Smart Bot Detection for Twitter/X: A Systematic Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning based Methods

International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering |
© 2025 by SSRG - IJECE Journal |
Volume 12 Issue 7 |
Year of Publication : 2025 |
Authors : Rekha Jangra, Abhishek Kajal |
How to Cite?
Rekha Jangra, Abhishek Kajal, "Smart Bot Detection for Twitter/X: A Systematic Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning based Methods," SSRG International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 148-173, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488549/IJECE-V12I7P112
Abstract:
A significant rise in online social networks has been witnessed over the past decade, particularly on social media network platforms such as X (previously known as Twitter), Instagram, and Facebook accounts, which recorded a steep hike. This further leads to the rise of automated accounts known as bots, devised to replicate the behavior of organic user accounts automatically to disseminate false information or spread spam. For identifying these social bot accounts, many machine and deep learning methods have been proposed on X accounts' features, and based on tweets’ text contents through sentiment analysis for diverse datasets; the leading works have been reviewed in this research article. However, comparing the efficacy of diverse research works in terms of problem statement, methodologies, and various evaluation parameters was extremely difficult. However, the authors put effort into a systematic literature review. It has been observed that SVM followed by RF are the most used ML algorithms for Twitter bot detection, where RF achieved the highest accuracy of 94.87% on account profile features. LSTM is also observed as the most employed DL algorithm for Twitter bot detection. While RoBERTa achieved the highest accuracy of about 98% on the COVID-19 dataset, followed by CNN on the Arabic Spam dataset. The article also summarizes the potential of methods to enhance bot detection performance and scalability over machine and deep learning methods. In addition, authors presented a demonstration with the execution of leading ML and DL methods with the combination of ReLU activation function and Adam optimizer on diverse X datasets. They presented the respective results in tabular form. During simulation with leading ML-based techniques, accuracy yielded for SVM, Naïve Bayes, and Random Forest was 81.38%, 79.47%, and 85.77%, respectively. At the same time, accuracy in the case of DL-based LSTM and Bi-LSTM approaches was 88% and 89%, respectively. Overall, this review article will provide a significant blueprint for future research on enhancing the performance of bot detection models for different online social networks.
Keywords:
Online social networks, Bot detection, Twitter dataset, Machine Learning, Deep Learning.
References:
[1] Sneha Kudugunta, and Emilio Ferrara, “Deep Neural Networks for Bot Detection,” Information Sciences, vol. 467, pp. 312-322, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Zineb Ellaky, Faouzia Benabbou, and Sara Ouahabi, “Systematic Literature Review of Social Media Bots Detection Systems,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1-31, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Jefferson Viana Fonseca Abreu et al., “Twitter Bot Detection with Reduced Feature Set,” 2020 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), Arlington, VA, USA, pp. 1-6, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Yousof Al-Hammadi, Uwe Aickelin, and Julie Greensmith, “DCA for Bot Detection,” 2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2008), pp. 1807-1816, 2088.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Xiaomei Dong et al., “A Novel Bot Detection Algorithm Based on API Call Correlation,” 2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Yantai, China pp. 1157-1162, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Randall Wald et al., “Predicting Susceptibility to Social Bots on Twitter,” 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration (IRI), San Francisco, CA, pp. 6-13, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] David Zhao et al., “Botnet Detection Based on Traffic Behavior Analysis and Flow Intervals,” Computer Security, vol. 39, pp. 2-16, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Christos Troussas et al., “Sentiment Analysis of Facebook Statuses using Naive Bayes Classifier for Language Learning,” 2013 IEEE International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), Piraeus, Greece, pp. 1-6, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] John P. Dickerson, Vadim Kagan, and V.S. Subrahmanian, “Using Sentiment to Detect Bots on Twitter: Are Humans more Opinionated than bots?” 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014), Beijing, China, pp. 620-627, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Fabian Schäfer Fabian, Stefan Evert, and Philipp Heinrich, “Japan's 2014 General Election: Political Bots, Right-Wing Internet Activism, and Prime Minister Shinzō Abe's Hidden Nationalist Agenda,” Big Data, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 294-309, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Maeve Duggan, and Aaron Smith, “The Political Environment on Social Media,” Report, Pew Research Center, pp. 1-39, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Björn Gambäck, and Utpal Kumar Sikdar, “Using Convolutional Neural Networks to Classify Hate-Speech,” Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 85-90, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] V. Sivasangari et al., “Isolating Rumors Using Sentiment Analysis,” Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 