Construction of Autonomous Learning Strategies in Secondary School English under the Framework of Macroscopic Vision

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
© 2023 by SSRG - IJHSS Journal
Volume 10 Issue 5
Year of Publication : 2023
Authors : Xu Peng, Cai Lingling
pdf
How to Cite?

Xu Peng, Cai Lingling, "Construction of Autonomous Learning Strategies in Secondary School English under the Framework of Macroscopic Vision," SSRG International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 10,  no. 5, pp. 5-14, 2023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V10I5P102

Abstract:

The macroscopic teaching method is an instructional approach that integrates unit content to guide students in autonomous exploration. The macroscopic teaching approach, driven by core competencies, emphasizes the shift from surface-level to deep-level essential learning with transferable and enduring features. It also emphasizes the shift from memorizing knowledge points to learning and applying content, methods, and strategies and the shift from fragmented learning to structured disciplinary perspectives. The article further discusses the cultivation path of autonomous learning ability from three levels: "consciousness-action-ability", which involves cultivating awareness of autonomous learning, creating opportunities for practical action, and providing platforms for demonstrating abilities. Lastly, the author reviews traditional measurement techniques and several major scales for autonomous learning and emphasizes innovative measurement techniques.

Keywords:

Macroscopic unit, Secondary school English, Autonomous learning, Metacognitive strategies.

References:

[1] Sang Qingsong, "On the Cultivation of Problem Solving Ability of Strategic Learners," Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, no. 9, pp. 34-37, 2002.
[Publisher Link]
[2] Q. Wang, M. Zhou, and M. Cai, "Overall Teaching Design of High School English Unit Based on Big Idea," Foreign Language Teaching in Schools (Middle Version), vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2021.
[3] J, Xu, "The whole Teaching Design of Junior Middle School English Unit Based on Thematic Meaning Inquiry," Foreign Language Teaching in Schools, vol. 46, no.3, p. 6, 2023.
[4] C. Chen, and H. Lu, "The Influence Mechanism, Effect and Implementation Strategy of Large Unit Whole Teaching on Students Structured Thinking," Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science), no. 6, pp. 13-22, 2023.
[Publisher Link]
[5] J. Xu, "A Study on the Development Rules and Influencing Factors of Chinese College Students' Autonomous English Learning Ability," Beijing: Forigen Language Teaching and Research Press, 2014.
[6] H. Y. Cheng, "The New Trend of Technology Development in Measuring Self-Regulated Learning in Western Countries," Educational Science, vol. 26, pp. 92-96, 2010.
[7] Putu Eka Juliana Jaya, “Increasing Learning Achievement and Student Participation Through Independent Learning Design,” SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 50-56, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[8] B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no.1, pp. 82-91, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Hayo Reinders, and Cynthia White, “Special Issue Commentary: Learner Autonomy and New Learning Environments,” Language Learning & Technology, vol.15, no. 3, pp.1-3, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Jeffrey Alan Greene, and Roger Azevedo, “Adolescents' Use of Self-Regulatory Processes and their Relation to Qualitative Mental Model Shifts While Using Hypermedia,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 36, no.2, pp. 125-148, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] F. Dugan Ronald, Examining the Construct Validity of Academic Self-Regulation Using the Survey of Academic Self-Regulation (SASR), State University of New York at Albany, Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, 2007.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Philip H Winne et al., “Supporting Self-regulated Learning with gStudy Software: The Learning Kit Project,” Technology Instruction Cognition & Learning, vol. 3, pp.105-113, 2006.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Philip H Winne, and Dianne Jamieson-Noel, “Exploring Students' Calibration of Self Reports About Study Tactics and Achievement,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 551-572, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Bernhard Schmitz, and Bettina S. Wiese, “New Perspectives for the Evaluation of Training Sessions in Self-Regulated Learning: Time-Series Analyses of Diary Data,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 64-96, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] R. Azevedo, and J. G. Cromley, “Does Training on Self-Regulated Learning Facilitate Students' Learning with Hypermedia?,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 523-535, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Anastasia Kitsantas, and Barry J. Zimmerman, “Comparing Self-Regulatory Processes Among Novice, Non-Expert, and Expert Volleyball Players: A Microanalytic Study,” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 91-105, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]