Weibull Analysis of Sabroe Chiller Reliability at Heathrow Airport: Implications for Infrastructure Management

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering |
© 2025 by SSRG - IJME Journal |
Volume 12 Issue 4 |
Year of Publication : 2025 |
Authors : Emad Al-Mahdawi, Moiz Abusin, Bed Bhattarai |
How to Cite?
Emad Al-Mahdawi, Moiz Abusin, Bed Bhattarai, "Weibull Analysis of Sabroe Chiller Reliability at Heathrow Airport: Implications for Infrastructure Management," SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 70-81, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V12I4P107
Abstract:
This study examines the reliability performance of Sabroe chillers at Heathrow Airport using Weibull statistical analysis to compare failure characteristics with industry benchmarks. The aim is to determine whether the airport’s chillers exhibit different reliability patterns that could inform maintenance strategies for critical infrastructure. The methodology involves fitting Weibull distributions to time-to-failure data for Heathrow’s chillers and corresponding industry reference data, enabling estimation of key reliability metrics, including the shape parameter (β) and B10 life. Results indicate that both datasets are in a wear-out failure phase (β > 1), but Heathrow’s chillers have a more gradual increase in failure rate (β ≈ 1.63) compared to the industry standard (β ≈ 2.35). The estimated B10 life is approximately 46,855 hours for both sets, overlapping 90% confidence intervals, suggesting comparable early-life reliability. However, the Heathrow units exhibit a more distributed failure timeline and maintain significantly lower failure incidence (around one-third of the industry baseline by 160,000 operating hours), implying more effective maintenance or operating conditions. These findings have direct implications for reliability centred maintenance and infrastructure planning, illustrating the critical role of statistical modelling in shifting maintenance paradigms from reactive repairs to proactive interventions. In essential infrastructure settings, such as international airports, data-driven approaches are pivotal for strategic asset management and ensuring operational continuity.
Keywords:
Weibull analysis, Chiller reliability, Infrastructure maintenance, Failure rate modelling, Critical cooling systems.
References:
[1] George Adams, “Heathrow Terminal 5: Energy Centre,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 161, no. 5, pp. 60-64, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Nanco Dolman, Vivekanandhan Sindhamani, and Peter Vorage, “Keeping Airports Open in Times of Climatic Extremes: Planning for Climate-Resilient Airports,” The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies, pp. 1015-1038, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Donald J. Porter, Flight Failure: Investigating the Nuts and Bolts of Air Disasters and Aviation Safety, Globe Pequot, pp. 1-216, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] P.L. Hall, and J.E Strutt, “Probabilistic Physics-of-Failure Models for Component Reliabilities using Monte Carlo Simulation and Weibull Analysis: A Parametric Study,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 233-242, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Stephen N. Luko, “A Review of the Weibull Distribution and Selected Engineering Applications,” SAE Transactions, vol. 108, pp. 398 412, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Abdullah A. Alabdulkarim, Peter D. Ball, and Ashutosh Tiwari, “Applications of Simulation in Maintenance Research,” World Journal of Modelling and Simulation, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 14-37, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Danxu Zhang et al., “Efficiency and Reliability Joint Optimization of Chiller Plants Based on a Hybrid Model,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 3224-3231, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Nofirman Firdaus, Bambang Teguh Prasetyo, and Thomas Luciana, “Chiller: Performance Deterioration and Maintenance,” Energy Engineering, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 55-80, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Chengchu Yan, Qi Cheng, and Hao Cai, “Life-Cycle Optimization of a Chiller Plant with Quantified Analysis of Uncertainty and Reliability in Commercial Buildings,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1-18, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Harendra Yadav et al., “Fuzzy Reliability Analysis of a Multi-Chiller System based on Modern Analytics,” International Academy of Physical Sciences, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 29-40, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Ibrahim Yusuf et al., “Performance Optimisation of Serial Chilled Water System under M-Out-of-N: G Policy,” International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 376-399, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] M. Xie, and C.D. Lai, “Reliability Analysis Using an Additive Weibull Model with Bathtub-Shaped Failure Rate Function,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 87-93, 1996.