181-200, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] John Seymour, and Philip Tully, “Generative Models for Spear Phishing Posts on Social Media,” arXiv Preprint, pp. 1-5, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Zhouhan Chen, and Devika Subramanian, “An Unsupervised Approach to Detect Spam Campaigns that Use Botnets on Twitter,” arXiv Preprint, pp. 1-7, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Chi Zhang et al, “Determining the Scale of Impact from Denial-of-Service Attacks in Real Time Using Twitter,” arXiv Preprint, pp. 1-11, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Abu Foysal, Safat Islam, and Touhidur Rahaman, “Classification of AI Powered Social Bots on Twitter by Sentiment Analysis and Data Mining through SVM,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 177, no. 25, pp. 13-19, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Octavio Loyola-González et al., “Contrast Pattern-Based Classification for Bot Detection on Twitter,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 45800-45817, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Luca Corti et al., “Social Media Analysis of Twitter Tweets Related to ASD in 2019–2020, with Particular Attention to COVID-19: Topic Modelling and Sentiment Analysis,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 9, pp. 1-17, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Heng Ping, and Sujuan Qin, “A Social Bots Detection Model Based on Deep Learning Algorithm,” 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT), Chongqing, China, pp. 1435-1439, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] George Grekousis, “Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning in Urban Geography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 74, pp. 244-256, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Despoina Antonakaki, Paraskevi Fragopoulou, and Sotiris Ioannidis, “A Survey of Twitter Research: Data Model, Graph Structure, Sentiment Analysis and Attacks,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 164, pp. 1-25, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Alexander Shevtsov et al., “Explainable Machine Learning Pipeline for Twitter Bot Detection during the 2020 US Presidential Elections,” Software Impacts, vol. 13, pp. 1-2, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Rao Hamza Ali et al., “A Large-Scale Sentiment Analysis of Tweets Pertaining to the 2020 US Presidential Election,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 9, pp. 1-12, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Jorge Rodríguez-Ruiz et al., “A One-Class Classification Approach for Bot Detection on Twitter,” Computers & Security, vol. 91, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Ho-Chun Herbert Chang et al., Social Bots and Social Media Manipulation in 2020, 1st ed., Handbook of Computational Social Science, Taylor & Francis, vol. 1, pp. 1-20, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Muhammad Imran Tariq et al., “A Review of Deep Learning Security and Privacy Defensive Techniques,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2020, pp. 1-18, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Bencheng Wei et al., “Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection with Deep Learning and Transfer Learning,” Arxiv Preprint, pp. 1-7, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Anshul Wadhawan, and Akshita Aggarwal, “Towards Emotion Recognition in Hindi-English Code-Mixed Data: A Transformer Based Approach,” Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis, pp. 195-202, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Ashis Kumar Chanda, “Efficacy of BERT Embeddings on Predicting Disaster from Twitter Data,” Arxiv Preprint, pp. 1-6, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Nureni Ayofe Azeez et al., “Cyberbullying Detection in Social Networks: Artificial Intelligence Approach,” Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 745-774, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Kazi Nabiul Alam et al., “Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Responses from Twitter Data,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2021, pp. 1-15, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Abdelouahid Derhab et al., “Tweet-Based Bot Detection Using Big Data Analytics,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 65988-66005, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Zihan Huang et al., “Context-Aware Legal Citation Recommendation Using Deep Learning,” Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, São Paulo, Brazil, pp. 79-88, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Dominique Geissler, and Stefan Feuerriegel, “Analyzing the Strategy of Propaganda using Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Evidence from the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 8, no. CSCW2, pp. 1-25 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Francesco Luigi De Faveri et al., “Twitter Bots Influence on the Russo-Ukrainian War During the 2022 Italian General Elections,” Conference Proceedings 9th International Symposium, SocialSec 2023: Security and Privacy in Social Networks and Big Data, Canterbury, UK, pp. 38-57, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Nisha P. Shetty, “An Enhanced Sybil Guard to Detect Bots in Online Social Networks,” Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 105-126, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Anastasia Ryzhova et al., “Training Multilingual and Adversarial Attack-Robust Models for Hate Detection on Social Media,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 213, pp. 196-204, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Sajib Kumar Saha et al., “A Comparative