Design and Analysis of Foundation over Weak Sub grade Layer with Geo Synthetics

International Journal of Civil Engineering
© 2019 by SSRG - IJCE Journal
Volume 6 Issue 12
Year of Publication : 2019
Authors : Amit Kumar Singh
How to Cite?

Amit Kumar Singh, "Design and Analysis of Foundation over Weak Sub grade Layer with Geo Synthetics," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 6,  no. 12, pp. 12-18, 2019. Crossref,


The pull-out resistance of reinforcing parts is one among the most vital factors in increasing bearing capability. During this analysis a new reinforcing element that features attaching components to normal soil for increasing the resistance strength of reinforcements is introduced. The objective of the present work is to analyze performance of geogrid reinforcement placed below the footing on non-homogeneous soil and to investigate the behavior of geogrid- reinforced beds by analytical study. The work presented in the thesis will lead to a better understanding of the mechanism of foundation on geogrid reinforced soil beds. Based on results obtained from the current investigation it is said to be that the saving is created in subsoil depth for constant collapse settlement performance by victimization geogrid reinforced foundation system. A load settlement response was measured when geogrid reinforcement was provided. The stiffer response was determined at a comparatively a lot of reduction in settlement concerning 28.77% and 27% for foundation model to u equals to 0 and 150mm respectively. A load and stress response was measured when a geogrid reinforcement was provided and a response was determined that, comparatively a lot of reduction in stresses concerning 50.24% and 49.15% for foundation model comparable to u equals to 0 and 150mm respectively. It is determined that comparatively a lot of reduction in total elastic strain concerning 47.71% and 19.37% comparable to u equals to 0 and 150mm respectively. The results were obtained from the analysis indicates that a depth of placement of geogrid reinforcing layer is below the footing that is u=0mm and u=150mm for layered foundation conditions.


Footing, Reinforcement, Geogrid Fiber, Loading Condition, Shallow Foundation, etc.


[1] Raymond, G.P., and Komos F.E., Repeated load testing on a model plane strain footing, Canadian Geotechnical Journal., 15(2), (1978), 190-201.
[2] Shin EC., Das BM., Puri VK., Yen SC., Cook EE., “Bearing capacity of strip foundation on geogrid reinforced clay,Geotech Test J 16(4), (1993),534–541.
[3] Omar et al.,Ultimate bearing capacity of rectangular foundations on geogrid reinforced sand,Geotech (1993).
[4] Yetimoglu et al,The bearing capacity of rectangular footings on reinforced sand,PhD, Thesis (1994).
[5] B.M Das and Shin E (1994),Strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced clay behaviour under cyclic loading, Geotextiles and Geomembranes., 13(10), (1994), 657–667.
[6] M.R. DeMerchant, A.J. Valsangkar, A.B. Schriver,Plate load tests on geogrid- reinforced expanded shale lightweight aggregate, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 20,(2002),173–
[7] DeMerchant, M.R., Valsangkar, A.J., and Schriver, A.B., (2002). ,Plate load tests on geogrid-reinforced expanded shale lightweight aggregate,.Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 20,(2002), 173 -190.
[8] Gerald Raymond,Issa Ismail,The effect of geogrid reinforcement on unbound Aggregates, Geotextiles and Geomembranes21,(2003),355– locate/geotexmem.
[9] B.B. Budkowsk*, J. Yu ,Mitigation of short term rutting by interlocking layer developed around a geogrid-sensitivity analysis.,Computers and Geotechnics 30,(2003),61–
[10] JoanjunLeng., and Mohammed A Gabr., (2003),Numerical analysis of stress deformation response in reinforced unpaved road sections,. Transpiration Research Board, 1-26.
[11] B.V.S. Viswanadham, D. K.onig,Studies on scaling and instrumentation of a geogrid, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 22,(2004),307– locate/geotexmem.
[12] C.R. Patra, B.M. Das, C. Atalar ,Bearing capacity of embedded strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23,(2005),454–462,
[13] C.R. Patra, B.M. Das,_, M. Bhoi, E.C. Shin,Eccentrically loaded strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand,Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24,(2006),254–259,
[14] S.F. Brown,_, J. Kwan, N.H. Thom,Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast” Geotextiles and Geomembranes 25,(2007),326–
[15] Robert W. Sarsby“Use of „Limited Life Geotextiles‟ (LLGs) for basal reinforcement of embankments built on soft clay”Geotextiles and Geomembranes 25,(2007),302–
[16] Al-Qadi I., Dessouky S., Kwon J., and Tutumluer E., ,Geogrid in flexible pavements: Validated mechanism.,Transportation Research Record 2045, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC., (2008), 102–109.
[17] MoghaddasTafreshi, S.N., and Khalaj, O.,Laboratory tests of small- diameter HDPE pipes buried in reinforced sand under repeated load.,Geotextiles and Geomembranes,26, (8), (2008),145-163.
[18] Palmeira Marques Ennio.,Soil–geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27,(2009), 68-390.
[19] NazzalMunir, D., Abu-FarsakhMurad, Y., and Mohammad Louay, N.,Implementation of a Critical State Two-Surface Model to evaluate the response of Geosynthetic reinforced pavement, International Journal of Geomechanics, 10,(2010),202-212.
[20] Das, S.K., Biswal, R.K., Sivakugan, N., and Das, B., Classification of slopes and prediction of factor of safety using differential evolution neural networks,.Environ Earth Science., 64, (2011),201–210.
[21] Rajagopal, K., Veeragavan A., and Chandramouli S.,.Studies on geocell reinforced road pavement structures.5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics, (2012), 497-502.
[22] Liu Chia-Nan., Yang Kuo-Hsin., and Nguyen Duc Minh., ,Behavior of geogrid reinforced sand and effect of reinforcement anchorage in large scale plane strain compression., Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 42,(2014), 479 - 493.
[23] Sumit Bhardwaj, Qazi Naveed Mehraj, A Review on Foundation of Buildings& Structures, SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering 2(3) (2015) 1-6.