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Wagner Barreto-Souza, Alice Lemos de Morais, and Gauss M. Cordeiro, “The Weibull-Geometric Distribution,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 645-657, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Murad Ali et al., “Review of Common Failures in Heat Exchangers – Part I: Mechanical and Elevated Temperature Failures,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 109, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Taspia Shawkat Chowdhury et al., “A Critical Review on Gas Turbine Cooling Performance and Failure Analysis of Turbine Blades,” International Journal of Thermofluids, vol. 18, pp. 1-20, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Turbine Engine Compressor Wash, Jet Services, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://flyjetservices.com/turbine-engine-compressor-wash/
[17] Lorenzo Cremaschi, and Xiaoxiao Wu, “Effect of Fouling on the Thermal Performance of Condensers and on the Water Consumption in Cooling Tower Systems,” Heat Transfer Engineering, vol. 36, no. 7-8, pp. 663-675, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Chengchu Yan, Qi Cheng, and Hao Cai, “Life-Cycle Optimization of a Chiller Plant with Quantified Analysis of Uncertainty and Reliability in Commercial Buildings,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1548-1548, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Wenyou Jia, Zhibin Jiang, and You Li, “Scheduling to Minimize the Makespan in Large-Piece One-of-a-Kind Production with Machine Availability Constraints,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 23, pp. 9174-9182, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Mahmoud ElZahed, and Mohamed Marzouk, “Smart Archiving of Energy and Petroleum Projects Utilizing Big Data Analytics,” Automation in Construction, vol. 133, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Thomas B. Hartman, “Instrumentation Issues for Monitoring Chiller Plant Efficiency/Discussion,” ASHRAE Transactions, vol. 107, pp. 1-85, 2001.
[Google Scholar]
[22] Ayan Banerjee et al., “Ensuring Safety, Security, and Sustainability of Mission-Critical Cyber–Physical Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 283-299, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Osama Taisir R. Almeanazel, “Total Productive Maintenance Review and Overall Equipment Effectiveness Measurement,” Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 517-522, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Abbas Barabadi, “Reliability Model Selection and Validation Using Weibull Probability Plot—A Case Study,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 101, pp. 96-101, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Yolanda M. Gómez et al., “An In-Depth Review of the Weibull Model with a Focus on Various Parameterizations,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56-56, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Wanting Wang et al., “New Generalized-X Family: Modeling the Reliability Engineering Applications,” PloS one, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1 26, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Hottinger Brüel, and Kjaer Inc, Life Data Analysis, Reliasoft, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://help.reliasoft.com/weibull_quickstart/content/quickstart/life_data_analysis.htm
[28] Huda M. Alshanbari et al., “A New Modification of the Weibull Distribution: Model, Theory, and Analyzing Engineering Data Sets,” Symmetry, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1-20, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Marcello Colledani et al., “Design and Management of Manufacturing Systems for Production Quality,” CIRP Annals, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 773-796, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Yali Ren et al., “Optimizing Predictive Maintenance with Machine Learning for Reliability Improvement,” ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1-13, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Justinas JasiĆ«nas, Peter D. Lund, and Jani Mikkola, “Energy System Resilience – A Review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 150, pp. 1-18, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Raju J. Bala, R.M. Govinda, and Ch.S.N. Murthy, “Reliability Analysis and Failure Rate Evaluation of Load Haul Dump Machines Using Weibull Distribution Analysis,” Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 116-122, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Wayne Nelson, “Weibull Analysis of Reliability Data with Few or No Failures,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 140 146, 1985.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Tabassum Naz Sindhu, and Abdon Atangana, “Reliability Analysis Incorporating Exponentiated Inverse Weibull Distribution and Inverse Power Law,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 2399-2422, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]