Performance Analysis and Optimization of Undershot Water Wheel for Small-Scale Hydropower Applications

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering

© 2025 by SSRG - IJME Journal

Volume 12 Issue 9

Year of Publication : 2025

Authors : Prashanth Kumar Sanjeevaiah, Ramesh Kumar Donga, Ashish Karn

10.14445/23488360/IJME-V12I9P102

How to Cite?

Prashanth Kumar Sanjeevaiah, Ramesh Kumar Donga, Ashish Karn, "Performance Analysis and Optimization of Undershot Water Wheel for Small-Scale Hydropower Applications," SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 12,  no. 9, pp. 15-28, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V12I9P102

Abstract:

This study examines the performance of four undershot water wheels with different blade counts and profiles to identify the optimal setup for small-scale hydropower. The original wheel (nO24), with 24 flat blades and installed at the Kalinga canal in Dehradun, India, is compared to new (N) designs with 24 (nN24), 36 (nN36), and 48 (nN48) curved blades. All models have a 1-meter diameter, scaled down at a 4:1 ratio and tested in the turbine facility at the UPES Fluid Mechanics Lab, Dehradun. Design Expert 13 (DoE) software was used to optimize the number of experiments. Tests were conducted under varying flow rates, heads, and loads to evaluate hydraulic efficiency (η) and mechanical power (P). The nO24 wheel failed at higher loads (1.85 L/s), while the nN24 reached a maximum efficiency of 58%, improving by 6% over nO24. The nN36 outperformed all, achieving 65% efficiency and 1.35 W power output. In comparison, nN48 had reduced productivity from flow interference. Overall, nN36 had the highest efficiency-power trade-off with an increased power output of 27%. This study has shown that curved blade designs, in general, could be beneficial for undershot wheels used in decentralized, small-scale hydropower systems.

Keywords:

Micro water turbine, Water wheel, Turbine blades, Power, Efficiency, Response surface method.

References:

[1] Alexandru Moldoveanu, and Daniela Popescu, “Assessment of Small Hydropower Potential by Software. Case Study,” Matec Web Conference: 21st Innovative Manufacturing Engineering & Energy International Conference, vol. 112, pp. 1-6, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Yury Dementyev et al., “Gearless Micro Hydropower Plant for Small Water-Course,” Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 155-166, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Nor Fadilah Yah, Mat Sahat Idris, and Ahmed Nurye Oumer, “Numerical Investigation on Effect of Immersed Blade Depth on the Performance of Undershot Water Turbines,” Matec Web Conference: The 3rd International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Research, vol. 74, pp. 1-5, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Emanuele Quaranta, Innovative Projects and Technology Implementation in the Hydropower Sector, Technological Innovations and Advances in Hydropower Engineering, IntechOpen, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Mehmet Bilgili, and Arif Ozbek, “An Overview of Micro-Hydropower Technologies and Design Characteristics of Waterwheel Systems,” Çukurova University Faculty of Engineering Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 117-134, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Yasmina Martínez et al., “Impact of Small-Scale Hydropower Stations on Macroinvertebrate Communities for Regulated Rivers,” Limnetica, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 317-334, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar][Publisher Link]
[7] Emanuele Quaranta, and Gerald Müller, “Sagebien and Zuppinger Water Wheels for Very Low Head Hydropower Applications,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 526-536, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Muhammad Asim et al., “Design and Parametric Optimization of the High-Speed Pico Waterwheel for Rural Electrification of Pakistan,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1-22, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Suhartono Suhartono et al., “The Performances of Undershot Waterwheel with Butterfly-Shaped Blades and the Radius of Grasshopper's Elbow: The Utilization Efforts for River Electrical Energy Potential,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Yasuyuki Nishi et al., “Study on an Undershot Cross-Flow Water Turbine With Straight Blades,” International Journal of Rotating Machinery, vol. 2015, pp. 1-10, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Piyawat Sritram, and Ratchaphon Suntivarakorn, “Comparative Study of Small Hydropower Turbine Efficiency at Low Head Water,” Energy Procedia, vol. 138, pp. 646-650, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] E.Y. Setyawan et al., “Design of Low Flow Undershot Type Water Turbine,” Journal of Science Applied Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 50-55, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Manh Hung Nguyen, Haechang Jeong, and Changjo Yang, “A Study on Flow Fields and Performance of Water Wheel Turbine Using Experimental and Numerical Analyses,” Science China Technological Sciences, vol. 61, pp. 464-474, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Emanuele Quaranta, and Roberto Revelli, “Hydraulic Behavior and Performance of Breastshot Water Wheels for Different Numbers of Blades,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Luther Sule, Andi Amijoyo Mochtar, and Onny Sutresman, “Performance of Undershot Water Wheel with Bowl-shaped Blades Model, Performan,” International Journal of Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 278-287, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Avita Ayu Permanasari et al., “Experimental Investigation and Optimization of Floating Blade Water Wheel Turbine Performance Using Taguchi Method and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA),” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering: International Conference on Condensed Matters and Advanced Materials, Malang, Indonesia, vol. 515, pp. 1-11, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Wenjin Feng et al., “Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Clearance Effects between Blades and Hub in a Water Wheel Used for Power Generation,” Water, vol. 14, no. 22, pp. 1-20, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Emanuele Quaranta, and Roberto Revelli, “CFD Simulations to Optimize the Blade Design of Water Wheels,” Drinking Water Engineering and Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27-32, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Mengshang Zhao et al., “Performance Investigation of the Immersed Depth Effects on a Water Wheel Using Experimental and Numerical Analyses,” Water, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1-17, 2020,
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Shakun Paudel et al., “Experimental and Numerical Study of Zuppinger Water Wheel Model,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 206-216, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
 [21] Emanuele Quaranta, and Gerald Müller, “Noise Generation and Acoustic Impact of Free Surface Hydropower Machines: Focus on Water Wheels and Emerging Challenges,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 1-7, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Dan Mugisidi et al., “Development of the Dethridge Wheel Blade Shape for Hydropower Generation in Irrigation Canals in Indonesia,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 146-156, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Yasuyuki Nishi et al., “Study on Performance Improvement of an Axial Flow Hydraulic Turbine with a Collection Device,” International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 47-55, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Irwan Lie Keng Wong et al., “Performance of Undershot Waterwheel Curved Blade of the Laboratory Scale,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 967, pp. 250-255, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] E. Quaranta, and R. Revelli, “Optimization of Breastshot Water Wheels Performance Using Different Inflow Configurations,” Renewable Energy, vol. 97, pp. 243-251, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] N.F. Yah et al., “Numerical Investigation on Effect of Blade Shape for Stream Water Wheel Performance,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering: International Conference on Innovative Technology, Engineering and Sciences, Pekan Campus Library, Malaysia, vol. 342, pp. 1-11, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Piyawat Sritram, and Ratchaphon Suntivarakorn, “The Efficiency Comparison of Hydro Turbines for Micro Power Plant from Free Vortex,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 23, pp. 1-13, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Rahmat Boli et al., “Analisis Daya Output Dan Efisiensi Kincir Air Sudu Miring Yang Bekerja Pada Saluran Horizontal,” Gorontalo Journal of Infrastructure & Science Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1-36, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Abhishekkumar Shingala et al., “Genetic Optimisation of a Free-Stream Water Wheel Using 2D Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations Points towards Design with Fully Immersed Blades,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1-20, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Raj Kumar Chaulagain, Akash Kalwar, and Purushottam Khatiwada, “Simulation and Experimental Analysis of Fixed and Rotating Blades on the Runner of Oryon Watermill Applicable for Head Drops of the Canal,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1-8, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Zelalem Girma, “Techno-Economic Feasibility of Small Scale Hydropower in Ethiopia: The Case of the Kulfo River, in Southern Ethiopia,” Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 2016, pp. 1-12, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Asral Asral, Musthafa Akbar, and Syafri Syafri, “The Performance of Undershot Water Turbine Combined With Spiral Tube Pump On Empowerment of Energy Resources Local Contiguous Small River,” Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -Science and Engineering, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 19-23, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Dewi Puspita Sari et al., “Blade Configuration and Depth Ratio Impact on Undershot Waterwheel in Compact Irrigation for Sustainable Off-Grid Electrification,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 47, 2025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Miguel M. Uamusse et al., “Mini-Grid Hydropower for Rural Electrification in Mozambique: Meeting Local Needs with Supply in a Nexus Approach,” Water, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1-19, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Ahmad Firdaus Abdul Jalil, Jagadeesh Pasupuleti, and M. Reyasudin Basir Khan, “Feasibility Evaluation of Micro-Hydropower System Generation for Different Types of Sewage Treatment Plants,” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 6338-6341, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Jose Bernardes et al., “Hydropower Operation Optimization Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review,” AI, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 78-99, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Christine Ann Teodoro, “Harnessing Hydroelectric Energy from Water Irrigation Pumps: A Sustainable Lighting Solution for Agricultural Fields and Fishponds,” E3S Web of Conferences: 1st International Conference on Advanced Materials & Sustainable Energy Technologies, vol. 488, pp. 1-24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Nerantzis Kazakis et al., “Groundwater Depletion. Are Environmentally Friendly Energy Recharge Dams a Solution?,” Water, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1-20, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] G. Müller, and C. Wolter, “The Breastshot Waterwheel: Design and Model Tests,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 203-211, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Bruna A. Da Silva, Renata E. De Oliveira, and Tomas F. Domingues, “Multifunctionality, Social Benefits, and Engagement: Insights for Forest Restoration Success from a Study Case in Brazil,” Restoration Ecology, vol. 33, no. 1, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Nicola Favretto et al., “Knowledge Exchange Enhances Engagement in Ecological Restoration and Rehabilitation Initiatives,” Restoration Ecology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1-8, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Emanuele Quaranta, Jean Pierre Perrier, and Roberto Revelli, “Optimal Design Process of Crossflow Banki Turbines: Literature Review and Novel Expeditious Equations,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 257, pp. 1-15, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Dilshod Kodirov, and Obid Tursunov, “Calculation of Water Wheel Design Parameters for Micro Hydroelectric Power Station,” Conferences: XXII International Scientific Conference “Construction the Formation of Living Environment,” vol. 97, pp. 1-11, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Susan E. Kelly, and Lawrence C. Murdoch, “Measuring the Hydraulic Conductivity of Shallow Submerged Sediments,” Ground Water, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 431-439, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] A.J. Archer, and R. Evans, “Dynamical Density Functional Theory and Its Application to Spinodal Decomposition,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 4246-4254, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Tineke Saroinsong et al., “Performance of Three-Bladed Archimedes Screw Turbine,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 9491-9495, 2016.
[Publisher Link]