, vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 1-18, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Beth McGee, and, Nam-Kyu Park, “Colour, Light, and Materiality: Biophilic Interior Design Presence in Research and Practice,” Interiority, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27-52, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Qingchen Meng et al., “Anaerobic Digestion and Recycling of Kitchen Waste: A Review,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1745-1762, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Zihan Mi, “Sustainable Architectural Practices: Integrating Green Design, Smart Technologies, and Ultra-Low Energy Concepts,” Theoretical and Natural Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 62-67, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Evanjelina Eva Neri, “Challenging Assumptions: Exploring the Extent of Biophilic Design in Interior Environments on Attention Restoration,” Dissertations & Theses, The Florida State University, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Magdalena Maria Popowska, and Monika Sady, “Universities’ Journey towards Sustainability-Systematic Literature Review,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 596-615, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Mohammad Rajabalinejad, Leo van Dongen, and Merishna Ramtahalsing, “Systems Integration Theory and Fundamentals,” Safety and Reliability, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 83-113, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Manickam Ramesh et al., “A Critical Review on Wood-Based Polymer Composites: Processing, Properties, and Prospects,” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1-35, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]   
[41] P. Ricciardi, Elisa Belloni, and F. Cotana, “Innovative Panels with Recycled Materials: Thermal and Acoustic Performance and Life Cycle Assessment,” Applied Energy, vol. 134, pp. 150-162, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Leonor Rodriguez, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Secondary Qualitative Data Analysis: What, Why and How, Handbook of Qualitative Research Methodologies in Workplace Contexts, pp. 133-156, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Judy Rose et al., Enriching Thematic Analysis with Clustering Techniques: Applying Mixed Analysis to Interviews about Big Data Linkage, Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Business and Management, pp. 310-327, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Junaid Saleem et al., “Assessing the Environmental Footprint of Recycled Plastic Pellets: A Life-Cycle Assessment Perspective,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 32, pp. 1-11, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 
[45] Karla Scherer, Aguinaldo dos Santos, and Debra Lilley, “Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Guidelines for Cooking Appliances,” Advanced Design Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 94-108, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Meng-Fen Shih, Chiu-Yue Lin, and Chyi-How Lay, “Comparison of Potential Environmental Impacts and Waste-to-Energy Efficiency for Kitchen Waste Treatment Scenarios in Central Taiwan,” Processes, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1-12, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Hamed Taherdoost, “What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, their Applications, Types, and Limitations,” Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53-63, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] A. Van Stijn et al., “Design Guidelines for Circular Building Components Based on LCA and MFA: The Case of the Circular Kitchen,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 588, no. 4, pp. 1-9, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] Cristina Veres, and Maria Tănase, “A Bibliometric and Systematic Review of the Use of Recycled Composite Materials with an Emphasis on the Mechanical Performance of Structures,” Materials, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1-22, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[50] Joachim Walther, Nicola W. Sochacka, and Nadia N. Kellam, “Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626-659, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[51] Wentao Wang et al., “Muti-Energy Field-Assisted Grinding of Hard and Brittle Materials: Tools, Equipment and Mechanisms,” Intelligent and Sustainable Manufacturing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-26, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[52] Yong Xiang et al., “Research on Sustainability Evaluation of Green Building Engineering based on Artificial Intelligence and Energy Consumption,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 11378-11391, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] Zhidiankui Xu et al., “Using Co-Design to Explore New Trends in Future Kitchen Designs: An Exploratory Workshop Study of College Students in China,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1-22, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[54] Weijie Zhong, Torsten Schröder, and Juliette Bekkering, “Biophilic Design in Architecture and its Contributions to Health, Well-Being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review,” Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 114-141, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[55] Jun Zhou, “Synergizing Architectural Design, Structural Restoration, and Civil Engineering or Sustainable Urban Development,” SHS Web of Conferences: 3rd International Conference on Urban Planning and Regional Economy (UPRE 2024), vol. 192, pp. 1-5, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]