Integrated Assessment of Cost and Embodied Carbon in Parking Lot Pavement Design
| International Journal of Civil Engineering |
| © 2025 by SSRG - IJCE Journal |
| Volume 12 Issue 10 |
| Year of Publication : 2025 |
| Authors : Riza Suwondo, Made Suangga, Militia Keintjem, Mohammed Altaee |
10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I10P104
How to Cite?
Riza Suwondo, Made Suangga, Militia Keintjem, Mohammed Altaee, "Integrated Assessment of Cost and Embodied Carbon in Parking Lot Pavement Design," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 52-60, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I10P104
Abstract:
The construction sector significantly contributes to global greenhouse gas emissions, with rigid pavement systems forming a substantial portion of urban infrastructure. Although structural performance has traditionally guided pavement design, there is a growing need to incorporate environmental and economic considerations, particularly embodied carbon and construction costs, into early-stage design decisions. This study aims to identify the optimum rigid pavement configuration for parking lots by evaluating the influence of concrete compressive strength and lean concrete subbase thickness on the structural thickness, embodied carbon, and cost. Twelve pavement configurations were analysed, varying in concrete grade (20–40 MPa). Subbase conditions (0, 50, and 100 mm of lean concrete), under a uniform subgrade condition (CBR 6%) and 40-year design life based on ACI 330 Traffic Spectrum C. Pavement thickness was determined using PavementDesigner.org, and a cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted in accordance with BS EN 15978 to quantify embodied carbon. Construction cost estimation followed a unit-price approach using standardised data from the Indonesian Ministry of Public Works (PUPR). The results revealed that designs using 25–30 MPa concrete without a subbase offered the best performance trade-off, achieving the lowest embodied carbon (48.2–48.3 kgCO2e/m2) and construction cost (US$9.2–9.3/m2), while still satisfying design reliability. In contrast, high-strength concrete (40 MPa) with a 100 mm subbase increased emissions and cost by up to 50% and 52%, respectively, with a marginal structural benefit. These findings highlight the need to avoid excessive overdesign. They show moderate-strength concrete with a minimal subbase, which offers a structurally sound, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly solution for urban parking lot pavements.
Keywords:
Rigid Pavement, Embodied Carbon, Parking Lot Design, Life Cycle Assessment, Sustainable Construction.
References:
[1] Muhammad Shafique, and Xiaowei Lu, “Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Battery Electric Vehicles from the Current and Future Energy Mix Perspective,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 303, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Larry E. Erickson, and Gary Brase, Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Improving Air Quality: Two Interrelated Global Challenges, 1st ed., CRC Press, pp. 1 178, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Nonna Martinov‐Bennie, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting and Assurance: Reflections on the Current State,” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 244 251, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Michał P. Drewniok et al., “Mapping Material Use and Embodied Carbon in UK Construction,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 197, pp. 1 10, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] UNEP, “2023 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction,” Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, Report, pp. 1 18, 2023.
[Publisher Link]
[6] Nwe Ni Myint, and Muhammad Shafique, “Embodied Carbon Emissions of Buildings: Taking a Step towards Net Zero Buildings,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 20, pp. 1 20, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Elena Pérez Bernabeu et al., “Horizontal Cooperation in Road Transportation: A Case Illustrating Savings in Distances and Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 585 606, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Valentina Radić et al., “Regional and Global Projections of Twenty First Century Glacier Mass Changes in Response to Climate Scenarios from Global Climate Models,” Climate Dynamics, vol. 42, pp. 37 58, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Bin Ouyang et al., “Methodology of Urban Transport Carbon Emission Calculation Applicable for China: Guangzhou as a Case Study,” Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, pp. 447 456, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Giulia Del Serrone, Paolo Peluso, and Laura Moretti, “Photovoltaic Road Pavements as a Strategy for Low Carbon Urban Infrastructures,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1 15, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Kuldip Kumar et al., “In Situ Infiltration Performance of Different Permeable Pavements in a Employee Used Parking Lot A Four
Year Study,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 167, pp. 8 14, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Tiziano Dalla Mora et al., “Mitigation Urban Heat Island by Using Porous and Permeable Block Pavement,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 346, pp. 1 31, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Xiaodan Chen, and Hao Wang, “Life Cycle Assessment and Multi Criteria Performance Evaluation of Pervious Concrete Pavement with Fly Ash,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 177, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Jaime Styer et al., “Innovations in Pavement Design and Engineering: A 2023 Sustainability Review,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 1 24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Qingcheng Meng et al., “Assessing the Environmental Impact of Building Life Cycle: A Carbon Reduction Strategy through Innovative Design, Intelligent Construction, and Secondary Utilization,” Developments in the Built Environment, vol. 16, pp. 1 14, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Ellen Marsh, John Orr, and Tim Ibell, “Quantification of Uncertainty in Product Stage Embodied Carbon Calculations for Buildings,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 251, pp. 1 28, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Lizhen Huang et al., “Carbon Emission of Global Construction Sector,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 81, pp. 1906
1916, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Sajan KC, and Dipendra Gautam, “Progress in Sustainable Structural Engineering: A Review,” Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, vol. 6, pp. 1 85, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Zhi Cao et al., “Decarbonizing Concrete: Deep Decarbonization Pathways for the Cement and Concrete Cycle in the United States, India, and China,” Industrial Sustainability Analysis lab Climate works foundation, Technical Report, 2021.