Study on COVID-19 Fake News Detection Using Different Transformer Based Models,” 2022 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications (ISIEA), Langkawi Island, Malaysia, pp. 1-5, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Maryam Heidari, James H Jr Jones, and Ozlem Uzuner, “Online User Profiling to Detect Social Bots on Twitter,” Arxiv Preprint, pp. 1-9, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Sumana Biswas, Karen Young, and Josephine Griffith, “A Comparison of Automatic Labelling Approaches for Sentiment Analysis,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Data Science, Technology and Applications, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 312-319, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Mark M. Bailey, “Detecting Propagators of Disinformation on Twitter Using Quantitative Discursive Analysis,” Arxiv Preprint, pp. 1-12, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Mst Shapna Akter et al., “Deep Learning Approach for Classifying the Aggressive Comments on Social Media: Machine Translated Data Vs Real Life Data,” 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Osaka, Japan, pp. 5646-5655, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Atheer S. Alhassun, and Murad A. Rassam, “A Combined Text-Based and Metadata-Based Deep-LearningFramework for the Detection of Spam Accounts on the SocialMedia Platform Twitter,” Processes, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1-24, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] Anisha P Rodrigues et al., “[Retracted] Real-Time Twitter Spam Detection and Sentiment Analysis Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2022, pp. 1-15, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Vasiliki Vrana et al., “EU Citizens’ Twitter Discussions of the 2022–23 Energy Crisis: A Content and Sentiment Analysis on the Verge of a Daunting Winter,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-22, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Zhenyu Lei et al., “BIC: Twitter Bot Detection with Text-Graph Interaction and Semantic Consistency,” Arxiv Preprint, pp. 1-13, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] Román A. Mendoza-Urdiales et al., “Twitter Sentiment Analysis and Influence on Stock Performance Using Transfer Entropy and EGARCH Methods,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1-17, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] Xiao Yu et al., “GPT Paternity Test: GPT Generated Text Detection with GPT Genetic Inheritance,” Arxiv, Report, pp. 1-12, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[50] Yingguang Yang et al., “RoSGAS: Adaptive Social Bot Detection with Reinforced Self-Supervised GNN Architecture Search,” ACM Transactions on the Web, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1-31, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[51] Yue Wang et al., “Exploring Topic Models to Discern Cyber Threats on Twitter: A Case Study on Log4Shell,” Intelligent Systems with Applications, vol. 20, pp. 1-14, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[52] Alexander Shevtsov et al., “BotArtist: Generic Approach for Bot Detection in Twitter via Semi-Automatic Machine Learning Pipeline,” Arxiv Preprint, pp. 1-10, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] Qing Meng et al., “Predicting Hate Intensity of Twitter Conversation Threads,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 275, pp. 1-39, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[54] Innocent Mbona, and Jan H.P. Eloff, “Classifying Social Media Bots as Malicious or Benign Using Semi-Supervised Machine Learning,” Journal of Cyber Security, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[55] Mohammad Majid Akhtar et al., “False Information, Bots and Malicious Campaigns: Demystifying Elements of Social Media Manipulations,” Arxiv Preprint, pp. 1-21, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[56] Fawaz Khaled Alarfaj et al., “Twitter Bot Detection Using Diverse Content Features and Applying Machine Learning Algorithms,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1-17, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[57] Oliver Beatson et al., “Automation on Twitter: Measuring the Effectiveness of Approaches to Bot Detection,” Social Science Computer Review, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 181-200, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[58] Feng Wei, and Uyen Trang Nguyen, “Twitter Bot Detection Using Neural Networks and Linguistic Embeddings,” IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, vol. 4, pp. 218-230, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[59] Chris Hays et al., “Simplistic Collection and Labeling Practices Limit the Utility of Benchmark Datasets for Twitter Bot Detection,” Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference, Austin TX USA, pp. 3660-3669, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[60] Yuhan Liu et al., “BotMoE: Twitter Bot Detection with Community-Aware Mixtures of Modal-Specific Experts,” Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Taipei Taiwan, pp. 485-495, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[61] Nirmalya Thakur, “Sentiment Analysis and Text Analysis of the Public Discourse on Twitter about COVID-19 and MPox,” Big Data Cognitive Computing, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1-21, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[62] Tarık Talan, Adem Korkmaz, and Cemal Aktürk, “Analyzing the User'sSentiments of ChatGPT Using Twitter Data,” Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 202-214, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[63] Kadhim Hayawi et al., “Social Media Bot Detection with Deep Learning Methods: A