ML-Based Advanced Electrical Signal Decomposition using the Hilbert-Huang Transform and CatBoost Classification for Acoustic Signal-Driven Smart Tool Wear Detection
| International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering |
| © 2026 by SSRG - IJEEE Journal |
| Volume 13 Issue 2 |
| Year of Publication : 2026 |
| Authors : Amuthakkannan Rajakannu, K. Vijayalakshmi, Ramachandran KP, Sri Rajkavin AV |
10.14445/23488379/IJEEE-V13I2P104
How to Cite?
Amuthakkannan Rajakannu, K. Vijayalakshmi, Ramachandran KP, Sri Rajkavin AV, "ML-Based Advanced Electrical Signal Decomposition using the Hilbert-Huang Transform and CatBoost Classification for Acoustic Signal-Driven Smart Tool Wear Detection," SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 60-70, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488379/IJEEE-V13I2P104
Abstract:
CNC machines are used in production industries for batch production. In CNC machining, a minor issue can cause production downtime, reducing productivity and profit for the Industry. In CNC machines, drilling machine maintenance is crucial because of the complexity of the drill tools. Drill tools have complex shapes and geometries, making tool wear prediction particularly challenging. Tool wear in CNC drilling severely hinders performance and affects the dimensional accuracy and surface finish obtained. This paper presents a machine-learning-based approach to drill wear detection using the Hilbert–Huang Transform for feature extraction from airborne Acoustic Emission (AE) signal and the CatBoost algorithm for classification. For controlled drilling operations, AE signals from four wear-condition samples representing Healthy Tool (HT), Low Wear (LW), Medium Wear (MW), and Severe Wear (SW) were recorded. Wear levels of 0.3mm,0.6mm, and 0.9mm for the drill bits of 3.0 mm, 3.2 mm, 3.4 mm, 3.6 mm, and 3.8 mm diameters were created using Electrochemical Machining in the Lab. Using AE sensors, the signals were collected and converted into the required format with the support of signal conditioning and a data acquisition system. LabVIEW software was used to display the signal, and it was then decomposed using the Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) to obtain the required Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs). Features needed for classification, such as magnitude, entropy, and instantaneous frequency, were selected in the time-frequency domain. These features were used as input to a classifier (CatBoost), which was trained and evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. HHT-CatBoost achieved 99.1% accuracy, indicating a promising sign for the proposed algorithm in real-time maintenance for small- to medium-sized datasets.
Keywords:
CNC tool wear, Hilbert-Huang Transform, Acoustic Emission, CatBoost Algorithm.
References:
[1] Swathi Kotha Amarnath et al., “Combining Sensor Fusion and a Machine Learning Framework for Accurate Tool Wear Prediction During Machining,” Machines, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1-15, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Zheng Gong, and Dehong Huo, “Tool Condition Monitoring in Micro Milling of Brittle Materials,” Precision Engineering, vol. 87, pp. 11-22, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Ravi Sekhar et al., “Noise Robust Classification of Carbide Tool Wear in Machining Mild Steel using a Texture-Extraction-based Transfer Learning Approach for Predictive Maintenance,” Results in Control and Optimization, vol. 17, pp. 1-26, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Changjuan Zhang et al., “Tool Wear Status Monitoring Under Laser-Ultrasonic Compound Cutting based on Acoustic Emission and Deep Learning,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2411-2421, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Ayman Mohamed et al., “Tool Condition Monitoring for High-Performance Machining Systems-A Review,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1-31, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Davy Rajeev et al., “Cutting-Edge Tool Wear Monitoring in AISI4140 Steel Hard Turning using Least-Square Support Vector Machine,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1-16, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Tanner Jones, and Yang Cao, “Tool Wear Prediction based on Multisensor Data Fusion and Machine Learning,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 137, no. 9, pp. 5213-5225, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Jun-Hong Zhou et al., “Tool Wear Monitoring Using Acoustic Emissions by Dominant-Feature Identification,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 547-559, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Norden E. Huang et al., “The Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Hilbert Spectrum for Nonlinear and Non-Stationary Time Series Analysis,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, London, vol. 454, no. 1971, pp. 903-995, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Yaping Zhang et al., “Tool Wear Condition Monitoring Method based on Deep Learning with Force Signals,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1-17, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Hui Li, Yuping Zhang, and Haiqi Zheng, “Wear Detection in Gear System using Hilbert-Huang Transform,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1781-1789, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Paweł Twardowski et al., “Identification of Tool Wear using Acoustic Emission Signal and Machine Learning Methods,” Precision Engineering, vol. 72, pp. 738-744, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Viet Q. Vu, Tien-Ninh Bui, and Minh-Quang Tran, “AI-based Tool Wear Prediction with Feature Selection from Sound Signal Analysis,” Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 1-14, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Isaac Opeyemi Olalere, and Oludolapo Akanni Olanrewaju, “Tool and Workpiece Condition Classification using Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) with Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) of Vibration Signals and Machine Learning Models,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1-20, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] J. Emerson Raja, Loo Chu Kiong, and Lim Way Soong, “Hilbert-Huang Transform-based Emitted Sound Signal Analysis for Tool Flank Wear Monitoring,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 2219-2226, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Jerome H. Friedman, “Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1189-1232, 2001.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Rodrigo Panosso Zeilmann, and Jean Lucca Nunes Subtil, “LightGBM and CatBoost for Tool Wear Prediction in Milling with Drag-Finished Cutting Edges,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 137, no. 9-10, pp. 4631-4643, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Candice Bentéjac, Anna Csörgő, and Gonzalo Martínez-Muñoz, “A Comparative Analysis of Gradient Boosting Algorithms,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1937-1967, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Tomas KALVODA, Yean-Ren HWANG, and Martin VRABEC, “Application of the Hilbert-Huang Transform to Tool-Wear Monitoring in the Machining Process,” Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers: Proceedings of the International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st Century (LEM21), pp. 465-470, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] C.V. Prasshanth, and V. Sugumaran, “Tire Wear Monitoring using Feature Fusion and CatBoost Classifier,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1-28, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Dany Katamba Mpoyi et al., “Wear Monitoring based on Vibration Measurement During Machining: An Application of FDM and EMD,” Measurement: Sensors, vol. 32, pp. 1-9, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Zhixiong Li, Rui Liu, and Dazhong Wu, “Data-Driven Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Monitoring with Audio Signals and Machine Learning,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 48, pp. 66-76, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Dylan Drew et al., “Application of Machine Learning for Tool Condition Monitoring using Sensor-Integrated Tooling,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 133, pp. 66-71, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Yung-Hsiang Hung et al., “Tool Wear Classification based on Support Vector Machine and Deep Learning Models,” Sensors and Materials, vol. 36, no. 11(2), pp. 4815-4833, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Devarajan Kaliyannan et al., “Tool Condition Monitoring in the Milling Process using Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning,” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1-19, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Meiliang Chen et al., “Tool Wear Monitoring based on the Combination of Machine Vision and Acoustic Emission,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 3881-3897, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]