[Google Scholar]
[20] Johanna Lehne, and Felix Preston, “Making Concrete Change Innovation in Low carbon Cement and Concrete,” Chatham House Report, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, pp. 1 138, 2018.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Nicholas Santero, Alexander Loijos, and John Ochsendorf, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Opportunities for Concrete Pavements, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 859 868, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Milena Rangelov et al., “Readily Implementable Strategies for Reducing Embodied Environmental Impacts of Concrete Pavements in the United States,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2676, no. 9, pp. 436 450, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Sharon T. Abey, and Sreevalsa Kolathayar, “Embodied Energy and Carbon Emissions of Pavements: A Review,” Advances in Energy and Built Environment: Select Proceedings of TRACE 2018, pp. 167 173, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Vincent L. Bernardin, Michael Grovak, and Roberto Miquel, “Concrete versus Tailpipes: Importance of Embodied Carbon and Vehicle Emissions in Carbon Footprint of Dedicated Truck Lanes on I 70,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2270, no. 1, pp. 107 112, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Avishreshth Singh, Poornachandra Vaddy, and Krishna Prapoorna Biligiri, “Quantification of Embodied Energy and Carbon Footprint of Pervious Concrete Pavements through a Methodical Lifecycle Assessment Framework,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 161, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] American Concrete Institute, Commercial Concrete Parking Lots and Site Paving Design and Construction Guide, ACI Committee 330, pp. 1 5, 2021.
[Publisher Link]
[27] “Road Pavement Design Manual,” No. 03/M/BM/2024, Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing Directorate General of Highways, Technical Report, pp. 1 389, 2024.
[Publisher Link]
[28] BS EN 15978:2011: Sustainability of Construction Works. Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings. Calculation Method, BSI, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] LETI Embodied Carbon Primer, Supplementary guidance to the Climate Emergency Design Guide, pp. 1 144, 2024.
[Publisher Link]
[30] Michael Samson, and Roger Pope, “A Comparative Embodied Carbon Assessment of Commercial Buildings,” The Institution of Structural Engineers, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 38 49, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Vincent J.L. Gan et al., “A Comparative Analysis of Embodied Carbon in High Rise Buildings Regarding Different Design Parameters,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 161, pp. 663 675, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Circular Ecology, “The Inventory of Carbon and Energy (The ICE Database),” 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Xiaoli Ji et al., “Advancing toward a Low Carbon Infrastructure: Emission Reduction Potential of Geopolymer Road Maintenance,” Materials Today Sustainability, vol. 30, pp. 1 10, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] K.K.D.A. Wijesekara et al., “Mechanical and Durability Analysis of Geopolymer Concrete made with Recycled Silicate Activator for Low Carbon Breakwaters,” Cleaner Waste Systems, vol. 11, pp. 1 17, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Aly Muhammed Aly Ahmed, and Islam M. Mantawy, “Additive Construction of Low Embodied Carbon Concrete: Geopolymer Concrete,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 111, pp. 1 16, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Huanyu Li et al., “From Waste to Worth: Biochar and Hemp Fiber Synergy for Carbon Sequestering and Durable Recycled ggregate Concrete,” Resources, Environment and Sustainability, vol. 22, pp. 1 13, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Mingyang Ma, Meng Chen, and Tong Zhang, “Research on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Low Carbon Ultra High Performance Concrete using Carbonated Recycled Fine Aggregate,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 491, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Eduardo Rigo et al., “Concrete with Recycled Aggregates from Construction: Properties, Emissions and Carbon Capture Assessment,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 23, pp. 1 21, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]