Systematic Review,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 35, pp. 8903-8918, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[64] Malak Aljabri et al., “Machine Learning-Based Social Media Bot Detection: A Comprehensive Literature Review,” Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 13, pp. 1-40, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[65] Febriora Nevia Pramitha et al., “Twitter Bot Account Detection Using Supervised Machine Learning,” 2021 4th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, pp. 379-383, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[66] Pandu Gumelar Pratama, and Nur Aini Rakhmawati, “Social Bot Detection on 2019 Indonesia President Candidate’s Supporter’s Tweets,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 161, pp. 813-820, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[67] Kristo Radion Purba, David Asirvatham, and Raja Kumar Murugesan, “Classification of Instagram Fake Users Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2763-2772, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[68] A. Ramalingaiah, S. Hussaini, and S. Chaudhari, “Twitter Bot Detection Using Supervised Machine Learning,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series: International Conference on Mechatronics and Artificial Intelligence, Gurgaon, India, vol. 1950, pp. 1-12, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[69] F. Rangel, Francisco, and Paolo Rosso, “Overview of the 7th Author Profiling Task at PAN 2019: Bots and Gender Profiling in Twitter,” Working Notes of CLEF 2019 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 1-36, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[70] Mohsen Sayyadiharikandeh et al., “Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifiers,” Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, Virtual Event Ireland, pp. 2725-2732, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[71] Rachit Shukla, Adwitiya Sinha, and Ankit Chaudhary, “TweezBot: An AI-Driven Online Media Bot Identification Algorithm for Twitter Social Networks,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1-21, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[72] Hrushikesh Shukla, Nakshatra Jagtap, and Balaji Patil, “Enhanced Twitter Bot Detection Using Ensemble Machine Learning,” 2021 6th International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Coimbatore, India, pp. 930-936, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[73] Indira Sen et al., “Worth its Weight in Likes: Towards Detecting Fake Likes on Instagram,” Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, pp. 205-209, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[74] Ali Siddiqui, “Facebook 2019 Q1 Earnings: The Social Media Giant Boasts 2.7 Billion Monthly Active Users on Its All Services,” Digital Information World, Report, 2019.
[Publisher Link]
[75] Surendra Sedhai, and Aixin Sun, “Semi-Supervised Spam Detection in Twitter Stream,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 169-175, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[76] Somya Ranjan Sahoo, and B.B. Gupta, “Popularity-Based Detection of Malicious Content in Facebook Using Machine Learning Approach,” Conference Proceedings First International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Computational Intelligence, pp. 163-176, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[77] Sandeep Singh Sengar et al., “Bot Detection in Social Networks Based on Multilayered Deep Learning Approach,” Sensors & Transducers, vol. 244, no. 5, pp. 37-43, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[78] Chengcheng Shao et al., “The Spread of Low-Credibility Content by Social Bots,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, pp. 1-9, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[79] J.I. Sheeba, S. Pradeep Devaneyan, and G. Velvizhi “Detection of Spambot Using Random Forest Algorithm,” Proceedings of International Conference on Advancements in Computing & Management (ICACM), Jaipur, India, pp. 746-753, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[80] Surendra Sedhai, and Aixin Sun, “HSpam14: A Collection of 14 Million Tweets for Hashtag-Oriented Spam Research,” Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Santiago Chile, pp. 223-232, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[81] Elisa Shearer, and Amy Mitchell, “News Use Across Social Media Platforms in 2020,” Pew Research Center, Report, pp. 1-18, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[82] Arafatur Rahman et al., “SPY-BOT: Machine Learning-Enabled Post-Filtering for Social Network-Integrated Industrial Internet of Things,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 113, pp. 1-20, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[83] Fatih Cagatay Akyon, and M. Esat Kalfaoglu, “Instagram Fake and Automated Account Detection,” 2019 Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications Conference (ASYU), Izmir, Turkey, pp. 1-7, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[84] Erdem Beğenilmiş, and Suzan Uskudarli, “Organized Behavior Classification of Tweet Sets Using Supervised Learning Methods,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, Novi Sad Serbia, pp. 1-9, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[85] Mohammed Basil Albayati, and Ahmad Mousa Altamimi, “An Empirical Study for Detecting Fake Facebook Profiles Using Supervised Mining Techniques,” Informatica, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 77-86, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[86] Mohammed Basil Albayati, and Ahmad Mousa Altamimi, “MDFP: A Machine Learning Model for Detecting Fake Facebook Profiles Using Supervised and Unsupervised Mining Techniques,” International Journal of Simulation Systems, Science & Technology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[87] Abeer Aldayel, and Walid Magdy, “Characterizing the Role of Bots’ in Polarized Stance on Social Media,” Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 12, pp. 1-24, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[88] Atheer S. Alhassun, and Murad A. Rassam, “A Combined Text-Based and Metadata-Based Deep-Learning Framework for the Detection of Spam Accounts on the Social Media Platform Twitter,” Processes, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1-24, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[89] Eiman Alothali et al., “Real Time Detection of Social Bots on Twitter Using Machine Learning and Apache Kafka,” 2021 5th Cyber Security in Networking Conference (CSNet), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, pp. 98-102, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[90] Eiman Alothali, Kadhim Hayawi, and Hany Alashwal, “Hybrid Feature Selection Approach to Identify Optimal Features of Profile Metadata to Detect Social Bots in Twitter,” Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 11, pp. 1-15, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[91] Eiman Alothali et al., “Detecting Social Bots on Twitter: A Literature Review,” 2018 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT), Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, pp. 175-180, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[92] Panagiotis Andriotis, and Atsuhiro Takasu, “Emotional Bots: Content-Based Spammer Detection on Social Media,” 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), Hong Kong, China, pp. 1-8, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[93] Ahmed Anwar, and Ussama Yaqub, “Bot Detection in Twitter Landscape Using Unsupervised Learning,” Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Seoul Republic of Korea, pp. 329-330, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[94] Sameh M. Attia, Ahmed M. Mattar, and Khaled M. Badran, “Bot Detection Using Multi-Input Deep Neural Network Model in Social Media,” 2022 13th International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEENG), Cairo, Egypt, pp. 71-75, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[95] S. Barhate et al., “Twitter Bot Detection and their Influence in Hashtag Manipulation,” 2020 IEEE 17th India Council International Conference (INDICON), New Delhi, India, pp. 1-7, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[96] Muhammad Bazm, and Masoud Asadpour, “Behavioral Modeling of Persian Instagram Users to Detect Bots,” Arxiv Preprint, pp. 1-8, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[97] Loukas Ilias, Ioannis Michail Kazelidis, and Dimitris Askounis, “Multimodal Detection of Bots on X (Twitter) Using Transformers,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 19, pp. 7320-7334, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[98] Amine Sallah et al., “Fine-Tuned Understanding: Enhancing Social Bot Detection with Transformer-Based Classification,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 118250-118269, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[99] Zineb Ellaky, and Faouzia Benabbou, “Political Social Media Bot Detection: Unveiling Cutting-Edge Feature Selection and Engineering Strategies in Machine Learning Model Development,” Scientific African, vol. 25, pp. 1-20, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[100] Ashkan Dehghan et al., “Detecting Bots in Social-Networks using Node and Structural Embeddings,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 10, pp. 1-37, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[101] Amrit Kumar Singha et al., “Analyzing Numerical Patterns in Twitter Data: Unveiling Fake and Bot Accounts During Telangana State Elections,” 2024 IEEE 13th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), Jabalpur, India pp. 407-412, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[102] Maryam Vahid, and Reza Ravanmehr, “Effective Bot Detection in Twitter using Deep Boltzmann Machine,” 2024 10th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR), Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of, pp. 303-308, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[103] Rubén Sánchez-Corcuera, Arkaitzs Zubiaga, and Aitor Almeida, “Early Detection and Prevention of Malicious User Behavior on Twitter Using Deep Learning Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 6649-6661, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[104] Xiujuan Wang et al., “Unsupervised Twitter Social Bot Detection Using Deep Contrastive Graph Clustering,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 293, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[105] Olmar Arranz-Escudero, Lara Quijano-Sanchez, and Federico Liberatore, “Enhancing Misinformation Countermeasures: A Multimodal Approach to Twitter Bot Detection,” Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 15, pp. 1-22, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[106] Antonia Egli et al., “Bad Robot? The Benevolent Use of Automated Software and Social Bots by Influencers in the #Antivaxx Discourse on Twitter,” Online Information Review, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 44-61, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[107] Di Huang, Jinbao Song, and Xingyu Zhang, “Semi-Supervised Social Bot Detection with Relational Graph Attention Transformers and Characteristics of the Social Environment,” Information Fusion, vol. 118, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[108] James Giroux et al., “Unmasking Social Bots: How Confident Are We?,” EPJ Data Science, vol. 14, pp. 1-19, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]